Bach’s keyboard partitas were his first published works, 
          his opus 1. These six suites were actually the last suites Bach wrote 
          for keyboard, and owe a great deal to French influence. These are relatively 
          popular works, and have been recorded by most of the world’s leading 
          pianists. Christopher Czaja Sager gives an interesting reading of these 
          works, and, unlike most pianists, gives the partitas an additional level 
          of colour by playing them on three different pianos. 
        
 
        
Sager plays the first partita at a relatively slow 
          tempo, similar to Wolfgang Rubsam’s interpretation on Naxos. This approach 
          is quite enjoyable to some, since it brings out totally different elements 
          of the music than when it is played at a faster tempo as most performers 
          do. Sager’s choice of a Yamaha piano gives this, and the third, fifth 
          and sixth partitas, an interesting sound. Less resonant than the more 
          common Steinway, this piano has an attractive tone that fits will with 
          some of the more lively movements. 
        
 
        
Sager plays the sixth partita in a similar fashion 
          - the opening toccata is slow and sinuous, and he gives it a more improvisatory 
          sound than many other pianists. His overall performance of this partita 
          is excellent; his playing truly blossoms in this idiom. 
        
 
        
The second partita benefits from a fine-sounding Bösendorfer 
          piano, with even less resonance than the Yamaha. This piano is more 
          compact both in size (2 metres, compared to 2.74 and 2.74 for the others), 
          and sound. Sager plays this partita much faster than the others, and 
          exudes less conviction. The allemande is very attractive, but the faster 
          movements, such as the final capriccio, sound a bit too inflexible. 
        
 
        
The main problem with this set is that Sager takes 
          a very uneven approach to the partitas. While each individual work is 
          coherent, there is no overall vision. His differences in tempi - from 
          the relatively slow first partita to the fairly rapid fourth - show 
          that he does not see this as a set of works, but rather as a group of 
          individual, unrelated suites. Some of the partitas are excellent, others 
          just good. This is a set worth discovering, especially at its budget 
          price, but the listener should not expect to appreciate all of the works 
          in the same way. 
          Kirk McElhearn