When this arrived I glanced at "Cetra" and 
          at "Mario Rossi" and supposed this was the time-honoured 1956 
          performance which for many years remained the only one. The last twenty 
          years have seen a complete reassessment of Rossini’s final opera and 
          the several versions that have appeared, most notably under Gardelli, 
          Chailly and Muti, have adopted differing solutions to the question of 
          the text and the language but have in their various ways dispelled the 
          notion that the opera needs to be presented with the drastic cuts made 
          by Rossi (who was following a time-honoured tradition). That said, the 
          1956 set, tolerably recorded, remains valuable for the presence of Dietrich 
          Fischer-Dieskau as Guglielmo. 
        
But, as you can see, this is another version under 
          Rossi and I was unaware of it. The first thing to be said is that this 
          is the untamed Cetra sound that made many collectors blench even back 
          in the 1950s and treat Cetra sets only as stopgaps for operas otherwise 
          unavailable. The voices are very close, very strong and with a cutting 
          edge. Way behind them is a very boxily recorded orchestra, again with 
          a strident treble and next to no bass. There is a fair amount of "wow" 
          in the orchestra but the voices are firm. I take it (without having 
          an original for comparison) that this has been transferred to CD "neat", 
          with no attempt to attenuate it. To be fair, I listened to the last 
          part on headphones and to my surprise, instead of boring a hole from 
          one side of my head to the other, the effect seemed a little more rounded. 
          Hitherto I had found it all too wearing to provide much enjoyment, but 
          my wife thoroughly enjoyed it downstairs so a possible expedient, if 
          you can’t tame it in your listening-room, would seem to be to shut the 
          doors and hear it in another room. 
        
For the student of past performers, however, there 
          is quite a lot to be appreciated. First, Rossi’s conducting. He was 
          then 49 and in 1945 had been recommended by Toscanini for the post of 
          "Artistic Secretary" of La Scala. However, he preferred to 
          accept the RAI’s offer of the position of Artistic Director of their 
          Turin Symphony Orchestra, remaining there till 1969 and occupying in 
          post-war Italy a role comparable to that of Boult at the BBC in 1930s 
          and 1940s Britain. The portamento-laden cellos at the beginning of the 
          Prelude hark back to a pre-war style of orchestral playing in which 
          morbidezza was the keyword. By the same token he obtains an extraordinarily 
          poetic rendering of the shepherd’s song, free in expression but swift 
          in tempo. At the same time Rossi was working hard to bring the orchestra 
          up to an international standard and, if wholly accident-free horns are 
          too much to expect, there is sizzling vitality and striking accuracy 
          in the faster string-writing and a whiplash attack which makes moments 
          such as the ensemble which comes after "Resta immobile" thrilling 
          indeed. In the later recording he had the RAI’s somewhat lower-level 
          Milan orchestra and partly because of this and partly because it was 
          not "his" orchestra, he obtained a more generalised vitality. 
        
Fischer-Dieskau’s Guglielmo remains a remarkable document, 
          his lieder-like care over the words in no way precluding a long Italianate 
          legato. Taddei offers a more "normal" assumption and a finely 
          authoritative one. He was by then 45 and on the way to becoming one 
          of the leading Italian baritones of his generation. His Met debut took 
          place that same year. 
        
Carteri was about as close to a child prodigy as it 
          is possible to get in a profession which depends on physical maturity. 
          She began to study singing at the age of ten, made her debut in Lohengrin 
          when she was 19 (but I can’t tell you what her role was) and was 21 
          when she made this recording. The following year she appeared as Desdemona 
          at Salzburg and later Poulenc’s Gloria was written for her. Perhaps 
          all this happened too early, for my previous encounters with her were 
          somewhat later recordings, a passable Traviata made for television and 
          various re-broadcasts of RAI archive material which suggests that by 
          the 1960s she was inclined to sing flat, and in fact she faded out of 
          the scene after that time. Her Matilde is completely secure, her voice 
          ringing with youthful splendour. Carteri was one of the generation of 
          sopranos that lost out by that overwhelming presence of Callas that 
          only Tebaldi seemed able to resist, singers whom the world would have 
          welcomed with open arms at any other time. Another such was Anita Cerquetti 
          who took the part in 1956. Both are strong assets to their respective 
          recordings. 
        
Unfortunately the 1956 set, once one has exhausted 
          one’s praise of Fischer-Dieskau, Cerquetti and Rossi himself, has a 
          cast made up of largely forgotten singers; mostly adequate, they do 
          nothing to suggest we should remember them any more than we do. The 
          present version has a fair list of distinguished names to follow. Filippeschi 
          may not have quite reached the "great" status, but he negotiates 
          a notoriously difficult role with technical ease and a good deal of 
          musicality. To have Tozzi and Corena in small parts (both were well-established 
          by then) is luxury casting, while Plinio Clabassi and Miti Truccato 
          Pace, stalwarts of many a RAI production, are thoroughly reliable. And 
          then we have the young Graziella Sciutti in a heavier role than those 
          she subsequently undertook. All-in-all, while the recording is too "historical" 
          in quality to make this a first, second or third choice, opera buffs 
          will find a number of fine and interesting performances here. 
        
 
        
        
Christopher Howell