BOOK REVIEW
	  
	  An Introduction to the Life and York of Sir Granville Bantock
	  by Vincent Budd
	  
	  
	  This is quite an excellent resumé of the life and work of a most
	  distinguished English composer and conductor; it succinctly fulfils its specific
	  aim to be an introduction, yet does not claim to be more than that; in this
	  way it will undoubtedly appeal to a wide cross section of musicians and those
	  who have a particular regard for English music of the earlier part of the
	  twentieth century. It does not set out to be an exhaustive, analytical or
	  philosophical study, yet paradoxically, for this very reason, it succeeds
	  in being a most readable and engaging dissertation: it wastes no words, does
	  not offer speculation as to any hidden meanings behind the music and, rather
	  like Bantock himself, comes to the point in a clear an unmistakable way.
	  One of its considerable assets is the inclusion of some hitherto little-known
	  photographs, several of which, almost more than any long-winded verbiage
	  might have done, tell us about Bantock the men.
	  
	  An admitted self-interest ought to be declared: in the mid-1930's the present
	  reviewer, then merely a boy of about thirteen or so, first came under the
	  spell of Bantock's music after hearing a performance of "Prometheus Unbound"
	  by the then very celebrated Foden's Motor Works Band, conducted by Fred Mortimer.
	  Even at that relatively inexperienced age and awareness of harmonic subtlety,
	  there was something inordinately fascinating about Bantock's music, especially
	  - at the time -
	  the seemingly very individual flavour of the composer's
	  harmonic vocabulary as it came over to someone just beginning to get to grips
	  with the study of basic diatonic harmony and counterpoint. Bantock thus became
	  an early enthusiasm of this writer, so that a chance for him to be introduced
	  to the composer was indeed an honour, and an occasion, still most vividly
	  and happily remembered. Some years later, taking part in a performance of
	  the evocative "Hebridean Symphony" whilst a member of the Scottish National
	  Orchestra reinforced this youthful enthusiasm, and the only personal regret
	  has been that more such opportunities have not been forthcoming. However,
	  there seems to be a parallel with Arnold Bax in many respects.
	  
	  It is a widely recognised phenomenon that enthusiasts -
	  for whatever human activity -
	  tend to be puzzled why others do not invariably share
	  their vociferous championing. I used to wonder why both Bax and Bantock were
	  not as widely and frequently performed as I would have thought they ought
	  to be. It was not until the Bax centenary in 1983 when almost the whole corpus
	  of his music did get a fair re-assessment that one began, however reluctantly,
	  to realise why such neglect had set in. It must seem churlish and, once having
	  been so besotted by a particular composer, indeed more than a bit cruel,
	  later to have to admit that one's youthful ardour has cooled. As a young
	  and ardent admirer of Vaughan Villiams, he once said to
	  me:..."It is very kind of
	  you to say how much you admire my music, but, in another thirty or forty
	  years time you may find that it might not appeal to you quite so much as
	  it does just now, but when that day comes you must not think you are being
	  disloyal to me, for you will find that very often one's tastes change as
	  the years go by"....
	  
	  This probably explains why some composers go out of fashion; at one time
	  they might well have been sincerely and widely appreciated for what seemed
	  just right at that moment; but another greater creative imagination comes
	  along, or overtakes them and is ultimately seen to be the more lasting expression
	  of a particular period in history. In the case of Bantock and Bax, and other
	  equally deserving names, the real and lasting voice of English music was
	  ultimately recognised as that, above all, of Elgar. Perhaps Bantock's
	  once-fascinating orientalism, or Bax's celtic muse could never quite match
	  up to that indefinable, but yet just so clinching an expression of the English
	  spirit as Elgar or Vaughan Williams. Every age seems, in the last resort,
	  to choose or unconsciously recognise just one voice to represent a particular
	  era. This has happened throughout musical -- as indeed
	  any other kind - of artistic history. So, much as I still
	  admire Bantock, as I do Bax, I can appreciate just why he is no longer
	  universally acknowledged, as enthusiasts such as Mr Budd would like
	  to believe ought to be the case.
	  
	  Mr Budd's booklet is very readable, but it has to be pointed out that there
	  are not a few spelling mistakes which hint at a kind of malapropism suggesting
	  the author has not wholly understood the subtle meaning of a word:.,. "now
	  in his element with unreigned energy"... (surely it should be
	  unreined ?) or: ... "with still no
	  'serious' academic post in the offering"... (when it ought to be the
	  offing ?> and: . . . "what
	  real scholarly extent is a mute question" (a moot question
	  ?)
	  
