Some readers, especially those outside the UK, may be
sceptical as to whether these recordings by the BBC National Orchestra
of Wales can realistically be competitive, given that the worlds
most famous orchestras have already recorded this repertoire. It should
therefore be stated immediately that the combination of this excellent
ensemble, a conductor with many individual insights to offer and fine
engineering produces results here which will impress even seasoned disc
collectors. These formidable new recordings from BIS are not overshadowed
by competition from the worlds most glamorous orchestras: on the
contrary, in the Fifth Symphony, most of the competition is trounced.
With a timing of 1929", Wigglesworths performance
of the opening movement of the Fifth Symphony is even longer than that
of Maxim Shostakovich in his 1990 recording with the London Symphony
Orchestra. Rewarding though that earlier performance is, the conductor
relies on the slow tempo alone to convey a sense of gravity, whereas
Wigglesworth takes more care to shape the music, and at this speed there
is certainly plenty of time to characterise all the details: note the
dramatic emphasis in the bars leading to the violins first tremolo
at 132" (is the composer giving us a premonition here of the most
inward-looking moment of the symphony, the violins long-sustained
pp tremolo on the same high C in the third movement from 553"
to 726"?) There are some passages of such hushed playing (such
as at 912") that the effect is of numbness, the tone starved to
the bone; one is reminded of how many details in this movement foreshadow
precisely-analogous passages in the first movement of the Eighth Symphony.
Wigglesworths vision is so disturbing that when the menacing middle
section erupts at 958", initially it comes almost as a relief
to the listener after so much slow, quiet intensity. After the climax,
the return at 1736" of the dotted figuration from bar 5 of the
symphony is harrowing. The hallucinatory atmosphere is heightened at
1834" by an extraordinary glissando in the strings, indicated
by the composer, which conductors try usually to tone down. The symphony
is split over the two CDs and one has to change discs after the opening
movement, but this is not a problem: you are likely to be so moved by
this performance of the first movement that you will want a considerable
break before continuing with the second.
The rest of the performance is on the same high level:
the scherzo is positively facetious here and there are many instances
of great sensitivity in the Largo. This account of the finale
confronts us with total emptiness at 726"; Rostropovichs
1982 DG recording (by no means superseded by his 1994 Teldec remake)
turned upside down our established ideas as to how performances of the
symphony might continue from this point and Wigglesworths compelling
solution is to crawl out of the void, bursting into a faster tempo (crotchet
= 160) for the final 35 bars, brutally forceful at the end with no rit
at all.
The performance of the Sixth Symphony, although fine,
is less innovative than that of the Fifth. For me, the 1979 EMI version
by the Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra under Paavo Berglund (not available
at the time of writing) remains the most shattering account ever recorded
and it is unfortunate that the 1965 Melodiya live performance
by Mravinsky and the Leningrad Philharmonic which EMI issued on LP in
1972 is not available on CD (the Melodiya version of No.6 by the same
artists on BMG 74321 251982, also recorded live in 1965
with even worse coughing and inferior sound quality, is not the same
performance, and neither is the 1976 recording of the Tenth Symphony
with which it is coupled the same performance of No.10 as the version,
also from 1976, which was issued on Erato 2292-45753-2). Mravinsky is
surpassed by Wigglesworth in the bleak opening movement, where he creates
a chill with his pianissimi and subtle orchestral balances. I prefer
the other two movements to be more strongly differentiated in character
than is the case here: nobody seems yet to have observed that the withdrawn
conclusion of the middle movement, with its ascending chromatic scale
on woodwind over an A/D figuration on timpani, is a dark parody of the
end of the opening movement of the Fifth Symphony, where the A/D figuration
is also on timpani, but the scale is played by the celeste; such expressive
implications in the middle movement of the Sixth Symphony are very different
from the circus riot with which the finale concludes. Perhaps Wigglesworth
does not wish to contrast the two fast movements, preferring that the
finale should follow the middle movement without much increase in wildness,
so that the two movements match each other in uniform hollowness: this
is suggested by the hemiola he introduces at bar 240 in the finale (252"),
a clear allusion to bars 144/5 & 152/3 (137" & 143")
in the middle movement. The sarcasm of triumphant triviality which should
assault the listener at the end of the work has never been more blatantly
proclaimed than in Berglunds recording; the new BIS version does
not match it, but nevertheless it is a front-runner amongst the recordings
currently available.
Wigglesworths perceptive booklet notes relate
the opening movement of the Tenth Symphony to "the exhaustion of all
who lived through the twenty-five years of Stalins tyranny" and
his performance conveys well the atmosphere of grey clouds and hermit-like
introversion which hangs over this movement. In this conductors
hands, the music grows gradually from the dark underground world of
the works opening, as though depicting the first tentative signs
of calm spiritual rebirth after years of having to hide emotions under
irony; minor liberties with the text, such as ignoring the tempo change
indicated at bar 62 (229") and adding a pause to emphasise a soft
string entry at bar 717 (2257") are justifiable: in the context
of this deeply-felt vision of the movement, they are no more than intelligently-made
adjustments.
Because of the return to pensive underground hibernation
which this performance suggests at the end of the first movement, the
second makes an even stronger impact than usual, slightly marred by
out-of-tune violins at 212" (a semitone flat) and an absent side
drum at 225"; my only other quibble is that, as in Wigglesworths
recording of the Seventh Symphony, I find the occasional unmarked string
portamenti, both here and in other movements, of dubious value. In the
third movement, Wigglesworth takes on board recent discoveries about
the solo horn themes programmatic origin, discussed in his booklet
notes. One detects the resultant influence on his interpretation with
the extreme pianissimo at bar 168 (410"). Unmarked it may be,
but most other performances sound pedantic at this point when one has
grown accustomed to the BIS version. The performance of the finale breaks
no such new ground, but it is convincing nevertheless, and the views
of the conductor as expressed in his booklet notes, concerning the meaning
of this movement, may leave you pondering afresh how it relates to the
preceding three.
Despite displaying such individuality, these performances
never suggest any superficial, self-conscious straining after novel
effects: after repeated hearings, I have found that the readings grow
in stature, especially the stunning account of the Fifth Symphony, one
of the most original I have heard. There is no routine playing, every
phrase is carefully judged and there is evidence of long, hard thinking
by the conductor. We need more music-making like this these days.