Igor STRAVINSKY (1882-1971)
 Pétrouchka
    (original version, 1911) [35:26]
 Jeu de cartes
    (Game of cards), (1937) [22:17]
 The Orchestra of the Mariinsky Theatre/Valery Gergiev
 rec. 2009 (Jeu de cartes) & 2014 (Pétrouchka), Concert Hall of
    the Mariinsky Theatre, St Petersburg
 Reviewed as a stereo DSD64 download from
    
        NativeDSD. Recorded in DSD
 Pdf booklet included
 MARIINSKY MAR0594 SACD
    [57:51]
	More out of frustration than facetiousness I’ve dubbed Gergiev ‘Valery the
    Variable’. His Kirov opera boxes, recorded for Philips in the 1990s, were
    generally well regarded, and his LSO set of the Prokofiev symphonies from
    the noughties – Philips again – is very good indeed. Staying with Russian
    rep, he and LSO Live have since given us undercooked Rachmaninov – a ‘top
    notch’
    Symphony No. 2
    excepted – and some overheated Scriabin. Gergiev’s Mariinsky Shostakovich
    is just as erratic, a hard-hitting
    
        
            Leningrad
        
    
    and a riotous account of
    
        
            The Nose
        
    
    notwithstanding.
 
    Oddly, for a conductor who specialises in the music of his homeland,
    Gergiev has recorded comparatively little Stravinsky. In 1999, he and the
Rotterdam PO provided the backing for Peter Rump’s film,    The story of Stravinsky's 
	Le sacre du printemps, a collaboration Ian Lace described as ‘utterly 
	absorbing’ (Arthaus Musik). As for L’Oiseau de feu, there’s a Kirov 
	video from 2003 (Euroarts). The latter was also well received, this time by Paul Corfield Godfrey,
    all of which augurs well for the album under review.
 
    My comparatives in Pétrouchka, given here in its original 
	version, are those of period-instrument specialists François-Xavier Roth and 
	Les Siècles (Actes Musicales)
	and the London Phil under Vladimir Jurowski (LPO LPO0091). For    Jeu de cartes, 
	I’ve chosen Robert Craft’s Philharmonia recording (Naxos)
    and, my wild card, a new account from Gustavo Gimeno and the Orchestre
    Philharmonique du Luxembourg (Pentatone PTC5186 650).
 
    Let’s start with the less familiar Jeu de cartes, a ballet in three
    ‘deals’. Commissioned and choreographed by George Balanchine, it was
    premiered in New York in April 1937. It’s a game of poker, in which the evil
    Joker is conquered by what Stravinsky called ‘the group of hearts’. (The
    political subtext is unmistakable.) Cue a medley of dances that show the
    composer at his transparent, economical and clear-eyed best. That said, the
    music has a warmth, an approachability, that one doesn’t associate with the
    composer’s neo-classical period (1920 to 1954). Indeed, in the right hands
    the piece has a sharp wit and rhythmic verve that’s hard to resist.
 
    Musically, Gergiev reveals a very strong hand – fine pacing and deft
    characterisation – but thanks to engineers Jonathan Stokes and Neil
    Hutchinson he comes up trumps in terms of sound. Goodness, what a wealth of
    detail, array of colours and pleasing perspectives. And while its good,
    Craft’s 1998 recording just isn’t in the same league. However, as a reading
    it’s very persuasive, and, like Gergiev, he maintains a good, strong
    narrative throughout. Two fine orchestras, no question, but these virtuosic
    Russians have the edge here.
 
    Craft, Stravinsky’s long-serving amanuensis, is always worth hearing in his
    master’s music. That’s certainly true of his Jeu de cartes,
    part of a generous collection titled The Later Ballets; it really
    ought to be on your shelves or hard drive. As for Gimeno, whose recent
    
        Shostakovich
    
    was frankly underwhelming, his sluggish tempi and strangely anodyne
    performance here puts him out of the game at an early stage. Even the
    sound is rather disappointing. Of course, the rest of his two-disc
    Stravinsky set – I’ve yet to hear it all – may be more successful.
 
