Not long ago I was reviewing a Brilliant Classics set (99351) 
        of Brendel’s Vanguard recordings (6 CDs), including his 1966 version of 
        K.271 with I Solisti di Zagreb conducted by Antonio Janigro. That performance 
        had a humming vitality which already marked it out. The remarkable thing 
        is that thirty-five years later Brendel has lost none the freshness of 
        his early maturity, and added a whole range of insights as well. 
         
        
I will just try to list a few of them. Shortly after 
          his entry in the first movement (his entry proper, not the few "surprise" 
          bars that the piano has, alone among Mozart concertos, at the very start), 
          his left-hand passage work glistens the first time round, but now it 
          takes into account all the shifts of harmony. Then, at the second subject, 
          while previously the left-hand was subdued to a barely-audible murmur 
          (the sort of balance between the hands we lesser mortals try to obtain), 
          now, without any exaggeration, he lets us hear how the melody is accompanied 
          by triplets whereas at its first appearance, on the orchestra, the accompaniment 
          consisted of simple quavers. 
        
 
        
I noted of the 1966 performance that the slow movement 
          did not attempt the hushed proto-romantic atmosphere of Géza 
          Anda’s recording, but enquired profoundly into the harmonic make-up 
          of the music. Now Brendel digs no less deeply into these intellectual 
          matters and provides a hushed proto-romantic atmosphere. For 
          this Sir Charles Mackerras deserves equal praise and in comparison I 
          must say that Janigro, joyfully positive in allegros, maybe lacked a 
          mite of poetry in a movement like this. 
        
 
        
In the finale I particularly noted the way Brendel 
          seemingly stumbles across the new minuet tempo as if it’s the last thing 
          he expected to find there. It is unusual, of course, but how 
          remarkable to maintain that sense of quixotic wonder after a lifetime 
          of playing the piece. 
        
 
        
Unquestionably, this new performance is the more searching, 
          the more complete of the two (and the recording is fuller and rounder, 
          though the old one is pretty good for the date), but you will learn 
          such a lot about the music by having both and listening to how 
          and why it is better that I can only urge you to get the Brilliant 
          Classics set (an incredible bargain in any case) as well. What I don’t 
          have to hand, unfortunately, is the recording from Brendel’s first cycle 
          with Marriner, so I am unable to report how many of these new insights 
          were already in place by then. 
        
 
        
Mackerras on his own, we know, is inclined to be a 
          brisk, vital Mozartian, but he shows his very great skill in K.503 by 
          seeing that Brendel’s rather broad tempi never drag or become heavy. 
          This is a performance that respects Mozart’s maestoso in the 
          first movement without ever trying to make the concerto sound like proto-Beethoven. 
          There is an Olympian calm about it all, and also great inventiveness 
          from Brendel as he refines and decorates the text and yet avoids any 
          sense of mannerism. His embellishments to the slow movement are fascinating 
          and I laughed out loud at one point in the finale. I must also mention 
          the first movement cadenza (by Brendel himself) where he goes quite 
          outrageously beyond any Mozartian harmonic scheme and yet remains totally 
          in keeping with the character of the music. 
        
 
        
Again, I haven’t been able to check out his earlier 
          versions, but in any case, while Brendel in his mid-seventies continues 
          to perform with such rightness and such character, even if you have 
          every other version of these two works that has ever been made, you 
          should get this one too. 
        
 
        
The notes by Wolfgang Rehm (in English, French and 
          German) are good though his insistence on the "brilliance" 
          of K.503 suggests that, as so often happens, he had not actually been 
          able to hear the performance he was writing for. 
        
 
        
        
Christopher Howell