Antoine Forqueray was a consummate composer of music 
          for the viol, his instrument of predilection. In 1747, after his death, 
          his son Jean-Baptiste published a set of his father’s music in two scores: 
          one for the viol, the other "set as pieces for the harpsichord" 
          (including three movements composed by Forqueray fils, though 
          it is possible that the son actually composed all of the music, and 
          merely used his father’s well-known name for marketing purposes). This 
          recording presents the harpsichord version of these works, which appear 
          as a model for harpsichord transcriptions of solo music, but also as 
          works in their own right. 
        
 
        
Since the original viol pieces were written for the 
          solo bass viol, the transcriptions lean toward the heavier end of the 
          harpsichord. This gives music that does not sound idiomatic to the instrument, 
          since most harpsichord uses the left-hand as accompaniment rather than 
          melodic parts. This is not the case in all of the pieces. 
        
 
        
Christophe Rousset is a fine harpsichordist, but on 
          this recording, he sounds as if he is lacking direction. His tempi often 
          tend to be very fast, as if he were in a hurry to play this music, and 
          this to the detriment of the melodic aspects of these pieces. In addition, 
          I find the instrument used, the Hemsch harpsichord belonging to the 
          Musée de la musique in Paris’s Cité de la musique, particularly 
          unsuited for these works. Its low range sounds very muddy and busy, 
          especially with the excessive ornamentation which is common with this 
          music; in the virtuoso final movement of the fifth suite, Jupiter, the 
          music is almost hidden by the "noise" of the instrument, and 
          Rousset seems almost lost in the breakneck speed of the piece, slipping 
          away from the rhythm. 
        
 
        
This harpsichord does sound excellent, however, in 
          movements such as the Sarabande: La D’Aubonne in the fourth suite. This 
          movement sounds much more like a harpsichord piece, with its melody 
          in the high range of the instrument, and all of this harpsichord’s subtle 
          sounds are heard in this piece. 
        
 
        
Yet, the overall impression is one of overly busy music, 
          with lots of ornaments detracting from the melody. Yes, this is how 
          French harpsichord music was played in the 18th century, but I cannot 
          be moved by this performance - it is just too distracting. The recording 
          itself does not help - the harpsichord sounds flat and lacks relief. 
        
 
        
Christophe Rousset is a fine harpsichordist, and this 
          music is very interesting, but it seems that Rousset got too carried 
          away with something beyond the music - the speed, the virtuosity for 
          its own sake - to truly give a recording that moves. This is a sterile 
          recording, with little life. While technically interesting, musically 
          it is little more than a hint of what might have been. 
        
 
        
        
Kirk McElhearn