The world of early 18th century opera was very different 
    to that of, say, Mozart. The story was the thing. Librettos were offered to 
    musicians as a means of getting the poetic drama before the public. Thus the 
    great librettists were set multiple times. So it was with Vienna's imperial 
    poet Metastasio's 
Catone in Utica. This story, set in the ancient Numidian 
    city of Utica - now a ruin in Tunisia - involves the Roman Cato the Younger 
    and his conflict with Julius Caesar. The plot itself is the usual mixture 
    of love and betrayal, but because it was by Metastasio there were at least 
    two settings, by Vinci and Hasse, even before Vivaldi composed the present 
    piece. 
    
    Unfortunately the first act of his setting has gone missing and thus whilst 
    we know the libretto, we don't know anything about the music. In an attempt 
    to present as complete a work as possible for Naïve's Vivaldi Edition, 
    of which this is an amazing Volume 55, it was decided to record a reconstruction 
    of Act 1, followed by Vivaldi's own music for Acts 2 and 3. The reconstruction 
    by Alessandro Ciccolini is as scholarly as one could wish and the details 
    are exhaustively described and charted in the accompanying booklet. What we 
    hear is derived from 'real' Vivaldi but extrapolated into a full set of arias 
    and recitatives. Just one aria in Act 1 is fully Vivaldi in that he composed 
    it all, it is believed, for this opera. For the listener, the result of all 
    this effort is 69 minutes of 'almost Vivaldi' followed by 92 minutes of actual 
    Vivaldi. The only thing not explained in the documentation is why this decision 
    was made. We are not told why they did not simply record Acts 2 and 3 which 
    exist as an autograph score by the 'Red Priest' himself. I found this fact 
    oddly disturbing because, so convincing is Ciccolini's reconstruction, one 
    is left marvelling that it is possible to produce such realistic ersatz Vivaldi. 
    Can one imagine doing this with Beethoven or Brahms? However, to give this 
    some context, this is not the first time this particular opera has been reconstructed 
    and recorded. A previous effort by Jean-Claude Malgoire and La Grande Ecurie 
    et la Chambre du Roy is available on Dynamic. 
      
    There can be no doubt that this opera is a delight from start to finish. Vivaldi 
    is his usual inventive self - at least those bits he actually wrote - with 
    an ear for the felicitous phrase and the finest of lyrical invention. He is 
    judicious in his use of the orchestra; mostly just strings and wind but near 
    the end with the addition of triumphal brass. Only once do we have a chorus, 
    the soloists together, and it lasts less than a minute. The six soloists are 
    very fine, though I did question the vocal control of Roberta Mameli as Cesare 
    in just one Act 1 aria 
Vaga sei nè sdegni tuoi. The orchestra 
    under their experienced American director Alan Curtis, are quite wonderful. 
    Curtis has a musical CV of the first order as scholar, player and conductor. 
    His baroque and early classical discography is very impressive. The present 
    recording is little short of spectacular in its realism. The orchestra spreads 
    convincingly and the soloists were standing just behind my speakers, especially 
    the centre speaker which was actually off. That is how good a sound-picture 
    engineer Jean-Daniel Noir has achieved.  
    
    
Dave Billinge 
      
    A magnificent recording of yet another splendid Vivaldi opera, the 18th in 
    Naïve's great series.  
    
    See also review by 
Brina Wilson and Geoffrey 
    Molyneux