The Swiss pianist Eva-Maria Zimmermann and her Japanese-born
colleague, Keisuke Nakagoshi teamed up in 2009 to play as a one-piano-four-hands
partnership under the name ZOFO in addition to pursuing their respective individual
careers. ZOFO is shorthand for 20-finger orchestra. Here they offer an intriguing
programme which might be described as interplanetary in concept.
The principal work is Holst’s
The Planets. This great orchestral
score also exists in a version by the composer for two pianos (
review)
and also, apparently, in a one-piano-four-hands version (
review;
review).
The former is given an occasional airing but, as the notes say, these versions
were made while
The Planets was still a work in progress. It appears
that a one-piano-four-hands arrangement was also made by two friends of Holst,
Nora Day and Vally Lasker, which was signed by the composer; the notes imply
that his signature conveyed some legitimacy on that version. What is recorded
here is an arrangement by Eva-Maria Zimmermann and Keisuke Nakagoshi which
they have made from a combination of the orchestral score, Holst’s two-piano
version and the Day/Lasker arrangement.
Despite the undoubted skill of ZOFO in playing it I fear that this traversal
of
The Planets struck me as being pretty thin gruel. Some things
work quite well – up to a point. The music of ‘Mars’ has
a pronounced percussive quality anyway so that can be communicated reasonably
well on a piano. However, the colour and variety of timbre that one finds
in the orchestral score is entirely absent and one quickly realises how vital
an ingredient is Holst’s inventive orchestration. Furthermore, in this
reduced version the mighty climaxes sound puny.
‘Venus’ is delicately played but again one craves to hear the
notes in the composer’s subtle pastel orchestration. Simply as a piano
scherzo ‘Mercury’ comes off quite well and I hope I’ll be
pardoned for a pun in saying that ZOFO’s playing is suitably mercurial.
However, by the time I got to ‘Jupiter’ I’m afraid that,
for all the artistry of the two pianists my ears had become rather weary of
the sound of a single piano. Not only is the lack of colour increasingly apparent
as the performance of the suite goes on but, to make matters worse, the Big
Tune in ‘Jupiter’ is rather diminished in this performance. I
could go on but I think you have the picture by now. The resources even of
two expert pianists are over-extended by this music and when ‘Neptune’
starts to fade into the distance there is, of course, no female chorus to
add yet another strand of colour. I’m afraid I shouldn’t want
to hear this performance again: it’s far too limited and limiting.
The rest of the programme consists of more recent music, all of which was
specifically composed for the one-piano-four-hands medium. Two pieces are
offered from George Crumb’s fourth
Mikrokosmos book. These
are ‘Alpha Centauri’ and ‘Beta Cygni’. To be honest,
I don’t feel qualified to comment on this music or the performance it
receives. Some of the sounds that Crumb conjures up are intriguing, especially
in ‘Beta Cygni’. However, this is music which I don’t profess
to understand, nor does it appeal to me.
Urmas
Sisask is an Estonian composer who has a longstanding fascination with
astronomy. We learn from the useful notes that so great is his interest that
he has written a number of pieces using a musical system of his own creation,
which he calls “astro-music”. This system involves a mode, which
he calls the “planetal scale”, consisting of five notes: C-sharp,
D, F-sharp, G-sharp and A.
The Milky Way is an example of astro-music.
It’s cast in two short, untitled movements. It’s not unpleasant
listening but the musical material seemed very limited to me and the music,
much of which is played at very soft dynamic levels, doesn’t make a
very strong impression.
Gravity is by the American composer, David Long. He writes in the
booklet that he wanted to compose “a kind of music that would always
be falling….and yet never really resting or landing.” The music
is slow and consonant. To my ears the material is somewhat repetitive but
I have to say that it’s strangely hypnotic. It’s played with no
little finesse.
I think this is a pretty niche disc and one with limited appeal to collectors.
For all that the arrangement of the Holst does, to some extent, reveal the
music’s inner workings I believe that the loss of colour is a significant
drawback. I’m not sure how often one would want to hear Holst’s
great score played like this yet this is presumably the principal attraction
of the programme.
The package offer both a CD and a BD-A. The recording is clear and crisp.
However, when this recording was auditioned in its BD-A format in the
MusicWeb
Listening Studio a little while ago we felt that the recording
was
decent but unremarkable. The listening that I’ve done since then on
my own equipment has not changed that view.
John
Quinn