How times change. When 
          I began collecting records in the 1960s Karel Ančerl’s “New World” 
          was available from Supraphon and was not highly regarded. Edward 
          Greenfield, in a Radio 3 survey of available "New Worlds" 
          even dismissed it as "a rather dull performance", and the 
          early editions of the Penguin Guide to Bargain Records had it well down 
          in the list. Nowadays there are critics 
          who rate it as the finest “New World” ever and most companies specialising 
          in the reissue of radio archive material try to have an Ančerl 
          “New World” in their books.  
        
 
        
Has it changed or have we? Well, it 
          can’t have changed so we must have. For one thing, in those days 
          a "normal" "New World" went in for a wide range 
          of speeds in the outer movements, with the flute theme in the first 
          movement, in particular, frequently bringing the music to a standstill. 
          Any new recording which did this would probably be condemned on principle 
          and certain red-blooded romantic recordings that were mainstays of the 
          LP catalogue, the Fricsay for instance, have seen their numbers go down. 
          At the other end of the spectrum was the Toscanini which blew away the 
          cobwebs of tradition and was widely venerated for doing so. This was 
          my introduction to the work and it took a long time before I could accept 
          and eventually prefer other more gentle but equally un-romantic views. 
          In this context a performance which played the score as faithfully as 
          Toscanini but without his fearsome energy risked being dismissed as 
          blandly unimaginative. 
        
 
        
The Lugano performance 
          recorded here is certainly a thoroughly energetic affair, with noisy 
          brass climaxes that have you wondering if Ančerl had been listening 
          to Toscanini. The first movement bowls along splendidly, the lyrical 
          melodies beautifully phrased with little concession 
          over tempo. The “largo” is taken at a flowing speed and is notable for 
          the way in which the “piů mosso” sections move on more than we 
          usually hear. However, though I wouldn’t call this bland, it seems to 
          me to lack the spell-binding qualities of another recently revived 
          performance, also underestimated in its day, that by Nikolai Malko. 
          Timings are not everything but Malko, in the 12’20" of his 1956 
          Philharmonia recording (CZS 7243 5 75121 2), let alone in the 13’39" 
          of his quite miraculously beautiful 1948 
          Danish State Radio Orchestra recording (DACOCD 549-550) finds so much 
          more in the music than Ančerl in his 10’27”.  
        
 
        
If there is a movement in which the Czechs seem to 
          possess some secret denied to the rest of us it is the third, where 
          they quite rightly recognise that the trio is more of a fast sousedskà 
          than a waltz – hear how the third beat is sprung. The finale is also 
          very fine with all Dvořák’s references to themes from earlier 
          movements beautifully balanced against each other and sounding properly 
          symphonic for once. I reacted in a similar way to Malko’s finale, however 
          (this time with a preference for the Philharmonia version) and felt 
          that his more spacious approach gave one more time to savour the music. 
          So it was disconcerting to discover that 
          there is only 2 seconds’ difference between them! Checking them side 
          by side I concluded that Ančerl gives the impression of more speed 
          because he sometimes moves ahead impetuously, and draws back slightly 
          in the clarinet theme, whereas Malko’s steady beat has the effect 
          that after a time you don’t notice the tempo at all and simply hear 
          the music. I also noticed that, while the Czech strings may be wonderful 
          no one could accuse their trumpeter of subtlety and their clarinettist 
          lacks the liquid beauty of the London player’s tone. 
        
 
        
All in all, then, while this is certainly a fine "New 
          World" it doesn’t seem to me to possess those special qualities 
          that its provenance might lead you to expect. The recording is really 
          very good for the date. Alas, at the beginning of the "Bartered 
          Bride" overture the engineers seem to have been caught still positioning 
          the mikes and there are some bumps and squeaks during the opening bars. 
          A sizzling performance, maybe just a little too fast for ideal clarity, 
          given the reverberant acoustic. 
        
 
        
The truly enthralling 
          performance here is actually the Mussorgsky, a swift and vividly characterised 
          reading. It is clear from the outset that Ančerl is not going to 
          hang around and in some of the faster movements – “Limoges” and “The 
          Hut on Fowl’s Legs” – the players take off in flights of collective 
          frenzy, while this is one of the rare performances in which the "Old 
          Castle" does not seem too long. The two Jews are thoroughly acrimonious 
          and the control over the dynamics in "Catacombs" is notable. 
        
 
        
Fine as all this is, in 
          the last resort I can’t quite claim buried treasure status for it. Ančerl’s 
          interpretations of these works are already known in stereo versions, 
          and he was pretty consistent between one performance and another. New 
          additions to the Ančerl discography 
          will be warmly welcomed and can I point out that, if a Dvořák “Te 
          Deum” is not available from Czech sources, Italian Radio have a Turin 
          performance of it with Marcella Pobbe and Nicola Rossi-Lemeni as soloists, 
          in which he drew string playing from the local orchestra of a 
          vibrancy not far behind that of the CPO itself. 
          Christopher Howell