I wrote a 
review 
          of a CD of the Paul Juon Piano Quartets Opp. 37 and 50 in 2009 (CPO 
          777 278) and have been trying to work out why I have not heard of him 
          since then. As a result of hearing the present two significant and large-scale 
          chamber works I see Juon as a significant and imposing figure straddling 
          the cusp of late-romanticism and early modernism. Having said that the 
          Op. 22 Sextet demonstrates less of the latter than any of the other 
          works. Even so, there are several innovative features. 
            
          The 
Sextet takes up five tracks of this CD. The second and third 
          movements could be combined as they make up a rather noble and hymn-like 
          theme, stated first by the piano, followed by seven variations. Five 
          of these are in the elegiac 
Andantino quasi Allegretto (tr. 2) 
          and the remaining two in the shorter 
Minuetto (tr. 3); a nice 
          touch this. Even shorter is the 
Intermezzo which just adds a 
          much needed lightness before the rather Russian and rhythmic finale. 
          
            
          The main emphasis of the work lies however with the first movement which 
          is pretty much the length of the last three combined. It is marked 
Moderato. 
          There is a feel of Russian folk music in the first subject especially 
          when stated so baldly by the piano at the very start. The key of C minor 
          gives the music that serious Beethovenian edge. The second subject is 
          given, at least at first, to the viola. The minor key is foremost although 
          the exposition moves into the relative major towards the end. The key 
          and something about the piano writing will be reminiscent of Brahms 
          perhaps the Third Piano Quartet which is also in C minor. There is a 
          seriousness of purpose but also a strong melodic emphasis, divided equally 
          between the instruments. Juon is quoted in Jörg Hillebrand’s 
          excellent accompanying notes as having described his music “almost 
          throughout rather harsh and of gloomy Nordic colouration”. Harsh, 
          no, gloomy, no but there is a dark colouration brought about by the 
          generally low tessitura which he prefers. This is exemplified by the 
          use of two cellos as well as the viola and heavy bass chords. Don’t 
          let that put you off - this is moving and never uninteresting music, 
          which will involve you throughout its process. 
            
          The 
Quintet is a fully mature work in four movements. The eleven 
          minute opening 
Allegro moderato is a gushing and passionately 
          romantic utterance. It ends in bliss and serenity after a torrid affair. 
          This is a very impressive sonata structure incorporating one especially 
          sensitive passage without the piano in the development section. The 
          second movement is designated 
commodo. I remembered that in the 
          Op. 37 Piano Quartet Juon seemed to enjoy dance rhythms. This movement 
          is a sort of galumphing waltz. It’s not one you could dance to 
          in polite circles but on your own you might strum a hand or foot to 
          its pounding ostinati and drones - great stuff. 
            
          The 
Sostenuto third movement starts in the depths of the cello 
          and piano with a dark and very Nordic melody. It rises to three passionately 
          excitable climaxes before ending with an unexpectedly autumnal calm. 
          The finale is marked 
Risoluto - irato e con impeto. With its 
          occasional unison passages and piano octaves and indeed the rather earnest 
          fugue in its centre, 
Risoluto seems an appropriate term. It’s 
          an emotionally volatile movement which transports you from the Russian 
          ‘кафе’ (teashop) to the Церковь 
          (basilica) in seconds and back to the distress of being again human. 
          Also in some passages it can be difficult to pin down a regular time-signature. 
          Just as you think we are moving towards a calm and contented ending 
          Juon throws in another dozen bars of fervour before ending with a confident 
          final chord. 
            
          This is a terrific piece that I have found riveting on each playing. 
          It makes a perfect case for Juon’s rehabilitation as an important 
          figure especially in Russian chamber music. I believe there is also 
          much orchestral music yet to discover. Let’s hope that some of 
          these works, for example the concertos, might also soon appear. 
            
          The booklet essay tells us little about the music but a great deal about 
          the life of the composer. There are photos of the performers but there’s 
          no picture of the composer - rather a pity. 
            
          
Gary Higginson