Felix MENDELSSOHN (1809-1847)
Violin Concerto in E minor, op. 64 [25:45]
The Hebrides (
Fingal’s Cave), op. 26 [9:00]
Violin Concerto in D minor (1822) [21:35]
Alina Ibragimova (violin)
Orchestra of the Age of Enlightenment/Vladimir Jurowski
rec. 2-4 September 2011, Henry Wood Hall, London, England
HYPERION CDA67795 [56:22]
Performances of E Minor Concerto used for comparison:
- Viktoria Mullova, O Révolutionnaire et Romantique/John Eliot
Gardiner (Philips)
- Janine Jansen, BBC SO/Roger Norrington (
Proms
performance)
Alina Ibragimova is one of my favorite performers, and I have purchased
all but two of her recordings. I was mightily impressed by her insightful
performances of the Bach Sonatas and Partitas (Hyperion CDA67691/2).
Her live Wigmore Hall recordings of the Beethoven’s Violin Sonatas
are among the finest performances ever recorded. I was excited at
the prospect of hearing her newest recording, and, for the most part,
I was not disappointed.
Here Ibragimova enters an overly crowded field of performances. Archivmusic.com
currently lists 227 recordings of the E minor concerto, and 36 of
the D minor concerto - which was a surprise to me, as I have never
heard the work before this performance. It must be daunting for any
violinist to issue a new recording of the E minor work, since it is
one of the most popular and oft-performed concertos in the violin
repertoire; those 200- plus recordings must present just about every
interpretative possibility.
Ibragimova’s performance suggests she perceives Mendelssohn
as a pure classicalist. She and conductor Jurowski downplays any aspect
of the music that might suggest Mendelssohn harbored any Romantic
inclinations. The performance uses very little rubato, and Jurowski
urges the orchestra ever forward, thereby creating a somewhat metrical
feeling to the phrasing. The orchestral accompaniment is absolutely
spotless, yet never boring, as the use of period instruments reveals
all kinds of interesting timbres and balances. The highlight of the
movement comes around 2.40 where Ibragimova ushers in the second theme
with a magical pianissimo, finally allowing herself a small amount
of rubato - the effect is spell-binding. The mood is immediately dispelled
by the flutes entry, which brings a return of the unrelenting forward
momentum. I am not advocating a lack of pulse, or a performance that
makes Mendelssohn sound like Mahler. However, the two performances
listed for comparison both feature a greater degree of flexibility
that gives Mendelssohn’s melodic writing a bit more room to
breathe. Mullova, in particular, finds a fragility in the second subject
that would melt the hardest heart, making Ibragimova’s rendering
seem somewhat prosaic in comparison.
Nevertheless, Ibragimova’s playing is never less than beautiful,
and in the second movement she allows herself greater interpretative
freedom which creates an intense inwardness that fully captures the
emotion of Mendelssohn’s writing.
The final movement brings a return of that propulsive driving energy,
though it certainly works well, especially when played with the easygoing
virtuosity displayed here. Yet I missed any sense of light-hearted
wit; Ibragimova and Jurowski seem too serious to have fun! Jansen’s
performance hits the ground running as well, but she and Norrington
find a playful lightness that suggests everyone involved is having
the time of their life. For this review I only listened to the Jansen
performance, but I have watched it several times over the years, and
I readily accept that the visual element of seeing Jansen’s
animated interaction with the orchestra and Norrington perhaps contributes
to the sense of fun I hear. So this is certainly a performance with
a great deal to admire, but I often found myself wondering whether
another conductor might draw out a more flexible and playful interpretation
from Ibragimova.
The Hebrides Overture is dispatched with energy and precision, but
is short on atmosphere, while the early Concerto in D minor, written
when Mendelssohn was only thirteen, features the same interpretative
profile found in the later concerto. Perhaps because I am unfamiliar
with this work, I did not find this performance as inflexible or overly
driven, and the second movement in particular features ravishing playing
by soloist and orchestra.
The recording is up to Hyperion’s excellent standards - has
this label ever released a poorly engineered recording? There is a
thrilling immediacy to the sound, placing the listener front and center,
just a few rows back from the performers. The orchestral work is wonderfully
conveyed, allowing many wonderful colors to emerge during the performance,
and the soloist is well balanced to the orchestra. The liner-notes,
by R. Larry Todd, are interesting and informative, and the orchestra
members are also listed in the booklet, something I have grown to
appreciate.
This is a thoughtful and beautifully prepared performance that nevertheless
fails to displace my favorite recordings. I have no doubt that Ibragimova’s
interpretation will continue to develop and mature; she is certainly
young enough that we may see another two or three recordings of this
repertoire by her in the years to come. I am glad to have heard her
interpretation, and you may feel differently about her concept of
the E minor concerto than I do. Rarely will you hear it played more
beautifully than it is here.
David A. McConnell
Masterwork Index: Concerto
in E minor