    I suspect most listeners know Pétrouchka via the revised 1947 score,
    which omits a number of instruments (there’s no off-stage band and no
    glockenspiel, for example). Originally written for Diaghilev’s Ballets
    Russes in 1911, it’s a darkly brilliant tale of three puppets brought to
    life at the 1830 Shrovetide Fair in St Petersburg. I generally seek out the
    later version, although, if anything, the lustrous Rimskian original seems
    even more deeply rooted in the folkloric loam of Mother Russia. And that’s
    why a chance to revisit Stravinky’s initial conception ls especially
    welcome.
 
As expected after his vivid and vital Jeu de cartes, Gergiev’s    Pétrouchka is instantly immersive, those irresistible rhythms
    delivered with enormous energy and appropriate edge. The extra harp adds
    real magic to the proceedings, and the Mariinsky winds in ‘The Conjuring
    Trick’ are beautifully caught. The recording, engineered by the veteran
    Vladimir Ryabenko, is big and bold, with magnificent bass and rollicking
    snare drums. Happily, the sonics aren’t overblown, although the recording
    puts the listener firmly in the front stalls.
 
    It’s been ages since I’ve heard this much of Stravinsky’s extraordinary
    writing, its stark contrasts, runaway rhythms and its sheer, inexorable
    sense of drama; for that Gergiev and Ryabenko must take equal
    credit. There are so many felicities here, from that eerie barrel-organ
    effect in ‘The Crowds’ to the nimble trumpet in the ballerina’s waltz.
    Also, Gergiev makes the most of that unsettling change of mood as the Moor
    joins in the dance. In fact, I’ve never been so completely mesmerised by
    the music’s deep, dark spell. And that would be high praise for any
    conductor, let alone this one.
 
    Is this the same baton waver I’ve lambasted in the past, as we sweep
    emphatically through ‘Shrovetide Fair (towards evening)’ and the glittering
    ‘Dance of the Wet-Nurses’? And what passion Gergiev brings to the gypsy
    girls’ dance and that of the coachmen and grooms, the orchestra playing
    with glorious abandon throughout. In striking contrast, the hero’s death
    has real pathos here, something that few rivals manage to convey at the
    potentially anticlimactic close.
 
    If Gergiev’s Pétrouchka is unremittingly Russian, Roth’s, with its
    emphasis on metropolitan suavity, is quintessentially French. Also, the
    period instruments add a certain piquancy to the overall sound that’s most
    appealing. And even though the recording itself is less overt, it reveals
    plenty of nuance and colour. Indeed, it’s a beautiful performance
    that’s very beguiling, too. That would be reason enough to own this album
    album, if it weren’t already a ‘must have’ for the coupling, a revelatory
    account of Le sacre du printemps.
 
    Jurowski’s Pétrouchka, recorded live at London’s Royal Festival 
	Hall
    in May 2015, is certainly more propulsive than Roth’s. Not only that, there
    are times when he ekes out some startling phrases and timbres. However, in
    this company Jurowski’s bright, forensically recorded performance – coupled
with equally forthright accounts of Stravinsky’s    Symphonies of Wind Instruments and Orpheus – now seems too
    focused on detail at the expense of weight or a compelling narrative. That
    very linear, symphonically streamlined approach is one of the reasons I so
    disliked Jurowski’s recent Swan Lake (Pentatone).
 
    Of course, these are just two comparatives each from a full catalogue, but
I hope they point up the considerable virtues of Gergiev’s    Pétrouchka and Jeu de cartes. Indeed, the latter's
    performances are now prime choices for both works, not least because
    they’re so theatrical; for me, that always helps to distinguish good ballet
    recordings from exceptional ones. Comprehensive multilingual liner-notes
    add to the feel of a quality package.
 
    Riveting performances, very well played and recorded; Gergiev at his very
    best.
 
    Dan Morgan
 
Previous review:
	
	Dave Billinge