	  ... Similarly the author lapses into an unlovely vernacular:
	  ..."his pal William Wallace" or: . .
	  ."he re-entered civvy street".... (suggesting
	  that an apprenticeship at the RAM was some kind of 'military' service ?)
	  Additionally he appears to coin some words of his own: 'opinatry',
	  'blinkeredness' and so on... and while students in their class notes for
	  a degree dissertation might, as a kind of shorthand, write: "Mid-Cl9th" for
	  "nineteenth century", this is not usual practice in good printed literature.
	  While quoting the full names of some conductors and other recorded performers
	  of Bantock's music, (Anthony Collins, Dolf van der Linden, Julian Lloyd Webber,
	  for example), the brass band conductors are merely quoted with a kind of
	  army-nominal-roll style prosaic initial: 'G.Brand' 'J.Watson' and 'C.Lamb'
	  but Sir Harry Mortimer, an honour, alas! that Kr. Mortimer, OBE was
	  never accorded, despite numerous recommendations to a succession of prime
	  ministers.  
	  
	  Still, this is a useful contribution to our knowledge of a neglected English
	  composer, and is to be commended
	  
	  Reviewer
	  
	  Arthur Butterworth
	  
	  and Gary Dalkin adds 
	  
	  Vincent Budd is an enthusiastic evangelist for the life and music of Sir
	  Granville Bantock, and though this is an amateur publication, he is currently
	  working on a full-length biography of his subject. This is clearly long overdue,
	  as the bibliographical note at the back of the booklet informs us that there
	  are only two books about Bantock in existence: a long out-of-print volume
	  published as early as 1915, when the composer still had another 31 years
	  to live, and a 'personal portrait' by the composer's daughter Myrrha, issued
	  in 1972, also out of print.
	  
	  Given that anyone who goes to the trouble to seek out this booklet must have
	  at least a passing interest in Bantock, Budd does spend rather too long preaching
	  to the converted. With only 23 pages of main text (there are 7 pages of good
	  b/w photos, 6 pages of annotated discography, notes and prefatory pages making
	  up the total) more concentration on the actual facts of Bantock's long life
	  and extensive careers as composer and academic would not have gone amiss.
	  A little more proof-reading would have helped: there are actually some words
	  scored through half-way down page 31, and some of the extensive, over-wrought
	  sentences might have been scaled down. I like Budd's enthusiasm for a subject
	  he considers unfairly disregarded, and I have every sympathy - I have argued
	  along exactly the same lines myself regarding film music, science fiction
	  and Christianity - but lines such as the following don't help.
	  
	  "If the recent 50th anniversary of his death was met with only
	  minimal recognition in the hegemonic echelons of our musical polity
"
	  
	  The sentiments are laudable, and yes, it is perfectly grammatical English,
	  but it comes over as pretentious, pompous and ponderous. Not the prose to
	  win anyone who thinks Bantock old-fashioned and irrelevant. Of course, I'm
	  the kettle calling the pot black here, guilty myself of over over-writing,
	  over-enthusing and over-indulging in attacks on various establishments. I
	  also know how difficult it is to get all the mistakes out of self-published
	  work, so having delivered all the criticisms above, I'm now going to ask
	  you to forget them.
	  
	  What Vincent Budd has done is delivered a small service to British music,
	  as hopefully his finished full-scale biography of Bantock will do a greater
	  service. He has given an outline of the composer's life from 1868 to 1946,
	  listed the major works and offered brief opinions on a whole range of pieces,
	  and given food for thought and an encouragement to buy those few available
	  Bantock CDs. In other words, to explore for oneself. Actually I have the
	  CD which couples the Pagan Symphony with Bax' Tintagel and the Northern Ballads
	  2 & 3. Its BBC Radio Classics 15656 91592 with the BBC Philharmonic conducted
	  by Sir Edward Downes. Available at budget price, the 1984 recording is an
	  excellent companion to Budd's booklet, and the music is thoroughly engaging.
	  
	  Note: The author is the editor of the Bantock Society Journal and may be
	  contacted at Seallaidh Bharraidh, Polochar, the Isle of South Uist, the Outer
	  Hebrides, HS8 5TR, or by phone at 01878 700755
	  
	  The Bantock Society web-site
	  
	  The Chairman is Mr Ron Bleach, 48 Ravenswood Road, Redland, Bristol, BS6
	  6BT
	  
	  Reviewer - Gary S. Dalkin
	  
	  The book is only available direct from the author. It is priced £6 00,
	  plus 50p p&p (Europe 75p, ROW £1). If you would like to order a
	  copy please include your details, enclose it with your cheque, payable to
	  'Vincent Budd', and post to 2 Seallaidh Bharraidh, Polochar, Isle of South
	  Uist, Outer Hebrides, SCOTLAND HS8 5TR Please write clearly.