HERBERT HOWELLS
	Piano Concerto No.1 in C minor Op.4
	Piano Concerto No.2 in C major Op.39
	Penguinski
	
 Howard Shelley, piano
	BBC Symphony Orchestra/Richard Hickox
	
 CHANDOS CHAN
	9874
	Crotchet  
	
	
	
	
	
	
	Herbert Howells is generally best-remembered for his organ works and his
	choral music which includes some large-scale choral/orchestral pieces. One
	tends to forget that quite a number of his early works were either instrumental
	or orchestral ones.
	
	CHANDOS's earlier releases (Orchestral Works Volume 1:
	CHAN
	9410  Volume 2:
	CHAN
	9557) together with the present disc help put things straight again and
	make one regret that, for whatever reasons, Howells did not write any purely
	orchestral music after about 1940. (Incidentally Music for a Prince of 1948
	is just a reworking of two movements from the early suite The Bs.)
	
	Howells' three big orchestral works - if one excepts the magnificent
	Concerto for Strings - are concertante pieces: the two piano concertos
	and the masterly and long-forgotten Fantasia for cello & orchestra.
	Moreover the First Piano Concerto was completed in 1913 when Howells was
	still at the RCM. Stanford conducted its first - and possibly last - performance
	with Arthur Benjamin as soloist in 1914 at the Queen's Hall. Ivor Gurney
	obviously loved the piece and longed to hear it again. He was never to do
	so. The First Piano Concerto is a most ambitious piece lasting over half
	an hour cast in the grand romantic mould with a lengthy first movement including
	an extensive cadenza, a long meditative slow movement and a more animated
	finale. One might be forgiven for hearing echoes from Rachmaninov, Schumann
	or Brahms in this youthful work which already displays a remarkable orchestral
	flair and assurance in its handling of long paragraphs. Quite an achievement
	for a composer still in his early twenties.
	
	The score of the First Piano Concerto used for the present recording was
	prepared by John Rutter who completed the missing final bars and to correct
	some errors in the parts and score.
	
	The Second Piano Concerto, of which this is the second recording (Hyperion
	CDA66610),
	shows a considerable advance on No. 1. By now Howells had found his way into
	music and was fully master of his trade. He devised his Second Piano Concerto
	in the grand romantic manner although this now clearly Howells' throughout.
	The first performance was not altogether a success. The soloist, Harold Samuel,
	disliked it and the conductor, Malcolm Sargent, was not particularly fond
	of it. This disastrous premiere came as a blow to Howells and probably caused
	him to cease writing orchestral music.
	
	Howells described this Concerto as having "deliberate tunes all the way"
	and "being jolly in feeling, and attempting to get to the point as quickly
	as may be". Of course, with Howells, things are not always as simple as that.
	The music of the concerto has many Howells fingerprints but the accusation
	of "modernism" heard at the time of the first performance does not hold if
	put into the context of the present times.
	
	This bright, brilliant and dynamic piece may now be enjoyed for what it is
	- a beautifully crafted, colourful work likely to appeal to audiences that
	enjoy, say, Ireland's Piano Concerto or Prokofiev's Third Piano Concerto.
	There is not much to choose between the present performance and that by Kathryn
	Stott with the Royal Liverpool Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Vernon
	Handley (HYPERION CDA 66610 ). Hickox tends to favour somewhat slower tempi
	in the first two movements while he makes the Finale really joyful.
	
	Stravinsky's Petrushka was a lasting influence on Howells' orchestral
	music which often has some sort of concertante piano part. Clearly
	Penguinski is yet another homage to Stravinsky (even in its title!).
	This short ballet is a delightful trifle well worth hearing. It is a fine
	example of Howells at his most extravert. It was written for a visit made
	by the then Prince of Wales to the RCM. Incidentally Paul Spicer in his excellent
	insert notes mentions 1933 as the date of this visit whereas Christopher
	Palmer (in "Herbert Howells: A Celebration" Thames 1996 2nd edition) mentions
	1929. Can anyone shed any light on this small documentary point?
	
	Howard Shelley plays with assurance and affection, and receives a superb
	support from the BBC Symphony Orchestra conducted by Richard Hickox. So I
	do not hesitate in recommending this most welcome addition to Howells' steadily
	expanding discography, mainly thanks to enterprising record companies such
	as CHANDOS and HYPERION. I hope there will soon be a fourth volume.
	
	Hubert CULOT
	    
  
        
A belated response to a question posed 
          by Hubert Culot in his review of the disc including the brief ballet 
          'Penguinski' by Herbert Howells. Hubert asks about the discrepancy in 
          dating this work between Paul Spicer's booklet note (1933) and Christopher 
          Palmer's book 'Herbert Howells: a celebration' (1929). Spicer is correct. 
          I compiled the works list for Christopher's book as an ofshoot of a 
          long and ongoing project to document Howells' music. Penguinski is one 
          of several works by Howells about which there has been some confusion, 
          a situation often exacerbated by the innacuracy of the composer's own 
          memory in his old age. We took the date from an earlier source, based 
          on a conversation with Howells himself. At the time all that existed 
          of the piece was an undated and incomplete sketch. We knew that it had 
          been written for a specific occasion at the Royal College of Music, 
          but the actual date of that concert was not unearthed until after the 
          publication of Christoper's book. Later still, a complete and intact 
          set of parts was uncovered - presumably those from the first and only 
          performance - and this formed the basis of the score that was made up 
          for the Hickox recording. Needless to say there were discrepancies between 
          the parts and the sketch, but we took the parts to represent Howells' 
          last thoughts on the matter.
        
Paul Andrews
        
p.d.andrews@btinternet.com