> Anton Bruckner - Symphony No. 8 [JQ]: Classical CD Reviews- Oct 2002 MusicWeb(UK)






Aureole etc.




Nimbus on-line




If it’s the Czech works you’re after, do not hesitate

  Founder: Len Mullenger
Classical Editor: Rob Barnett


Anton BRUCKNER (1824-1896)
Symphony No 8 in C minor
Second version (1888/90): Schalk/von Oberleithner edition (1892)
Bayerisches Staatsorchester conducted by Hans Knappertsbusch
Recorded 5 December 1955 in the Kongresssaal des Deutschen Museums, Munich
ORFEO C 577 021 B [70’14"]


BUY NOW 

Crotchet   AmazonUK   AmazonUS

Over the years I’ve read reviews of several recordings by Hans Knappertsbusch which have included statements to the effect that he was not at his best in the recording studio and that the results he achieved ‘live’ were much more inspirational, less inhibited. This Orfeo issue offers an opportunity to assess him in the concert hall and, frankly, the results are a major disappointment.

To be candid, this was a performance which wearied me. My listening notes are peppered with comments such as "impetuous" and "headstrong". The first movement sounded urgent at first but I soon came to feel that everything was rushed. There was no sense of the music being given time to breathe. The first great climax, for example, (track 1, 6’35") seems to be snatched at and it lacks any breadth. Even the poignant coda (11’30"), one of the most moving passages in all Bruckner, is prosaic. It should sound utterly spent and bereft but here it is just matter of fact.

The scherzo too is brusque and commonplace. The trio, marked langsam, has no real sense of relaxation. It was at this point that out of curiosity I looked at the other recordings of this work which I have in my library. Compared with the other eight versions on my shelves ‘Kna’ is by some distance the swiftest. For example, he takes a mere 12’31" for the first movement. The other interpretations range from 14’34" (Barbirolli) to 18’15" (Goodall). For the work as a whole, the closest that anyone else comes to Knappertsbusch’s overall timing of just over 70 minutes is Barbirolli at 73’45". Most other readings, whether ‘live’ or studio made, clock in at over 80 minutes. It will be noted that ‘Kna’ uses an unfamiliar edition but lest it be thought that textual cuts explain the brevity of this performance, this is not the case. The 1892 edition, the notes claim, does not vary too greatly from Leopold Nowak’s edition. The differences are "relatively marginal and primarily apply to retouches in instrumentation." Having followed this performance with a Nowak score I can confirm that this appears to be true. No, I fear that the only reason that Knappertsbusch is so much quicker than other conductors is that he rushes the symphony off its feet.

The great adagio starts off well enough but at letter A in the score (track 3, 1’01") when the brass enter the upward arpeggios are pressed forward unduly. Sad to say, the performance of the movement as a whole is no better than adequate and the sublime coda sounds perfunctory. The massive finale is no better than what has gone before. Between cues N and O in the score there is a brass-dominated tutti passage for full orchestra, underpinned by a timpani ostinato. This is one of the most grotesque passages in the whole performance. Knappertsbusch takes the dynamic down to piano and then increases both the volume and the tempo over the succeeding bars. The effect is vulgar and completely unauthorized (at least according to the Nowak score). I found little to cheer me in the remainder of the movement and the final peroration sounds portentous and vulgar with a huge, unmarked rallentando in the closing bars.

The adulatory booklet notes describe this and other contemporary Bruckner performances by the same conductor as having "spontaneity, freshness and [a] sense of rightness." Well, I’m sorry but I completely disagree. To my ears this performance sounds superficial and unauthentic. Nor does the quality of the playing help. The booklet quotes a contemporary review of the concert which avers that "all the sections of the Bavarian State Orchestra played excellently." I’m afraid I found the playing scrappy and untidy.

I’m sorry to be so negative but I found nothing in this performance to recommend it. Indeed, I feel that this issue ill serves the reputation of this conductor. Admirers of Knappertsbusch may be attracted to this release but Brucknerians should look elsewhere. Not recommended, I’m afraid.

John Quinn


Return to Index

Untitled Document


Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.