Rostropovich’s playing is simply stunning, and Giulini’s 
          accompaniments are characteristically dignified and always attentive 
          to his soloist’s needs. Combined, they summon up perfectly the quasi-nostalgic 
          sound world of this music. The London Philharmonic at the time of recording 
          (1977) was at a high point in its history, and how it shows. Textures 
          are glowing (and expertly balanced and moulded by Giulini’s expert ear) 
          and solo contributions are uniformly impressive: how to single out any 
          one is a problem. Perhaps the lyrical horn solo in the first movement 
          exposition, or the woodwind contributions in the second movement?. 
        The exact blend of musicianship present in Rostropovich 
          seems ideally suited to this piece. All the moments of lyrical magic 
          one might expect from this source are here in abundance (the slow movement 
          is mesmeric), but also the virtuosity displayed is jaw-dropping and 
          yet at once completely at the service of the music. Tempi, as in all 
          great performances, persuade one that they could not be otherwise (for 
          example, the ‘ma non troppo’ qualifier to its ‘Adagio’ is heeded so 
          the music flows easily and naturally). Rostropovich’s playing reaches 
          dizzyingly impassioned heights in the Finale. In fact, the only real 
          reservation about this account of the Dvorák comes with the recording 
          quality (David Mottley was the producer, Neville Boyling the engineer). 
          Despite being typical of its period in its inviting warmth (though with 
          a slight muddying of detail in the lower registers), there is some uncomfortable 
          spotlighting of solo contributions: listen to the bassoon countermelody 
          beginning at 6'50 in the finale, for example. 
        Rostropovich himself chose the Saint-Saëns as 
          the coupling. His love of the piece comes through strongly. Possibly 
          this was a controversial choice, but the piece is not without its fair 
          share of influential fans. Shostakovich referred to it as the best of 
          the ‘great’ concertos for balance, length and shape and reputedly said 
          he preferred it even over the Dvorák (despite its charms, I cannot 
          agree!). Casals was another great performer who held the piece in his 
          repertoire. 
        The Cello Concerto No. 1 was premiered in 1873 by Auguste 
          Tolbecque at the Societé des Concerts du Conservatoire in Paris. 
          Rostropovich actually made his concerto debut with this concerto at 
          the age of 13, so maybe that accounts for its special place in his affections. 
          The score is full of joy with life, from the arresting opening (a single 
          orchestral chord followed by an amazing flourish for soloist) through 
          the minuet-like Allegro con moto with its polished accompaniment over 
          which Rostropovich floats heavenly - this movement is delightful - to 
          the more shifting moods of the finale. In lesser hands, one might be 
          tempted to be dismissive of this concerto, but for its duration Rostropovich 
          refuses to let negative thoughts even enter one’s head. The coupling 
          of these two concertos is a remarkably successful one, and one which 
          makes a straight play-through of the disc a positively life-enhancing 
          experience.
        
        
        
        Colin Clarke