One’s response to Zdenek Fibich’s work is going to be predicated upon 
          a musical version of a glass half-full or half-empty. Half full if you 
          hear music that revisits tried and tested forms and formulas without 
          striving for originality or experimentation instead writing attractive 
          and easily appealing pieces. Half-empty if the shades of Smetana or 
          Dvorák hang too heavily with Fibich’s limitations laid bare for all 
          to hear.
           
          Personally, I support the half-full view but even his most ardent sympathisers 
          would have trouble arguing that he is not the lesser composer to those 
          two great masters. Outside the region of his birth I suspect the opportunities 
          to hear his major works in the concert hall - let alone opera house 
          - are all but non-existent. With the recent publication of the 2013 
          BBC Proms Prospectus I had a quick look for Fibich in the Proms archive. 
          I know this is a far from scientific or balanced instant survey but 
          it 
is the most complete concert archive of the most consistently 
          imaginative Classical Music festival in the world. Fibich has had 
one 
          performance of 
one work - the Overture: A Night at Karlstein 
          (Castle), Op. 26 – and you have to go back to 1906 to find that! Does 
          he merit that degree of neglect? – absolutely not – so all the more 
          thanks for this new disc which purports to be Volume 1 of the orchestral 
          works.
           
          On disc Fibich has fared somewhat better – not that hard in the given 
          circumstances – but choices are still few and far between. Naxos competes 
          with itself in the form of a 1999 disc from Andrew Mogrelia of Symphonies 
          1 and 2 (8.553699). 
Järvi 
          recorded all three in Detroit for Chandos and these are still available 
          in various re-combinations. There is also a well-regarded historical 
          set - recorded in the 1950s and early 1960s mainly in mono - from 
Karel 
          Šejna. 
          The only other version I have heard is again on Supraphon (32CO-1091) 
          from Petr Vronský and the Brno State Philharmonic – an analogue recording 
          dating from 1984. So the field - together with Bohemia’s Woods - is 
          pretty much open. The conductor is Marek Štilec – in his mid-twenties 
          when this recording was made – at the helm of the Czech National Symphony 
          Orchestra.
           
          The disc does not start very auspiciously – Fibich was undoubtedly finding 
          his symphonic feet when he wrote this firstsymphony at the age of 27. 
          Form, and his handling of it is not as fluent as it would become. This 
          is most apparent in the rather over-extended serious opening movement. 
          Pastoral-Heroic is the most succinct definition I can come up with. 
          The themes, as so often with Fibich, have echoes of Brahms out of Dvorák 
          but his handling of them is just too earnest and academic. Štilec is 
          at his least impressive in the entire disc here. The music simply plods 
          along. Timings rarely tell the whole story but Štilec stretches this 
          movement out to 16:14 in comparison to Vronský’s 12:10. This slower 
          tempo makes the entire work ‘front-end’ heavy – the final three movements 
          barely reach the twenty minute mark in total. I have to say Vronský 
          does not feel 
that much faster. With no score to hand I wonder 
          if a judicious cut has been applied? Crucially the Brno performance 
          has much more light and shade as well as a fluent rubato. Štilec is 
          painfully literal. In this he is not helped by a cinematic recording 
          style which gives the orchestra a rather clinical glare albeit allowing 
          a lot of inner detail to register. It also deprives them of being able 
          to play very quietly. Not that the Supraphon engineering in 1984 would 
          have won any awards but it does allow for a more atmospheric and integrated 
          sound from the orchestra.
           
          Fortunately, things do improve significantly from that movement on. 
          In part I am sure this is because Fibich’s writing is better. The Scherzo 
          is placed second and while not overtly Bohemian in the way that similar 
          movements by Dvorák were, it captures the essence of a folk-polka most 
          appealingly. Again Vronský is substantially faster but Štilec’s weightier 
          approach simply feels earthier rather than stuck in the mud. I do like 
          the fact that the Czech National Symphony Orchestra is audibly an orchestra 
          from this part of the world. That might seem like a banally obvious 
          thing to say but I lament the loss of regional individuality in the 
          sound good orchestras make. These Czech wind and brass players are clearly 
          perpetuating the performance traditions of their musical ancestors and 
          to my ears that makes it all the better.
           
