Wolfgang Amadeus MOZART (1756-1791)
 The Last Six Symphonies
 Symphony No 36 in C, K425 ‘Linz’ (1783) [27:05]
 Symphony No 39 in E flat, K543 (1788) [26:41]
 Symphony No 38 in D, K504 ‘Prague’ (1786) [24:10]
 Symphony No 40 in G minor, K550 (1788) [25:33]
 Symphony No 41 in C, K551 ‘Jupiter’ (1788) [30:18]
 Symphony No 35 in D, K385 ‘Haffner’ (1782) [19:14]
 Columbia Symphony Orchestra/Bruno Walter
 rec. 1959-63. ADD/stereo
 Reviewed as streamed in 24/192 sound.
 SONY G0100040942846
    [153:00]
 Also available: Nos. 35 and 39 MK42026, a Presto special
    CDR.
	
    Having failed to deliver my promised review of the Sony    Bruno Walter – The Complete Columbia Collection (Sony 19075923242,
    77 CDs) in reasonable time, I’m picking out some of the plums from it. The
    complete set costs around £200, takes up oodles of space, and contains
    several recordings you probably already own. For starters, I’ve selected
    these stereo Mozart recordings from Walter’s Indian Summer and his much
    earlier (mono) recordings of Beethoven’s Seventh and Eighth symphonies.
 
    Those Beethoven recordings, with the New York Philharmonic, are preferable,
    except as recorded sound, to his later Beethoven with the Columbia Symphony
    Orchestra. He didn’t have the same rapport with this ad hoc
    recording group as he did with the NYPO, but they did make some fine
    recordings together, and these Mozart symphonies are among the best.
 
    The complete set contains some earlier Walter Mozart recordings with the
    NYPO, including Nos 38 and 41 from 1949 (CD6 of the set or G010004058259E,
    download or stream), but it’s to these later recordings that I’m still
    attached. Long ago, returning to Oxford in a miserable late January, I
    splashed out on the CBS release of these recordings of the ‘Haffner’ and
    ‘Jupiter’ symphonies at full price, an unheard-of extravagance, but the
    bright cover of a miniature violin on a score, highlighted by a prism, was
    so appealing. Though a confirmed Beecham fan by then, I plumped for that
    Walter LP at 36/- (over £60 today) and never regretted it. In fact, I
    compared the ‘Jupiter’ with a friend’s copy of the Beecham and preferred
    Walter. Later, I replaced it with the stereo version and, later still, with
    the 2-CD CBS Maestro reissue of the six late symphonies. That’s still my
    version of choice; not only do I know where to find the CDs easily, I’ve
    ripped them for even faster computer listening.
 
    The latest reissue returns to the original LP couplings, whereas the CBS
    Maestro reissue, with three symphonies per CD, managed to get all six on
    two well-filled discs. That’s well worth seeking out if you can find a
    decent second-hand copy, but I could wish that they had retained the LP
    sleeves – that for Nos 35 and 41 especially. At least the new cover shot
    is more imaginative than the drab CBS Maestro.
 
    I chose the Linn reissue of Sir Charles Mackerras’ recordings of the late
    Mozart symphonies and Requiem as one of my Recordings of the Year
    for 2020, but that in no way negates my strong affection for these Walter
    recordings; in fact, I couldn’t avoid eulogising them in my
    
        review
    
    of that set. I remarked that Mackerras makes the ‘Prague’ symphony sound
    almost the equal of the three masterpieces which followed it; I could say
    the same of Walter.
 
    Of course, Mackerras, with the benefit of extra knowledge of period
    practice and the slimmer dimensions of the Scottish Chamber Orchestra,
    sounds very different from Walter, but what unites them is a clear
    affection for the music. I’d hate to choose between them for my Desert
    Island.
 
    In a sense comparison is futile, partly because Walter was all over the
    place when it came to including or omitting repeats. Where comparison is
    possible, however, I’m surprised how little difference there is in the 
	spirit of the performances. From the
    opening movement of No 35, allegro con spirito, it’s apparent that
    a larger orchestra is involved under Walter, and the 1959 recording, though
    still good for its date, can’t compare with the Linn, but what Mackerras
    gives us is more like a revised version of Walter’s Mozart – a lither,
    livelier version, with even better playing than Walter obtained from the
    Columbia Orchestra, and better recorded. That means that we hear more of
    the inner detail, but it’s not a radical rethink of the movement.
    
