SHOSTAKOVICH
	  Symphony No.5 in D minor
	  JANACEK: 
	  Taras Bulba - Rhapsody For Orchestra
	   Vienna Pro Musica Conducted
	  by Jascha Horenstein
 Vienna Pro Musica Conducted
	  by Jascha Horenstein 
	   (Recordings from 1952 and
	  1955) Vox Legends Vox
	  7803
 (Recordings from 1952 and
	  1955) Vox Legends Vox
	  7803
	  Amazon
	  US mid-price
	  
	  
	   
	  
	  In his series of recordings for Vox in the 1950s Horenstein blended the familiar
	  with the unfamiliar. In addition to Beethoven, Brahms, Mozart and Dvorak
	  he made pioneering recordings of Mahler, Bruckner, Schoenberg and Stravinsky.
	  The two works on this reissue fall into that category and in the case of
	  the Shostakovich Fifth Symphony we have what must have been one of the first,
	  if not the first, LP recording of the work. In 1952 the symphony was
	  only fifteen years old, remember, so this could have been the first time
	  admirers of this composer were able to hear this work at home without
	  interruption when they wanted. And I do believe there is a special quality
	  to early or first recordings. Unencumbered by routine and filled with zeal
	  to do the right thing by a composer, they are often much fresher sounding
	  than later efforts, analogous to newly painted canvases even though unfamiliarity
	  might bring some insecurity in playing.
	  
	  In the first movement the overriding impression given by Horenstein is a
	  refreshing need to press forward with the orchestra responding to a need
	  to explore the score, almost as if they are aware of setting down a reference
	  for others to follow. There is no attempt by Horenstein to weigh down the
	  music with too much despondency which helps at the movement's central crisis
	  where his unerring sense of the structure of the movement means he builds
	  with the hand of a master engineer allied to edginess. The aftermath of this,
	  though relatively consoling, doesn't give as much comfort as it can and in
	  that accentuates an uneasy mood. In the second movement Mahlerian influences
	  appear in Shostakovich's writing. He had attended Mahler performances by
	  Horenstein in Russia around the time of writing this work that makes this
	  recording a document of even greater interest. Interestingly, however, Horenstein
	  seems careful to stress the Shostakovich quality to this movement. Notice
	  how the well-balanced mono recording also catches just about everything from
	  the growls of the lower brass to the harp and the string slides. Following
	  this Horenstein reads the elegiac third movement "straight". What emerges
	  is intensely moving for being quite cold. I also had a strong feeling, stronger
	  than usual, that the central crisis of this third movement is a counterpart
	  to that of the first. The passage immediately afterwards is "argued" by
	  Horenstein, conveying a feeling that even he isn't yet quite sure how it
	  should go. Again the impression coming over is that this early in the work's
	  history interpreters are still feeling their way. By the end of the movement,
	  however, an intimacy enters and I couldn't help but be reminded that this
	  music emerged from a time when the Russian political climate was very harsh.
	  Here it is being played against a background where the Cold War was at its
	  most frozen in a city closer than most to the Iron Curtain. With Shostakovich
	  you cannot escape these impressions.
	  
	  Horenstein's reading of the last movement is, by the nature of its recording
	  date, utterly without overtones of trying to read what Shostakovich might
	  have "really" been trying to say. The close therefore has a genuine nobility;
	  an enhancing of the spirit whose meaning can be read in any number of ways.
	  The early recording copes well with the demands the score makes on it with
	  a well-balanced, honest sound picture of an orchestra anxious to give their
	  best. The orchestra hiding behind the name "Vienna Pro Musica" on this disc
	  is, by the way, the Vienna Symphony Orchestra.
	  
	  No less important or enjoyable is the recording of Janacek's Taras Bulba
	  from 1955. The recording quality isn't quite as good as that for the Shostakovich
	  in being closer and less atmospheric. Throughout the performance Horenstein
	  is adept at seeming to tell a developing story. In fact the whole piece emerges
	  with the fluency of a film soundtrack, changing from moment to moment. In
	  the latter animated passage of The Death of Andriy there is a wonderful
	  truculence to Horenstein's craggy sound palette that is then balanced by
	  brilliance to the lyricism against which it is pitted. The Prophecy and Death
	  builds to a grand climax with the final string peroration splendidly projected
	  and within the texture rather than outside it. This is as distinguished a
	  reading as that of the Shostakovich Symphony and is a very generous coupling
	  for a work that usually appears alone.
	  
	  Reviewer
	  
	  Tony Duggan
	  
	  Shostakovich:
	  
	  Performance: 
	   
	  
	  Sound:
	   
	  
	  Janacek:
	  
	  Performance: 
	   
	  
	  Sound: 
	  