In 1963 Sir John Barbirolli gave a concert in Berlin 
          with the Philharmonic that went into legend. He conducted them in Mahler's 
          Ninth Symphony and virtually re-introduced a composer not greatly liked 
          by the orchestra. Straight away they asked if they could record the 
          piece with him and even though under contract to Deutsche Grammophon 
          were released to EMI for sessions in 1964. 
        
 
        
This is the second CD release of the recording but 
          I’m surprised it has taken EMI as long as it has to release it in their 
          "Great Recordings of the Century" series. If any EMI recording 
          by Sir John deserves inclusion this is it. In my opinion it is the best 
          Mahler recording he left us. I've always felt his view of the first 
          movement’s overall tempo and pacing to be as near definitive as you 
          can get. There is deep yearning in the opening passage and yet all is 
          carried along in an Andante comodo at the walking pace Mahler 
          surely meant and which so suits the music. Note the unfashionable portamenti 
          in the strings too. Not too much but enough for this surely to have 
          been what reminded many in the orchestra of Furtwängler. Barbirolli 
          is more passionate than many of his colleagues and yet he tempers this 
          with a striking clarity in the in the contrapuntal lines that's a living 
          example of a quotation of Bertrand Russell that Michael Kennedy found 
          in Sir John's papers. "Nothing great is achieved without passion, but 
          underneath the passion there should always be that large impersonal 
          survey which sets limits to actions that our passions inspire." Passion 
          with clear limits is what you get here and an even better illustration 
          of this would be the long Development section, remarkable for how naturally 
          expressive it sounds even at a tempo that seems quicker than many. The 
          "collapse climax" at 201-203 arrives with a fearsome inevitability too, 
          and then the "Leidenschaftlich" passage that follows it really 
          is "passionate". Notice too the superb balancing of the magnificent 
          Berlin strings, as much a tribute to the conductor as the engineers, 
          I think. Listen also to the really depressed quality to the remarkable 
          passage that follows where the muted trombones usher in a return of 
          the "Lebwohl" motive prior to the final climax which is itself 
          then driven home by the blackest of trombones, roaring out the fatal 
          arrhythmia motive. As if all this wasn't enough, listen to how Barbirolli 
          then takes the passage marked "Like a solemn funeral procession" and 
          how he holds back his tempo for each step to make its best effect. Finally, 
          in a crucial passage in the Recapitulation where flute and horn form 
          alliance, Barbirolli recalls for me some of the innocence of the First 
          Symphony. This is a touch of genius I have never heard under other conductors 
          and this could not be more appropriate as Mahler sprinkled his sketches 
          with references to "vanished days and scattered loves". Barbirolli 
          was fifty-six before he touched a Mahler symphony. An example to the 
          young blades who seem to want to record an entire cycle before they 
          are thirty. I maintain that only passionate men who have seen life can 
          conduct the Ninth like Barbirolli and that the first movement in his 
          recording is so good because it seems complete: a cross section of everything 
          the music contains. Others may scale heights and depths with more reach 
          but no one holds everything in such near-perfect balance as Sir John 
        
 
        
The second movement scherzo is as trenchant as you 
          could want. There is forward movement allied to superb playing and notice 
          the relish Barbirolli brings to the Tempo II waltz music. When the Ländler 
          material gains the ascendancy later on you also cannot miss the swagger 
          in the playing. Again I'm reminded how much the conductors of Barbirolli's 
          generation had to tell us about music which under some of today's maestri 
          can sound colourless by comparison. Only Bruno Walter "live" in 1938 
          gets to the black heart of the Rondo-Burlesque third movement but Barbirolli 
          is closer than most to the frenzy we hear there. We are light years 
          away from the passion and nostalgia of the first movement, of course. 
          Under Barbirolli the third movement is full of pain and sharpness with 
          again superb string playing from this great orchestra. True to his concern 
          for that "impersonal survey" Barbirolli doesn't give in to the 
          "Music from far away" interlude that is at the heart of the movement. 
          In fact there's even a bright-eyed, optimistic quality to it. But then, 
          as you listen further, you realise a world of great feeling in the string 
          phrasing that only a Barbirolli could bring. When the main material 
          finally bursts back he shows it's been changed profoundly by what we 
          have just heard. It is almost as if the music is now commenting upon 
          itself. A remarkable feeling to convey and something Barbirolli does 
          in passages of his great recording of Elgar’s Falstaff. Here in Mahler 
          the Burleske unseats the Rondo and "goes for broke", as it 
          should. 
        
 
        
At the sessions Barbirolli insisted on recording the 
          last movement at night because "such music should not be played in daylight". 
          If he had been holding back until now in the fourth movement he lets 
          all the emotion come out at last. However, such is his sure touch that 
          even here it never gets the better of him. It never becomes tasteless 
          which under a lesser man it might have done. There's a rare nobility 
          in the first presentation of the great Adagio theme and listen to how 
          the strings dig into their bows and their traditions. The passage beginning 
          at bar 49, in effect the second presentation of the main adagio material, 
          ushers in a long passage which under Barbirolli is of such overwhelming 
          intensity that even after over thirty years of living with this great 
          recording it always leaves me quite shattered. The final climax to the 
          movement (and the entire work) has a desperate, questing quality. It 
          just remains to say that the coda - that long dying away - contains 
          phrasing by Barbirolli that will linger in your mind for hours afterwards. 
          Others play the closing pages slower. Others stretch them on the rack. 
          Barbirolli chooses, like Walter, to let his eloquence of phrasing, his 
          feeling for the breathing of a singer, to carry the day. 
        
 
        
I place this recording of the Ninth Symphony among 
          the very best ever issued along with Haitink on Philips (50 464 714) 
          reviewed here by myself and Simon Foster: 
        
 
        
http://www.musicweb-international.com/classrev/2001/May01/Mahler9.htm 
        
         
        
        
Klemperer on EMI (5 67036 2), Horenstein 
          on Vox (CDX2 5509) and Walter on Sony (SM2K 64452). 
          It just remains to say that this new issue of the Barbirolli preserves 
          what was an excellent recorded balance for home listening. Quite close 
          in, accentuating the odd error of playing caused, no doubt, by the long 
          takes, but endlessly illuminating for the details of the counterpoint 
          that it exposes. I have compared this newly remastered release with 
          the previous version (EMI 72435679252) and can find 
          no appreciable difference. Maybe on the very highest end of equipment 
          there would be but to these ears there is little to distinguish them 
          apart from a slight gain in clarity of detail in the quiet passages 
          favouring the new version. If you already have the first release I don’t 
          think there is any need to replace it. This new issue simply restores 
          the recording to the catalogue where it belongs and at medium price 
          on a single disc it represents excellent value. 
        
 
        
If you don’t already own this great recording, one 
          of the five or six best of this work ever taped, buy it immediately. 
          It should be on every Mahlerite’s shelf. 
        
 
        
        
Tony Duggan