    
    Walter gives us the andante second movement in 5:17, where
    Mackerras takes 8:03. The Columbia playing is often surprisingly delicate
    for such a large orchestra, but figures are deceptive: it’s not that
    Mackerras dawdles through the movement, though he certainly doesn’t rush
    it, merely that the Linn recording gives the movement its full weight by
    observing the repeats. And, while Mackerras is certainly alive to the
    emotional heart of the music, he does so without the need to pull the tempo
    around as much as Walter.
 
    If there’s one work in which large-scale Mozart works best, it’s the
    ‘Jupiter’ symphony. I dislike the term ‘big band’, because that has its own
    connotations for a style of music that I enjoy. By the time that the
    ‘Jupiter’ was composed in 1788, Haydn had taken the concept of the symphony
    to new heights with his six ‘Paris’ symphonies (Nos 82-87) and No 88, but
    Mozart’s final three would lift the form even further.
 
    The ‘Jupiter’ is amazingly capable of sounding right in a variety of
    interpretations. I was surprised to discover from the Hyperion ‘Jupiter
    Project’ how well it sounds in Clementi’s chamber-scale reduction for
    piano, flute, violin and cello (CDA68234 –
    
        review
    
    –
    
        review). At the other end of the scale, Walter provides the grandeur that the
    title proclaims, to which the chamber reduction can never aspire. Böhm, of
    similar vintage, is a little lighter on his feet throughout, but that’s
    less appropriate in this symphony than in earlier Mozart. (4474162, 2 CDs,
    budget price – see
    
        review
    
    of Alto reissue of Nos 39-41).
 
    The Berlin Philharmonic also play very well for Böhm, though without the
    sense of being well-drilled that Karajan would bring to his Mozart
    recordings with the same orchestra. But Walter and the Columbia Symphony
    had by this time settled in better together, and they were playing for him
    almost as well as the NYPO had. The recording is a little brighter than the
    DG – markedly so if you play one after the other, with Böhm sounding a
    little dull at first until the ear adjusts. If Walter captures more of the
    grandeur, Böhm is more lyrical. Either would serve as a fine example of the
    best of the older style of Mozart playing. (I’m referring to the c.1960
    Böhm, not his later Mozart recordings.)
 
    The Mackerras recordings offer a clear modern choice, especially at their
    new price of around £24, a 5-CD set with the Requiem thrown in.
    They are also available on CD, whereas the Sony is download only, unless
    you go for the big box or can find the earlier CBS Maestro CDs. But I can’t
    find it in my heart to decry Walter’s Mozart; like the DG recordings of the
    same symphonies from Karl Böhm, there’s a clear place for them alongside
    later versions. Listen, for example, to the love which Walter bestows on
    the second movement of the Linz, on the second track into the set,
    and I defy you not to share his affection for the music. A few tracks
    later, the opening movement of No 39 dances in a way that very few
    recordings achieve.
 
    The late-50s, early-60s sound has come up very well indeed in the 24/192
    transfer that I listened to. It does seem to add a little extra presence
    over and above the CD set that I own, but it comes at a price. In reviewing
    the Beethoven Symphonies Nos 7 and 8, I mentioned that these individual
    downloads from the Sony set are comparatively expensive, but these Mozart
    recordings offer better value than most, with the contents of three CDs
    from the set offered in lossless sound for around £11.50, the same price as
    the single-CD-equivalents in the series.
 
    By all means you should have more recent, historically informed recordings
    of these symphonies, such as the Mackerras. There’s also an attractive set
    of the Brilliant Classics complete Mozart symphonies from Jaap ter Linden –
    see my Recording of the Month
    
        review
    
    for a comparison with Walter in the ‘Jupiter’ – but you should also have
    Walter’s Mozart in your library. Beware: what was a super-budget Brilliant
    CD set is now an over-expensive download-only proposition from some
    dealers, though Amazon UK still have the CDs for £35.95 and Qobuz have the
    download for £16.19. Snap either up while you can at those prices, but do
    go for the Walter, too, as offering the best of old-style Mozart in very
    good transfers.
 
    Brian Wilson