This disc preserves the programme that Pierre Boulez conducted to open the 
      2011 Salzburg Festival. It’s a shrewd, if unexpected, pairing of works. 
      According to Harald Hodeige’s booklet note, it was when Berg attended the 
      1901 première of Das klagende Lied that he fell under the spell 
      of Mahler’s music, of which he became thereafter an enthusiastic advocate.
       
      Pierre Boulez has steadily been working his way through Mahler’s music on 
      disc for DG, though this is the first of his recordings that I’ve heard. 
      However, I believe that Das klagende Lied may have been one of 
      his earliest forays into Mahler’s output. He made a recording of it many 
      years ago for CBS Sony, possibly as early as 1991, though I don’t believe 
      that recording is now widely available. I don’t know whether in that earlier 
      recording he incorporated Part I, ‘Waldmärchen’ (Forest Legend), but it’s 
      not included here. In many ways that’s a pity. It’s true that Mahler’s original 
      three-part scheme does sprawl a little – ‘Waldmärchen’ is nearly as long 
      as the other two parts put together and it does ramble a bit. On the other 
      hand, omitting the first part of the story makes little dramatic or narrative 
      sense. It’s been interesting to appraise Boulez’s new recording not long 
      after reviewing 
      another live performance, which did include ‘Waldmärchen’; that was a 1981 
      performance conducted by Gennadi Rozhdestvensky.
       
      Mahler wrote both the text and the music for this early cantata. He based 
      the text on a story that he found in an anthology of German folk tales, 
      onto which he grafted some elements of a tale by the Brothers Grimm. The 
      first part, which we don’t hear in this performance, sets the scene, telling 
      of two brothers who set out into the forest to find a flower; the queen 
      has promised to marry whoever can find and bring her a specimen of the flower 
      in question. The younger brother finds the flower but is murdered by his 
      sibling who steals the flower and sets off to claim the queen. In Part Two, 
      ‘Der Spielmann’ (The Minstrel), the minstrel of the title comes across a 
      bone from the murdered young man. He makes it into a flute which, when played, 
      tells the story of the murder. In Part Three, ‘Hochzeitstücke’ (Wedding 
      Piece), we see the wedding of the elder brother and the queen but the minstrel 
      spoils the party by arriving and playing his flute. When the brother accuses 
      him of the murder the queen’s castle falls to the ground and the tale comes 
      to a tragic end.
       
      The very first impression I had of this Boulez performance was that the 
      orchestral opening, which is characteristically clear and precise, sounded 
      a little cool and insufficiently red-blooded: it was not until the second 
      stanza of the tale (track 2) that things seemed to get cracking. However, 
      when subsequently I listened through headphones I felt that I had misjudged 
      the opening; it’s much more alert and lively than I’d first supposed. As 
      the tale unfolds the performance has excellent drive and dramatic thrust. 
      Indeed, at the tumultuous start of ‘Hochzeitstücke’ I wrote in my notes 
      “can this be P[ierre] B[oulez]?” In these pages he gets the orchestra to 
      portray excitingly the pageantry of the festivities in the castle while 
      the choir sings vividly. In fact, despite his reputation for coolness and 
      objectivity I detected no lack of drama and flair in Boulez’s reading of 
      the score as a whole. Yet at the same time his fabled ability to clarify 
      musical textures is very much in evidence.
       
      Making some comparisons between the Boulez and Rozhdestvensky recordings 
      was quite an interesting process. Leaving to one side the fact that Boulez 
      offers an incomplete version of the score, there are pluses and minuses 
      on both sides. Boulez enjoys the more refined recorded sound; after all, 
      Rozhdestvensky’s recording is over twenty years old and was not originally 
      intended for commercial release. The BBC Symphony Orchestra plays extremely 
      well for Rozhdestvensky; they respond to his urgent, dramatic direction 
      with playing that is often red-blooded and exciting. However, the playing 
      of the Wiener Philharmoniker is even more distinguished while lacking no 
      excitement. Both choirs do well though I have a slight preference for Rozhdestvensky’s 
      chorus, which may be a bit larger than the Viennese ensemble.
       
