This disc begins with twenty-one seconds of separately 
          tracked applause from the expectant Kyoto audience in November 2000. 
          A simulacrum of concert-going for the record buyer or sheer immodesty? 
          I have seldom heard a disc of such numbing and predictable self-indulgence 
          as this miserable example. Hardly a single movement retains any semblance 
          of architectural integrity, there is no sense of arching momentum, and 
          everything is broken-backed and subjected to wilful and narcissistic 
          displays of temperament. The tempo fluctuations in the Allegro moderato 
          of the Chopin are so damaging to the fabric of the movement that it’s 
          a wonder that two such eminent musicians could find it in themselves 
          to inflict such grammatical solecisms on the work. Maisky, who is worse 
          even than Argerich in this respect, tries to inject some heightened 
          expressivity at 13.20 but the attempt sounds spurious and calculated 
          and his all-purpose, generic tonal resources are profoundly unattractive. 
          The Largo predictably congeals in a haze of self-regarding and spineless 
          playing. The Franck’s opening movement, especially considering its rhapsodic 
          profile, is far too slow, the playing lurches from bar to bar, there 
          is ridiculous leaning on notes and abstracted point making to no structural 
          or expressive purpose. Argerich begins the Allegro with playing that 
          redefines the phrase over-accented, and at 7.40 at a witheringly fast 
          tempo all semblance of clarity of articulation vanishes. The Allegretto 
          is furthermore badly balanced and the end of the movement approximate 
          – to put it kindly. The less said about the Debussy the better. Maisky’s 
          handling of the pizzicato passage in which he outrageously bends the 
          strings and abandons any pretence at even bar by bar playing is just 
          one the many egregious horrors inflicted on a work which thrives on 
          flexibility through structural cogency. To retain some vestige of sanity 
          I played the 1930 recording by Maurice Marechal and Robert Casadesus 
          – the fact that at under ten minutes they are more than two minutes 
          quicker than Maisky and Argerich is significant only inasmuch as the 
          tempo relationships are properly maintained, phrasing is flexible but 
          controlled and expressive pointing is at the service of the music and 
          not of themselves. To complete the misery there is a "Mischa and 
          Martha" booklet note written by the cellist’s wife. 
        
 
        
        
Jonathan Woolf 
        
        
        
Terry Barfoot has also listened to this recording
        
Deutsche Grammophon rightly make much of the pedigree 
          of these famous artists, but to place the them at the heart of the production 
          of a CD, with the composers left in the far distance, seems mistaken. 
          There is precious little documentation about the music performed here, 
          but rather a lot about the artists performing it.
        
        They have recorded the Franck and Debussy pieces before, 
          in the studio for EMI, back in 1981 (CDM7 63577-2). There is little 
          to choose between the two discs, to be fair, because both have good 
          recorded sound and the performers play as well as you would expect. 
          The phrasing and rubato are more indulgent in the recent live performances, 
          which is also what you might expect. However, this is to the extent 
          that some listeners, especially those who have preconceptions about 
          how the music should sound, might accuse Maisky, in particular, of indulgence.
        
        The Franck Sonata was conceived for the violin, of 
          course, but it is often performed on the cello and cellists would not 
          want to be without it. The arrangement works well enough, since the 
          key remains A major, but it would have been helpful to have some indications 
          in the documentation of the implications of using the cello instead 
          of the violin. Instead the notes read like the kind of puffy, publicity-driven 
          interview with the artists, which too often fill the pages of the monthly 
          magazines. Here today, gone tomorrow, that sort of thing; so why include 
          so much of it with a CD which aims for a longer shelf-life?
        
        Since Franck's Sonata is a rhapsodic composition, Maisky's 
          tendency towards indulgences of tempi is appropriate enough, at face 
          value at any rate. But it must be said that there are sometimes extremes 
          involved, even though Argerich goes sensitively with him. The same might 
          be said of the Chopin Sonata, a sophisticated piece written towards 
          the end of the composer's life, whose characteristics are deeply felt 
          here. Once again Maisky's tendency to over-indulge does rob the music 
          of some of its inner tension.
        
        The Debussy performance gives much pleasure, and there 
          is a freshness about the recording which captures the special intensity 
          of the occasion. With artists such as these, there are many insights 
          into the music, but none of these performances is a first choice recommendation.
        
        Terry Barfoot