This is a reissue, on Warner’s budget-priced Apex label, of a 1998 reading 
      by Kurt Masur of Shostakovich’s Seventh Symphony. It was recorded in concert 
      during his time as Music Director of the New York Philharmonic. In his book 
      on the recent history of the orchestra, The New York Philharmonic from 
      Bernstein to Maazel (2010), the author and conductor, John Canarina, 
      quotes the New York Times critic, Allan Kozinn’s verdict on the 
      performance. “Mr. Masur made it sound less like patriotic poster art and 
      more like the wrenching human drama that Shostakovich intended.” I think 
      I know what Mr Kozinn was getting at and to some extent I agree with him. 
      This is a sober and well considered account of what has been one of the 
      composer’s more controversial scores. However, I’m not sure that Masur offers 
      us a “wrenching human drama”; for that you need to turn to a conductor such 
      as Leonard Bernstein (review).
       
      Masur is sturdy and resolute at the start of the immense first movement 
      – perhaps even with a touch of defiance – and his tempo seems to me to be 
      well judged. He handles the subsequent long G major violin theme and the 
      lyrical episode that flows from it very well. The most controversial aspect 
      of this score is what would normally be the development section. However, 
      at this point in the symphony Shostakovich places an extended passage consisting 
      of a dozen repetitions of the same banal theme in a Bolero-like 
      crescendo, which suggests an army approaching from the distance. This, he 
      later said, was the “Invasion Theme”. Masur plays the passage ‘straight’ 
      without any histrionic gestures and in due course achieves a mighty climax. 
      He then does the extended lyrical but melancholic section between the climax 
      and the end of the movement very well and the NYPO’s principal bassoonist 
      excels in his extended solo.
       
      Masur treats the second movement as a welcome contrast after the emotional 
      rigours of the first movement. The opening string material is delicately 
      played and the oboe solo that grows out of this material is wistful. The 
      central episode in 3/8 time (4:50-7:00) is sardonic and biting, with pungent 
      contributions from the woodwind, not least the strident, wailing E-flat 
      clarinet at the start. The New York players are suitably brash in this episode, 
      which is followed by a return to the opening material and mood. I find Masur’s 
      way with this movement very convincing.
       
      His way with the slow movement is measured and patient and here the NYPO 
      strings offer some fine playing. The moderato risoluto section 
      (from 7:47) is biting - the brass are potent – and the climax, with the 
      brass declaiming the opening chorale, is intense. The long melody for the 
      violas (13:11-14:23) is eloquently played and Masur and his team make a 
      fine job of the last few minutes of the movement. If you turn to Bernstein 
      you’ll find a draining, intense reading of this movement beside which Masur 
      seems rather sober. However, the Bernstein approach, while it resonates 
      with me, won’t be to everyone’s taste and Masur’s plainer, yet still powerful 
      take on the music has much to commend it.
       
      He holds the finale together convincingly. It’s not without its strident, 
      even banal passages but, equally, there’s much in Shostakovich’s music that’s 
      impressive and Masur, a vastly experienced hand, navigates his way shrewdly 
      through the score. The build-up to the final peroration begins a long way 
      out – as far back as 11:26 you might say – and Masur excels at maintaining 
      both tension and momentum. He paces the music carefully, not allowing it 
      to become too slow and grandiloquent, though he does broaden the tempo at 
      15:31 and maintains an expansive pace, which is not inappropriate, until 
      the end.
       
      In summary, Masur gives a straightforward, very reliable performance of 
      this symphony and if that sounds like faint praise it’s not intended that 
      way. There are no unwarranted histrionics in his performance and this vastly 
      experienced conductor is a good guide to this score. I liked his performance 
      and it helps that the NYPO plays ardently for him. Since this is a budget 
      priced release I’d say that Masur’s is an ideal way for a newcomer to the 
      score to try it out. The only snag is that, reprehensibly, Warner Classics 
      provide no notes whatsoever, rendering the release useless to the impulse 
      purchaser who thinks ‘I’ll try that’.
       
      However, I ought say that it is possible to dig deeper into this score than 
      Masur does. I’ve already mentioned the Bernstein recording, which is also 
      taken from concert performances (review). 
      That’s very much a one-off performance of amazing intensity and some may 
      feel it’s too red-blooded. My colleague, Dan Morgan, was very enthusiastic 
      about Valery Gergiev’s recording (review), 
      though I’ve not heard that and there are several other recordings listed 
      in our Masterworks 
      Index for this symphony. Nonetheless, Masur’s is a decent budget price 
      version of this symphony.
       
      John Quinn
       
      A straightforward, very reliable performance though others dig deeper.
    
       
        |  
           Support us financially 
            by purchasing this disc from 
         | 
      
       
        |  
          
         | 
         
          
         | 
      
       
        |  
          
         | 
         
          
         |