Fibich’s status as one of the founders of the modern 
          Czech school has never been entirely secure. Though Jaroslav Jiranek’s 
          sleeve notes claim him unambiguously the greater affinities of the Leipzig 
          educated Fibich were arguably those of the German Romantic tradition. 
          Despite the wealth of Czech epic drama and balladry he set and the still 
          engrossing Hippodamia trilogy, he preferred, after all, the Germanicised 
          Zdenko to Zdeňek.  
        
 
        
The last volume of his Moods, Impressions and Reminiscences 
          contains numbers 360-376, played with heroic dedication by Slovak 
          pianist Marian Lapsansky. The Moods represent broadly Fibich’s generalized 
          love for his pupil Anezka Schulzova; Impressions, the earliest of the 
          cycle and dating from 1892-3, is a kind of musical eroticisation of 
          her body whilst Reminiscences relate more specifically to events and 
          incidents in their relationship – walks in the street, declarations 
          of love, diaristic reflections. To this extent then the Impressions 
          are lyrical, the Reminiscences narrative and Moods a fusion or coalescence 
          of the two. These specific details were first exposed by Zdeňek 
          Nejedly in a 1925 book that caused something of an outcry. It’s also 
          true that Fibich’s annotations and Schulzova’s own notes don’t always 
          coincide. Clearly elements of imaginative recall and displacements of 
          time and place were implicit in the creative process. 
        
 
        
The cycle as a whole comprises much that is in ternary 
          form and simple rondos; some structures are grouped together into suites, 
          others relate rhythmically or melodically or are musically cross-referenced 
          to other parts of the structure. It has a vast range and a broadly Schumannesque 
          impress. Elsewhere John Tyrrell has argued for a bridge of development 
          toward, and links with, Suk and Novák. 
        
 
        
The pieces played here are as lilting, affectionate, 
          pensive and joyful as one would expect. Most are less than three minutes 
          in length; only towards the end of this set of seventeen is there a 
          deeper note struck, with a five minute Largo succeeded immediately by 
          a nearly nine minute Funeral March – the psychological implications 
          are, I suppose, obvious, even though the huge cycle recovers to end 
          in a mood of geniality with three crisp and affectionate movements and 
          a concluding Allegretto. Jaroslav Jiranek hears a joke in 361, an allegro 
          scherzando, whereas I hear a sturdy, noble tune amid the scherzando 
          passages. The Andantino (363) is played with a hesitant and stuttering 
          direction by Lapsansky whilst the decisively "pointing" left 
          hand chords act resolutely to drive the music to its now confident conclusion. 
          Fibich was adept at employing dance rhythms and there’s a delightful 
          Quasi Polka to sweep the music onwards and to contrast with the immediately 
          following Moderato – which is a dance with alternate bars with a hobble 
          toed air of strong and weak accents. 
        
 
        
Similarly the density of construction is confirmed 
          by the intimate, languorous love song (367) followed by the piece popularly 
          known as The Storm on Lake Atter. This is a fractious and accent 
          straining passage with its suggestion of heavily falling rain and followed, 
          in its turn, by an Andante con moto depicting the calm after the storm. 
          This is further lightened by a delicious and gracious movement – seldom 
          was the direction grazioso less needed since Fibich seemingly 
          embedded grace in the notes themselves. The softening tone was in a 
          sense a chimera because Fibich now darkens the cycle still deeper with 
          an adagio. This utilises a kind of ground bass to create an atmosphere 
          both elliptical and elusive. Its inwardness leads to the long Funeral 
          march, itself internally contrasted to the March in (357) and full of 
          powerful chording and nobility – not sentimentality – of utterance. 
          And so the huge cycle lightens once again to conclude in freshness and 
          immediacy and lyric innocence. 
        
 
        
Lapsansky was recorded in the Martinů 
          Hall of the Liechtenstein Palace in Prague. Supraphon’s engineers have 
          ensured that he has a warm halo of support around the piano, allowing 
          him to bask in Fibich’s harmonies. The result is entirely sympathetic 
          and his playing is alive both to the elegance and the rhythmic 
          élan of the writing. He is a most welcome guide to the compulsive 
          autobiography of Fibich’s last decade. 
        
 
        
        
Jonathan Woolf