FRANZ LISZT 
	  Symphonic Poem Les Preludes
	  Fantasia on Hungarian Folk Melodies
	  Hungarian Rhapsodies nos. 2 and 4. (Shura Cherkassky, BPO,
	  Karajan)
	  Piano Concerto no.1 (Argerich, LSO, Abbado)
	  Mephisto Waltz no. 1 (Richter)
	  Piano Sonata (Argerich)
	  Feux follets; Harmonies du soir. (Richter)
	  Benediction de Dieu dans la solitude (Arrau)
	  Hungarian Rhapsody (Argerich)
	  
 DG Panorama 469 151 -2.
	  Two CDs series at a special price. (ADD) [75.52 and
	  75.23]
	  Crotchet 
	  
	  
	  
	  
	  
	  Karajan fails to understand Liszt as is quite evident from his recording
	  of four works on this disc. To add to the problems, track 3 on the first
	  CD is not the Hungarian Rhapsody no. 2 as stated. Track 4 is the Hungarian
	  Rhapsody no. 2. But I should not worry about this too much. They are both
	  ill-served by the conductor.
	  
	  The opening of Les Preludes has an inappropriate tempo and a lush
	  sound with an over-prominent harp: certainly not what Liszt required. The
	  music sounds like the watery music of Ravel or Debussy (not that there is
	  anything wrong with these two composers) but this is Liszt. The march section
	  is painfully slow and strident. The timpanist is in another building and
	  the performance is bland. Karajan drags the music so painfully at times it
	  is like pulling teeth and the result is that the music's excitement is lost.
	  
	  Part of this splendid score was used in George Stevens' film The Greatest
	  Story Ever Told when the music was ascribed to Alfred Newman. The performance
	  used on that soundtrack is better than this. Even in the more energetic sections
	  Karajan fails to get the timpani entries to increase in tone at each entry.
	  
	  The best recorded performance was on an old Supraphon disc with Martin Turnovsky
	  conducting.
	  
	  For the musical detective can you hear a theme in the Liszt that Strauss
	  was to copy in Till Eulenspiegel?
	  
	  Of course, there are composers that Karajan has had some success with but
	  even then he alters the composers' scores. For example he uses eight horns
	  in Beethoven's Choral Symphony ... not what Beethoven requested.
	  
	  Shura Cherkassky tries, but fails, to get Karajan on line in the Fantasia
	  and you will see how he understands the music! My teacher (Humphrey
	  Searle - Ed) was the world's expert on Liszt and he hated Karajan's
	  performances. Having heard them for the first time I can see why.
	  
	  Karajan's version of that Liszt evergreen, the Hungarian Rhapsody no. 2,
	  was crude and exaggerated and the Rhapsody no. 4 was no better. Listen to
	  the awful sounds of the horns at the beginning. Karajan shows no control
	  or understanding of the episodic nature of this work. He brings out sudden
	  surges of sound which are not in the score and makes the music sound banal.
	  I am reminded of that fine interpreter of Liszt, Louis Kentner, being asked
	  to record the Liszt concertos. "Certainly," he replied, "as long as Karajan
	  is not the conductor."
	  
	  We now move to a different conductor. Abbado accompanies Martha Argerich
	  in the splendid Piano Concerto no. 1. The difference is evident. Here is
	  music for music's sake. This is a very difficult work to play and bring off
	  but it teems with ideas. Listen to how Abbado shapes the music. It is perfection
	  itself. Has simplicity ever sounded so moving? The drama is also very well
	  judged. The triumphant conclusion is majestic, without pomp. Argerich is
	  magnificent. Yes, her speeds are always slightly too fast but what a performance!
	  It is not favourite performance. André Watts with the New York PO
	  under Bernstein is even better than this noteworthy account!
	  
	  The second disc is devoted to the piano and four pianists. Ashkenazy is
	  technically sound but I would have preferred a more diabolic sound for the
	  Mephisto Waltz. The Piano Sonata is, without doubt, the finest piano sonata
	  of all time. It is a monumental and thoroughly satisfying masterpiece. Argerich
	  is simply stunning, generating red hot excitement. Peter Katin's
	  performance on Athene is more mature
	  and he brings out the tender qualities better but if you just want the fireworks
	  and a breathtaking performance you will love Argerich. Richter's performances
	  left me cold. There was no subtlety or character in his performances. Arrau
	  is very fine in the massive Benediction although it is not the easiest of
	  pieces to take to. But what class playing! The indomitable Martha Argerich
	  ends the disc with the Hungarian Rhapsody no. 6.
	  
	  I don't know how to assess these discs. What is clear is that you must look
	  elsewhere for the orchestral music since Karajan's performances are sabotage!
	  
	  David Wright
	  
	  Performances
	  
	  Karajan... .appalling
	  
	  Argerich 
	  
	  Ashkenazy 
	  
	  Arrau 
	  
	  Richter 
	  
	  Recording  
 to