          Without a doubt Fibich is at his best when he is trying to be least 
          formal. The slow movement is an adagio with a sub-heading 
alla romanza. 
          In essence it becomes a most appealing song-without-words with bardic 
          harp chords accompanying woodwind-led songs. I particularly like the 
          duetting clarinets around the 2:00 mark (track 3). Štilec is very good 
          here at moulding the musical phrase although the relative glare of the 
          recording and the focus it gives to the front desks of the strings diminishes 
          the charm – the ‘package’ presented by Vronský with fractionally more 
          poise and a more integrated orchestral picture is again to be preferred. 
          Štilec does win out in the festive finale. Not Fibich’s finest compositional 
          hour as there are rather too many sequential scalic passages that smack 
          of page-filling. At least here the brashness of the recording, the virtuosity 
          of the playing and Štilec’s injection of extra pace makes one forget 
          or at least forgive the shortcomings even if Vronský’s presto coda brings 
          his interpretation to an exciting close.
           
          The ‘filler’ – 
Impressions from the Countryside Op.54 - proves 
          to be the reason collectors might well consider this disc. Douglas Bostock 
          did record this work on ClassicO CLASSCD255 with the Carlsbad Symphony 
          Orchestra. Again, that’s a performance I have not heard and one that 
          is currently available as a download or an expensive secondhand CD. 
          The Orchestral Suite as an independent musical form is something of 
          an anachronism today. Yet, in the 19
th Century it provided 
          composers with a vehicle to write a set of related movements without 
          the ‘burden’ of symphonic expectation. In many ways this lighter remit 
          suited a composer such as Fibich very well. In the twenty years since 
          he wrote the First Symphony – and just two before he died – Fibich had 
          honed his craft significantly and had a far better sense of his own 
          strengths as a composer. These are all evident here: assured if not 
          revelatory orchestration, an appealing melodic gift and just enough 
          harmonic spice to prevent his writing sounding superficial or trite. 
          Ultimately this might be considered high class light music but this 
          is not a pejorative remark in my mind. Perhaps his younger contemporaries 
          such as Suk or Novak would expand the emotional and technical boundaries 
          of such Suites but Fibich sets himself a goal which is well achieved.
           
          Each of the movements has a simple almost naďve title but Fibich skilfully 
          does not write music inappropriate to either that title or the scale 
          implied. So the opening 
Moonlit Night is a gentle study in 
          flowing string writing with definite echoes of 
Peer Gynt. Perhaps 
          here Štilec shows his inexperience by being too literal and again the 
          fluorescent-tube-lit recording allows less poetry in than one imagines 
          exists. The second movement is simply called 
Country Dance 
          in the manner of a 
Sousedská beloved of Dvorák in his sets 
          of 
Slavonic Dances. Here one is really able to relish the characterful 
          orchestral playing. Štilec finds good contrasts in the instrumental 
          interplay. I love the mellow horn sound. They feature again at the opening 
          of the third movement; 
Highlands Ho. The gentle horn-calls 
          and flowing lower strings inevitably evoke Smetana but without any great 
          detriment to Fibich. The climax is rather imposing perhaps evoking a 
          mountain vista before sinking swiftly back into the hushed atmosphere 
          of the opening. The closing two movements are substantially longer than 
          the three that precede them. The penultimate one is called 
Fireside 
          Talk. This opens with a perky clarinet led dance theme in ľ time. 
          Quite what the story being told around the fire is I can’t imagine. 
          This movement is clearly sectionalised – different stories perhaps? 
          – all characterised by a far lighter and more subtle orchestration than 
          Fibich employed in the Symphony. I particularly enjoyed a mournful tale 
          told by a beautifully woody bassoon (track 8 3:40) over gently pulsing 
          strings. For me this is the highlight of the disc – some enchanting 
          playing meeting a moment of compositional inspiration lovingly orchestrated. 
          The suite closes with a 
Village Dance. This is not immediately 
          the high-spirited affair one might assume it would be. In fact Fibich 
          treats the melodic material rather more academically than seems wholly 
          appropriate. His technical resources have by now developed to such a 
          degree that they allow him to explore the potential of the music much 
          more effectively than in the earlier work. It is a slightly downbeat 
          ending to the suite with the tacked-on coda sounding more dutiful than 
          inspired.
           
          Ultimately a solid rather than thrilling opening to this series but 
          one with enough interest to encourage a collector to return. It is to 
          be hoped that greater interpretative finesse and recording subtlety 
          will reveal unknown strengths in this composer as the series develops.
           
          
Nick Barnard