Daniel Gottlob Türk belongs to the generation of German 
      keyboard composers who were active in the shadow of Haydn and Mozart. As 
      a result their oeuvre has largely remained under the radar. Even keyboard 
      players who specialize in the music of the second half of the 18th century 
      have had little engagement with this music. Only recently I reviewed a disc 
      devoted to another composer of that generation, Johann Wilhelm Hässler (
review). 
      There is a connection between the two, as Hässler was Türk's teacher 
      for a number of years.
       
      Türk was born in Claussnitz, near Chemnitz; he received his first music 
      lessons from his father who was an instrumentalist at the service of Count 
      Schönburg. His first formal teacher was Gottfried August Homilius at the 
      Kreuzschule in Dresden. He then came under the guidance of Johann Adam Hiller, 
      another pupil of Homilius, who played an important role in musical life 
      in Leipzig, where Türk started his studies at the university in 1772. It 
      was under the influence of Hiller that he began to compose vocal works. 
      At the same time he took keyboard lessons from Hässler. It was through him 
      that he became acquainted with the style of Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach and 
      his treatise 
Versuch über die wahre Art das Clavier zu spielen.
       
      In 1774 Türk was appointed 
Kantor at the Ulrichskirche in Halle; 
      he remained there for the rest of his life. It wasn’t long before he became 
      the leading force in Halle’s music scene, as a teacher at the Lutheran Gymnasium, 
      as director of music at Halle University, and in 1787 as musical director 
      of the Marktkirche, the main church of the town. He gave up teaching at 
      the Gymnasium and completely concentrated on his musical activities, increasingly 
      focusing on music for keyboard. He also wrote several treatises, for instance 
      on the playing of the basso continuo. This was probably the last treatise 
      on this subject before the 20th century. Moreover, he performed several 
      of Handel's oratorios, and with that he laid the foundation of a 
      Handel tradition which is still very much alive in Halle.
       
      His music for keyboard reflects his interests in teaching and his pedagogical 
      skills. The two sets of sonatas which are the subject of this set were written 
      for amateurs, and that explains the title of 
Leichte Klaviersonaten 
      - easy keyboard sonatas. Several other collections serve the same target 
      group, such as a collection of little pieces with additional fingerings. 
      His keyboard compositions were much appreciated and the sonatas on this 
      disc saw several reprints. As a theorist Türk was also held in high esteem. 
      It is an indication of the man's character that Erwin R. Jacobi writes 
      in the article on Türk in 
New Grove, that one of his books was 
      written with "the most scrupulous scientific exactitude". His 
      writings were based on thorough studies for which he made use of his huge 
      library.
       
      In his liner-notes Michael Tsalka states that the title of the sonatas shouldn't 
      give the impression that this music is simple. That is important as it only 
      emphasizes what we know from other sources: the term 'amateur' 
      - in Germany often called 'Liebhaber' - is not comparable 
      with what we now usually call an 'amateur'. Many amateurs 
      had considerable skills and required music which was challenging enough 
      to keep them busy. That is exactly what Türk does in these sonatas. Their 
      content is also interesting enough, as they contain many strong contrasts 
      of 
Affekt, and in this respect reflect the style which we know 
      from a composer such as Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach. The titles of various 
      movements indicate the expressive content, for instance 'con tenerezza' 
      (with tenderness), 'con espressione' or 'innocentemente'.
       
      Two issues in regard to this production need to be raised. The first concerns 
      the choice of instrument. In his article in 
New Grove Erwin Jacobi 
      states that Türk took keyboard lessons from Hässler, and specifically mentions 
      the clavichord. That seems to have been Hässler's preferred instrument, 
      and one tends to think that Türk also had the clavichord in mind when writing 
      these 'easy sonatas'. The fact that these works include indications 
      in regard to dynamics also points in this direction. Tsalka doesn't 
      use a clavichord here, but rather a harpsichord and three different fortepianos. 
      The harpsichord is an instrument by Shudi and Broadwood (London, 1781) which 
      has two pedals for the Machine Stop and the Venetian Swell respectively. 
      The choice of an English instrument for German music - which may never have 
      been performed in England - is surprising. The choice of a Stein fortepiano 
      of 1784 is more plausible. The second fortepiano dates from 1785 and was 
      built in Florence by Vincenzo Sodi. It is surprising how different this 
      instrument's sound is from Stein's. It reminded me of the 
      sound of the 
tangent piano. With the fourth instrument comes the 
      oddest choice: a fortepiano by André Stein from 1820. It is an upright piano 
      with four pedals. One could justify this choice by the fact that Türk's 
      music has remained popular for quite some time. It is certainly possible 
      that it was still played after his death. Even so, from a musical point 
      of view I find its selection unfortunate as the 
fortes are rather 
      exaggerated. In the case of the two older fortepianos thpse 
fortes 
      come off more naturally and that would have been even more so at the clavichord.
       
      Part of the attraction of this disc derives from the fact that Tsalka plays 
      original instruments which are part of the Marlowe A. Sigal Collection in 
      Newton Centre (Mass, USA).
       
      The second issue is the style of playing. In many movements Tsalka takes 
      much freedom in regard to tempo and rhythm. That seems well in line with 
      views expressed by Türk. Tsalka mentions Türk's "suspicious 
      attitude towards the mechanical innovations of the metronome, which he feared 
      ruined the beat's intrinsic inner flexibility and, therefore, its 
      expressive core". That said, I think Tsalka goes a little too far now 
      and then. In some movements the rhythm is hardly recognizable. This is also 
      due to a sometimes extreme desynchronization of the two hands. I would prefer 
      a bit more moderation in this regard.
       
      That doesn't prevent me from expressing my gratitude for Michael 
      Tsalka's undertaking of Türk's keyboard music. In most parts 
      of this set his playing is fine and enjoyable. In my collection I have only 
      one piece from Türk's pen, played by Paul Simmonds on the clavichord. 
      I doubt whether much more is available on disc which makes this production 
      all the more valuable. Those readers who are interested in keyboard music 
      of the 18th century definitely shouldn't miss this one. They may 
      also look for the previous set of two discs, entitled "Keyboard Sonatas, 
      Collections I and II" (GP627-28).
      
      
Johan van Veen
      http://www.musica-dei-donum.org
      https://twitter.com/johanvanveen
       
      We owe much gratitude to Michael Tsalka for recording Türk's keyboard 
      music.