When all but the very youngest music-lovers can still 
          have memories of Richter in the concert hall, when recordings, authorised 
          and unauthorised, early, middle and late are cropping up from every 
          imaginable source, does Richter need to be "rediscovered"? 
          Only recently I had a 1966 Aldeburgh Festival recital to review from 
          BBC Legends (BBCL 4082-2) and concluded 
          that, even when the pianist was in a slightly didactic mood, he should 
          be bought all the same. Well, precisely because of all this plethora 
          of material, much of it in inferior sound, not all of it presenting 
          the artist in his best light, especially the performances from the last 
          years where his Teutonic ancestry was inclined to predominate, we need 
          to rejoice and rush to the nearest shop when an issue like this comes 
          along that really lets us "rediscover", in case we had been 
          in danger of forgetting, that Richter was absolutely and unquestionably 
          a very great pianist indeed. 
        
The bulk of the release consists of a recital that 
          Richter gave towards the end of his wildly-acclaimed debut tour of the 
          United States. After the five programmed concerts at the Carnegie Hall 
          in October 1960, followed by visits to other American cities and some 
          recording sessions (Beethoven 1 with Münch plus some Sonatas, Brahms 
          2 with Leinsdorf), a further Carnegie Hall recital was added by popular 
          request, on 26th December. Two days later the same programme 
          was repeated in the Mosque Theatre, Newark, but the encores, apart from 
          one of the Prokofiev "Visions", were all different. So here 
          we have the complete Carnegie Hall recital, including the encores, plus 
          the encores from the Mosque Theatre. Both recitals were recorded in 
          stereo and approved for release by Richter himself, yet extraordinarily 
          only 5 of the "Visions fugitives" and the Cinderella Gavotte 
          actually appeared on LP (some items from the Mosque Theatre recital 
          proper also came out on LP), and everything here is released on CD for 
          the first time. 
        
The recordings are extremely good, a little two-dimensional 
          but clear and responsive to Richter’s tonal gradations and with only 
          the smallest touch of distortion on a few fortes in the upper register. 
          They are considerably better than the BBC Legends disc and fully comparable 
          to any good studio-made recording of the time. Plentiful applause has 
          been included, some of which can be edited out, but not that which punctuates 
          the "Visions fugitives" (he evidently played them in groups 
          of two or three). I hope that some future issue might edit this out 
          as it does make for rather irritating home-listening. 
        
Very often, romantically-inclined pianists do better 
          in Haydn than in Mozart. Richter was always inclined to be rather severely 
          logical in the latter composer (as in the Aldeburgh recital); this Haydn 
          Sonata is a sizzling revelation of the composers true stature in this 
          field. It’s true that you won’t get from Richter that early-morning 
          bonhomie in the first movement that we normally associate with 
          Haydn, but we do get a steely strength and a real passion, much depth 
          of feeling in the very slow slow movement and a certain grandeur as 
          well as energy which makes the last movement a real finale to what has 
          gone before. How much use did Richter make of the sustaining pedal? 
          Maybe none at all, my ears tell me (even where Haydn asks for it, but 
          this is a vexed question since Haydn’s indicated pedal markings cannot 
          really be done on a modern piano). Every little note sings unclouded 
          by resonance from its neighbour, it is a wonderful lesson in creating 
          a full, rich texture with the fingers. 
        
While the first three of Chopin’s Scherzos can just 
          about "come off" in the hands of any débutant, 
          the enigmatic no. 4 has to be left to the men. In Richter’s hands the 
          outer sections shoot up like fireworks in the sky, accompanied by a 
          dazzling display of fingerwork, and then, what singing warmth in the 
          central melody. The Ballade builds up inexorably to a climax of overwhelming 
          tension. These go straight into the library of great Chopin performances. 
        
With Rachmaninov the identification between pianist 
          and composer is complete. No generalised romanticism but an acute analysis 
          of the interplay of contrapuntal lines, with every "accompanying" 
          figure precisely weighted in relation to the texture and to its psychological 
          value. Even the composer himself could scarcely have revealed his own 
          tormented nerve-ends more powerfully. 
        
Equal composer-performer identification is to be found 
          in the Prokofiev. While possessed of steely strength, the Sonata performance 
          also gives the composer’s more lyrical aspects their due (some magical 
          softer textures), and above all never tumbles out of control or loses 
          sight of the formal shape of the work. A classic among recorded Prokofiev 
          performances. The brief aphorisms of the "Visions fugitives" 
          all hit the nail precisely on the head and the Cinderella Gavotte even 
          suggests that Richter might have had a sense of humour under all that 
          granite. 
        
About the Ravel I am not so sure. We know that, of 
          the "Gaspard" pieces, "Scarbo" and "Le gibet" 
          reveal respectively the neurotic and the morbid side of Ravel’s personality, 
          and it is interesting, if a little disconcerting, to find the two pieces 
          here interpreted in that same light. It is as though the right approach 
          is being applied to the wrong music. In Gieseking’s hands these pieces 
          have an inner tranquillity without lacking anything in keyboard colour. 
          Richter’s "Vallée" has the desolate intensity of a 
          Shostakovich slow movement. It is all fascinating in its way, but surely 
          Gieseking’s way is that which the composer himself would have recognised. 
          It is also a little incongruous to find Ravel played, however colourfully, 
          over the public address system, as it were. Oddly, this does not happen 
          in the Debussy, a truly atmospheric and genuinely "impressionistic" 
          performance. 
        
And, give this severe, granitic man some Chopin and 
          how he makes the piano sing! Untroubled by any technical difficulty, 
          the A flat Study is resolved as the purest melody, the "Revolutionary" 
          becomes a dialogue between the hands, and the Mazurka is mindful of 
          its peasant roots. 
        
In short, if you can only stretch to one CD purchase 
          this month, make it this one. 
        
 
        
        
Christopher Howell