Aureole etc.

Golden Age singers

Nimbus on-line

Faure songs
Charlotte de Rothschild (soprano);

  Founder: Len Mullenger
Classical Editor: Rob Barnett

Niels GADE (1817-1890)
Symphony no. 4 in B flat, op. 20
Symphony no. 7 in F, op. 45
Concert Overture no. 3, op. 14

Danish National Radio Symphony Orchestra/Christopher Hogwood
Recorded in the Danish Radio Concert Hall, Copenhagen
Rec 26.2 & 1.3.1997 (op. 20), 6 & 9.4.2001 (op. 45), 9-10.4.2001 (op. 14)
CHANDOS CHAN 9957 [67.15?]

Crotchet   AmazonUK   AmazonUS  Amazon recommendations

I listened to the 4th Symphony first and thought what an entrancing work this is. After the briefest of introductions the Allegro Vivace starts almost imperceptibly with a couple of drone basses that still seem to be in the previous tempo, but it is soon swirling away and generates much vitality (and some whole-hearted if at times scrappy playing), with some enchanting scoring in second subject territory and the clearest of designs. The slow movement has much warm, romantic feeling and, again, some delightful scoring. If I began wondering whether the theme itself was quite as memorable as those of the first movement, the brief movement was practically over by that time. The featherdown opening of the scherzo had me pricking up my ears; this is an absolute charmer. The finale? I have remarked before that Gade at times spoilt an otherwise good symphony with a four-square finale. Exuberant swirlings rather than full-scale themes are the name of the game here, with just a touch of gentler contrasting material to stop it from becoming over-emphatic. If you look on this as a late example of a Haydn-type symphony where the weight is in the first movement and the finale is a brilliant send-off, then the symphony is wholly convincing. I was also left puzzled that I had bought, and listened to, the Järvi version when it came out, but I didnít remember having been struck by it in this way, but more of that in a moment.

About the 7th I was not so sure. The first movement is a warm-hearted affair, with some rich-hued scoring and a clear shape (though I felt Hogwood never obtained a properly defined enunciation of the principal theme, the repeated notes of which gel into one another). The second and third seemed to lack distinctive material and rather outstayed their welcome. The finale presents a wider range of themes than in other such movements from Gade, but fails to marshal them into a single culminating statement.

I also felt that Hogwood was rather hustling things, and that the symphony might have said rather more if it had been given space for its themes really to speak. Imagine my dismay when I got the Jarvi alternative down and saw that his timings are shorter still in every movement. But itís not quite like that. With a leaner orchestral sound, very taut phrasing and an unerring sense of pace, Järvi actually makes the symphony convincing in all four movements. This is a masterly piece of conducting.

Järviís 4th is no less so, but in this case Hogwoodís less careful but buoyant approach seems to tap better the natural exuberance of the piece. The Concert Overture no. 3 receives a first recording. It is an impressive, bardic-toned piece, perhaps a little over-insistent; maybe it would have responded better to Järvi-treatment.

This is one of those moments when the critic feels rather helpless. It looks as though you will need Järvi in no. 7 and Hogwood in no. 4. The trouble is, both cycles are coupled differently, so you will have to opt for one or other conductor all through; in which case Järvi remains unchallenged since my slight preference for Hogwood in no. 4 is nothing compared to my very definite preference for Järvi in no. 7. Also BISís cleaner sound is preferable to Chandosís more reverberant, sometimes brass-heavy textures.

Christopher Howell

Return to Index

Untitled Document

Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.