For a pianist so associated with the French repertoire 
          it’s somewhat perplexing to find that these Ravel recordings have been 
          out of the domestic catalogue for so long. His Debussy set, currently 
          on EMI CHS 5 658552, has always occupied a central place in the discography 
          – as Bryce Morrison says in his notes Gieseking is to Debussy as Schnabel 
          is to Beethoven or Rubinstein to Chopin - whereas his sovereignty in 
          Ravel seems to have been very slightly eroded over the years. Which 
          again, if true, is a matter for bewilderment. Whilst other pianists 
          may sometimes bring greater clarity of articulation to Ravel or a greater 
          elegance very few can command the myriad exquisite nuances that constantly 
          illuminate the music in the way Gieseking invariably does.
        
 In the Menuet antique, one of Ravel’s first published 
          piano works, we are introduced to his unique brand of piquant antiquarianism, 
          a trait he was never to lose, visiting the past and vesting it in new 
          garb. And in the Pavane pour une infante defunte we can hear Gieseking’s 
          extraordinary pedalling subtleties and characteristic pearl drop tone; 
          at 3.25 he creates a heavily pedalled wash that magically ushers in 
          the right hand line. The gradations of tone throughout the range are 
          fabulously exact and never calculated. Jeux d’eau is rapidly played. 
          The River God is certainly laughing at the water here – and Gieseking’s 
          fleetness is sometimes to the detriment of clarity of articulation even 
          though it is unavoidably true to say that his occasional technical shortcomings 
          are seemingly subsumed into the greater whole.
        
 It is in fact remarkable that his two years with Karl 
          Leimer were the extent of his official studies; his famous comment that 
          "talent goes in inverse ratio to the necessity for practice" 
          might otherwise be seen as an ignoble boast were it not for his laconic 
          truthfulness and the fact that his sensibility was never obviously virtuosic 
          but one of the heightened poetic. In the archaisms of the Sonatine (1903/5) 
          Gieseking’s second movement is stately – with bass notes staccato and 
          ineffably wry – and at 2.59 he opens out his pedalling, terracing the 
          final chords’ dynamics, animated by his remarkable ear for apposite 
          sonorities. The nonchalant flourish at the end of the Anime movement 
          is another feature of his craft and perfectly judged. Miroirs is not 
          immaculately played but it is so evocative and supremely imaginative 
          that the imperfections are of little significance. 
        
If there is some over-pedalling in Une barque sur l’ocean 
          (and the tempo is really too fast for the succeeding thematic relationship 
          to work) and if the two glissandos in La vallee des cloches are excitingly 
          but not always audibly played, what is that against so much that is 
          supreme? In Noctuelles those passages frequently fudged by other pianists 
          are triumphantly clear. In Oiseaux tristes the middle voices are brought 
          out in perfect gradation – tonally this is playing of the greatest imagination 
          and technical resource. Gieseking’s rhythm in Une barque propels the 
          chopping rhythm onward with torrents of ascending and descending runs 
          under great control. Right hand flourishes are coolly tossed off in 
          Alborada del gracioso and even more magnificent are his repeated notes 
          here – quiet, fast, even and tremendously difficult to accomplish. The 
          tonal weight at 4.02 in La Vallee des cloches is exquisite – this is 
          truly a transfiguration. 
        
In Gaspard de la nuit Gieseking plays up the contrasts 
          of volume and tempo – listen for example at 5.30 – and within a seemingly 
          constricted compass he conjures up magical colouristic inflections. 
          The fast passagework (maybe too fast for optimum comfort) with lots 
          of pedal is a galvanizing and macabre triumph. The little Haydn piece 
          dates from 1909, the centenary of his death. Ravel’s admixture of tribute 
          and harmonic piquancy is winningly done. The Schubertian tribute – the 
          Valses nobles et sentimentales – caused bafflement on first hearing 
          but Gieseking has their full measure. He brings insouciant whimsy to 
          the Assez anime movement (No 4) and is never too fast for coherent articulation 
          in the rapid movement Vif (No 6). His rhythm is always alive and animated, 
          his tone wonderfully complex. The lightly parodic "In the style 
          of…" are witty little pastiches of Borodin and Chabrier – and, 
          at under two minutes each, succinct. 
        
Le Tombeau de Couperin, one of the cornerstones of 
          the French pianistic repertoire, is made for Gieseking. His rapid wit 
          is accentuated in the Prelude with the use of unusually light pedalling. 
          The Fugue is eventfully played – softened tone, even production, though 
          perhaps with not quite the level of dynamic variety one would wish for. 
          In Forlane, a five-minute Allegretto, his clarity never descends into 
          artificiality or disengagement – on the contrary, this is pianism of 
          immense contrast and life. It is not the only way to play Ravel – what 
          could be – and contrasts with the perhaps more centrally French playing 
          of, say, Robert Casadesus or Marcelle Meyer, both of whose impulses 
          were rather more aloof than Gieseking’s. But there can be no greater 
          compliment than to say of a performance that during its span one is 
          convinced that the music could go no other way. And that is Gieseking’s 
          Ravel. 
        
 
          Jonathan Woolf