Sebastián de ALBERO (1722-1756)
  Recercata, fuga y sonata No. 1 in D [13:25]
  Recercata, fuga y sonata No. 2 in A [19:15]
  Recercata, fuga y sonata No. 3 in B flat [16:37]
  Recercata, fuga y sonata No. 4 in G [15:49]
  Recercata, fuga y sonata No. 5 in C [20:29]
  Recercata, fuga y sonata No. 6 in E [23:20]
  Alejandro Casal (harpsichord)
  rec. 2014, Sputnik Studio, Sevilla
  BRILLIANT CLASSICS 95187 [2 CDs: 108:55]
	     Spanish keyboard music of the 18th century is almost exclusively 
          identified with two figures: Domenico Scarlatti and Antonio Soler. Other 
          composers who were active in this field are largely overlooked. Not 
          that Sebastián de Albero is a completely unknown quantity. His keyboard 
          works have been preserved in two manuscripts. One of them, Sonatas 
          para clavicordio, has been recorded several times, either complete 
          or partly. In contrast, the second collection, Obras, para clavicordio, 
          o piano forte, has hardly been given any attention. As far as I 
          know, only Andreas Staier recorded two of the six pieces with the unusual 
          title of Recercata, fuga y sonata. The present disc includes 
          all six of them.
          
          Sebastián Ramón de Albero Añanos was born in Roncal in Navarra and was 
          educated as a keyboard player. As a boy he sang in the choir of Pamplona 
          Cathedral and in 1748 he was appointed first organist of the Royal Chapel. 
          At that time Domenico Scarlatti also lived and worked in Madrid. Albero 
          stayed here until his death.
          
          The set of six pieces recorded here is quite unique. First of all, the 
          recercata is an old term which was common in the Renaissance, but was 
          completely out of fashion in the 18th century. In the 16th century this 
          word was used by Diego Ortiz for series of diminutions. Albero's 
          recercatas have nothing to do with them. His recercatas are inspired 
          by the French préludes non mesurés of the 17th century. They 
          include some modulations and they come without any bar-lines, which 
          requires some improvisatory skills from the performer. Notable is that 
          at the first bar we find the indication ad libitum. Alejandro 
          Casal, in his liner-notes, doesn't give an explanation. Maybe 
          this indicates that these recercatas can be omitted when the player 
          doesn't have the capabilities to realise them.
          
          The main part of these pieces are the fugues. These are mostly very 
          long: the longest on this disc is 12:42. They are strictly in two parts; 
          the themes are quite long, sometimes eight or nine bars. To be honest, 
          I don't find them that interesting. These fugues also include 
          long sequences of the same kind of figures, which is immediately discernible, 
          if one looks at the scores. The last section is called sonata. 
          It is in binary form; both sections have to be repeated. These are considerably 
          shorter, and sometimes the number of voices is extended to three. The 
          last sonata includes some very strong dissonants.
          
          I found it rather tiresome to listen to these pieces. After a while 
          I came to the conclusion that the music was not very good. I took into 
          consideration that maybe I needed to listen a second time and then the 
          music would reveal its qualities. However, I found a disc in my collection 
          with two of these pieces, recorded by Andreas Staier. Listening to him 
          I could hardly believe these were the same. His imaginative performance 
          of the recercatas is in strong contrast to the rigid interpretation 
          of Alejandro Casal, who does little more than playing the notes. Staier 
          takes the fugues at the much higher speed: for the Fugue in G 
          he needs just 5:52, whereas Casal takes 7:23. However, it is not only 
          the tempo which is different. Staier creates a more differentiated picture 
          through agogic means and variation in articulation, Casal's tempi 
          are rather uniform, and so is his articulation. That makes the frequent 
          repeats of the same figures hard to swallow. The same goes for the sonatas, 
          although here the differences in tempo are less significant. Here Casal 
          rightly respects the repeats, which Staier ignores.
          
          On the basis of this experience I had to change my mind about these 
          pieces. They seem to be well worth being performed and recorded, but 
          unfortunately the interpretation of Alejandro Casal is hardly a good 
          argument for them. He plays a fine instrument, a copy of an Iberian 
          harpsichord, built in Lisbon by Joachim José Antunes, which is part 
          of the Finchcocks Collection in Goudhurst (Kent, U.K.). In fact, it 
          is a more appropriate instrument for this repertoire than the German 
          harpsichord Staier plays. But its effect is nullified by the rather 
          rigid and unimaginative playing of Casal.
          
          Johan van Veen