This set seems to have had little or no attention in record review magazines.
	  I recall seeing a passing (and, I think, approving) reference to it in a
	  Gramophone overview of Sibelius cycles. Apart from that nothing - rather
	  like the Abravanel and Watanabe cycles. Perhaps this goes in Sanderling's
	  case with the recordings having been a product of East Germany in the days
	  before Unification. It would have been so easy for this valuable quartet
	  of discs to be allowed to slip away but thanks are due to EDEL for keeping
	  it in the public eye.
	  
	  Sanderling's Nordic credentials are certainly in order. He was born in 1912
	  and trained in Berlin. He emigrated to Russia in 1936 conducting in turn
	  the Moscow Radio Orchestra and then the Kharkov PO until in 1942 he was appointed
	  as joint permanent conductor of the Leningrad PO with Mravinsky. Sanderling
	  left Leningrad in 1960 for a long association with the Berlin SO (which only
	  ended in 1977) and the Dresden Staatskapelle.
	  
	  Sanderling's Sibelius cycle is distinguished by an attention to point and
	  detail. The second symphony feels lovingly moulded and crafted with notable
	  control of the pizzicato (I 2.21) and finely lathed tension in the second
	  movement. There is a slight hint of vintage Russian vibrato in the French
	  horns - a ripeness that suits very well in this repertoire. In the finale
	  the heaven-vaunting trumpets have a very human self-questioning edge. These
	  fine features carry over into the final pages but with a suggestion of languor
	  that falls over the edge into tiredness.
	  
	  The Third (1904-07) makes the transition from the Tchaikovskian romance of
	  the first two symphonies. A chill flame lights up the third and the sixth
	  symphonies (my favourites among the cycle). Sanderling is warmly in sympathy
	  with these works catching the long march and trudge of the first movement
	  (Leningrad's snow still on Sanderling's boots?) with a sharply accented and
	  chiselled approach. So a cold flame but it is still a flame. I noted a small
	  tape 'bump' at 1:27 in the first movement - a very small blemish in this
	  context.
	  
	  The first symphony resounds with mordant string surges,
	  Nutcracker-like enchantment, some stunning brass playing and the easily
	  unrolling chiff-chaff of the strings and woodwind (e.g. 10.50 I). The pizzicato
	  are punched out with the agreeable impact at the end of the first movement.
	  The hushed fast waves of sound underpinning the horns are done to perfection
	  in the second movement (3.30). In the third movement Sanderling demonstrates
	  that he knows how to knot and twist the tension (1.36). The finale is rather
	  too clipped and petulantly light-weight to be completely successful. More's
	  the pity as this is a performance that otherwise compares well with the
	  'market-leaders' including Colin Davis.
	  
	  En Saga's etched string wavelets at the start are extremely well done and
	  the mesmeric string ostinati superbly look forward to Night Ride and
	  Sunrise. Sanderling's account of the latter is extremely successful:
	  buzzing with blade-sharp definition and with an impressive depth of recording.
	  Sanderling stands here as the conjurer of clouds and enchanter of winds.
	  In Finlandia bombast is conquered with some savagely barking brass
	  and at 3.35 the horns are simply magnificent.
	  
	  The Sixth Symphony has a coolly unfolding flute contribution and cocooned
	  strings (I), the motoric propulsion of the strings utterly banishing any
	  languor. In the finale Sanderling and Sibelius conjure great reserves of
	  detail and at the same time catch the spirit of remote village churches and
	  crudely fervent hymn-singing. The second movement, more than ever in this
	  recording, seems to have much in common with the incidental music.
	  
	  The Seventh Symphony is the least successful of the set. In it Sanderling's
	  propensity for caressing detail undermines the tension. All in all, and in
	  total contrast to his Leningrad partner (Mravinsky) in this work, there is
	  little sense of steely or adamantine control.
	  
	  The fourth symphony is projected with throatily clipped style. The recording
	  is natural - decidedly unglamorous. It is taken rather steadily but this
	  seems to work well. This is not the equal of Colin Davis's Boston set (Philips)
	  but it is an estimable recording which will consistently please. Many corners
	  and crests emerge with satisfying eminence and clarity. The finale is very
	  good indeed with the studied faltering of the cello and violin solo statements
	  striding out. There is also, about the work, a gruff volcanic romance quite
	  unlike the Karajan DG performance through which I grew to know this symphony.
	  Sanderling and his orchestra are excellent at these rock-steady ostinati
	  and this foundation pays off time and again.
	  
	  The fifth symphony is, for Sanderling, typically natural in approach and
	  sound. 'New' details float out and upwards all the time, for example the
	  bassoon solo in I at 7.09. This is very special indeed. Sanderling is in
	  touch with the hymn-like aspects of the second movement and the wintry serenade
	  work of the woodwind is allowed to register clearly. The strings seem to
	  emphasise the affinity of the writing with Tchaikovsky's String Serenade.
	  Tension darts, hums, bubbles and streams (try 4.34 if you would like to sample
	  the ethereal and the tense hand-in-hand) through the finale. The epic horn
	  cradle-song, so well articulated, makes this an extremely satisfying performance.
	  
	  The trilingual (German, English, French) notes give us the essentials.
	  
	  The stereo competition is fierce. The emerging Naxos Petri Sakari set looks
	  to be very promising and I have a very high regard for Berglund's Royal Classics
	  set with the Bournemouth SO. The latter happens to be from the same vintage
	  as the Sanderling. In fairness the Berlin Classics set would not have been
	  my very first choice but I would feel privileged to have learnt and enjoyed
	  the symphonies through them. If you can tolerate mono then the
	  Beulah Collins set is well
	  worth your attention. I would refer readers to Gerald Fenech's
	  overview of the Sibelius symphonies
	  for a broader view.
	  
	  How to characterise this set? Sanderling glories in detail. He can tend towards
	  a steadiness that occasionally decays the pulse and thrust of the music.
	  Often however his unglamorous approach brings out details that others gloss
	  and chamfer. He is not afraid to allow these Northern flowers and trees to
	  bloom at a natural pace. He is no stranger to drama but will not fabricate
	  it unnaturally. Tension is exposed rather than created. This set is in many
	  ways a most agreeable library staple and conductor, orchestra and recording
	  all lend themselves to long-term listening rather than immediate emotional
	  returns and short-term neon high-drama.
	  
	  Reviewer
	  
	  Rob Barnett