      Each set has one stand-out soloist. For Rozhdestvensky, Robert Tear sings 
      very well indeed, bringing great commitment to the tenor role. However, 
      there’s no denying that the demands of the part are cruel and one senses 
      that Tear is stretched to his limits at times. By contrast Boulez has, in 
      Johan Botha, a tenor who has essayed many of the big Wagner and Strauss 
      roles, and it shows. He clearly has far greater reserves of vocal power 
      at his disposal than the valiant Tear. However, the tables are turned when 
      it comes to the contralto role. In her first few phrases it seemed to me 
      that Anna Larsson’s vibrato was causing some notes to spread, slightly to 
      the detriment of pitch. However, she soon settles and she offers a good 
      deal of expressive, full-toned singing. However, Rozhdestvensky has an ace 
      up his sleeve in the form of Dame Janet Baker. She is simply outstanding, 
      singing all her music with a combination of great intensity and great intelligence. 
      I consider that she is much more exciting to hear in this piece even than 
      the excellent Miss Larsson.
       
      Writing of Rozhdestvensky’s direction I said that “[his] conducting is full 
      of energy and dramatic thrust. He knows this is a melodramatic tale so there’s 
      no point in underplaying things.” As I indicated earlier, I was surprised 
      – pleasantly so – at the extent to which Boulez conducts withenergy and 
      dramatic flair. I think his Russian rival, whose speeds are a notch faster 
      at several points in the score, achieves a narrow victory on points but 
      no-one who hears this Boulez performance will feel short-changed by the 
      conductor. There’s a revealing quote in the booklet from some years back. 
      Boulez apparently described Das klagende Lied as “a theatre of 
      the mind, with actual stage effects applied to the concert hall.” I feel 
      he’s appropriately theatrical in this performance yet the music is, as you’d 
      expect from this conductor, always carefully controlled.
       
      For his coupling Boulez offers Berg’s Lulu-Suite. I’m afraid Berg’s 
      music is an area of the repertoire with which I find it hard to get to grips 
      – and well-nigh impossible to love – though I’m sure the fault is mine. 
      Perhaps I would appreciate it more if I heard many more performances such 
      as this one. The orchestral playing throughout is delivered with fastidious 
      clarity and scrupulous attention to detail. There are a few conductors, 
      such as Salonen and Rattle, who have a wonderfully acute ear for texture 
      and balance but I’m not sure that anyone equals Boulez in this regard. Yet 
      his most impressive achievement, I think, is to elucidate detail without 
      losing sight of the bigger picture; and so he opens the music up for the 
      listener to enjoy either in close-up or in panoramic overview – or both. 
      My listening notes for this recording are liberally sprinkled with phrases 
      such as “gorgeous, delicate sounds”; “wonderful, subtle playing”; “utmost 
      refinement” and so on. Remember, these are the notes of someone who doesn’t 
      really like Berg’s music!
       
      The opening, ‘Rondo’, is a kaleidoscope of musical ideas and Boulez is an 
      absolute master of such scores. I really don’t feel I can comment on the 
      ‘Lied der Lulu’ movement since the angular vocal line leaves me cold. So 
      far as I can tell Anna Prohaska is completely undaunted by the taxing vocal 
      part. She returns in the final pages of the concluding ‘Adagio’ to sing 
      a fragment as the Countess Geschwitz. Before she sings in that movement 
      Boulez and the Wiener Philharmoniker have given a fabulous account of the 
      preceding six minutes of music. This is music that takes over where Mahler’s 
      Ninth leaves off. Aided by richly atmospheric orchestral playing, Boulez 
      unfolds it marvellously, making fine sense of Berg’s music. When the fearsome, 
      dissonant climax erupts (4:53) Boulez unleashed it thrillingly and then 
      controls the ferment expertly.
       
      As I’ve indicated earlier, the recorded sound on this disc is excellent 
      – the offstage band in the Mahler is expertly distanced. Boulez is a splendid 
      guide to both these scores and if you don’t mind having a foreshortened 
      account of Das klagende Lied this disc is a compelling proposition.
       
      John Quinn
       
      
Update 
My colleague Brian Wilson tells me 
	that Boulez recorded Das klagende Lied for CBS Sony even earlier 
	than I thought, and not as a single project. 'Waldmarchen' was issued on an 
	LP in 1970, coupled with the Adagio from the Tenth Symphony. The rest of the 
	work came later on a separate LP, though Sony subsequently combined the 
	elements of Das klagende Lied onto a single LP (SMK45841)
	   
	   
    
       
        |  
           Support us financially 
            by purchasing this disc from 
         | 
      
       
        |  
          
         | 
         
          
         | 
      
       
        |  
          
         | 
         
          
         |