Frédéric CHOPIN (1810-1849)
Seventeen Mazurkas: Op. 24 No. 4; Op. 30 Nos. 3 and 4; Op 63 Nos. 2 and 3; Op. 67 No. 4; Op. 50 No. 3; Op. 24 Nos. 1 and 2; Op. 56 No. 2; Op. 59 Nos. 1-3; Op. 67 Nos. 3 and 2; Op. 68 Nos. 2 and 4
Klara Min (piano)
rec. 17-18 September 2012, American Academy of Arts and Letters, New York City
DELOS DE 3443 [52:22]
Seventeen Mazurkas: Op. 24 No. 4; Op. 30 Nos. 3 and 4; Op 63 Nos. 2 and 3; Op. 67 No. 4; Op. 50 No. 3; Op. 24 Nos. 1 and 2; Op. 56 No. 2; Op. 59 Nos. 1-3; Op. 67 Nos. 3 and 2; Op. 68 Nos. 2 and 4
Klara Min (piano)
rec. 17-18 September 2012, American Academy of Arts and Letters, New York City
DELOS DE 3443 [52:22]
I originally listened to a few of these tracks in poor
streaming sound and with bad headphones and disliked them, but that turned
out to be a good thing. The appeal of Klara Min’s Chopin is hard to bring
off in bad sound. That appeal lies in the glowing tone of her piano, closely
but certainly not claustrophobically recorded, and the subtlety with which
she inflects these mazurkas’ rhythms. It turns out that this is actually
an excellent disc.
For one thing, Klara Min luckily picks out as her seventeen favorite mazurkas almost all of my own favorites; for another, her rhythmic sense is, as mentioned, unerring, with any slight hesitations or halts in the dance step carefully judged. This isn’t the softest-edged or most poetic of interpretations - see Garrick Ohlsson and Ivan Moravec - but it’s not a clattering rush, either; Min finds a middle path. The melodies tend to be distinctive but well-crafted: contrast with Russell Sherman’s recent recording, where Sherman also attempts to put a new stamp on many of these pieces but often misjudges or simply sounds bizarre. Op. 56 No. 2 is a great example of why Klara Min is so good: the main tune is very sensitively delivered, but the piece still manages to rock.
Others have criticized her micro-managing, and it is true that just about every phrase, every pause, is very carefully calibrated. That’s not to say they don’t sound spontaneous; they do, certainly, for the most part, with maybe Op. 67 No. 3 and other very short pieces the most noticeably studied. If you’re distracted by such playing, you should take this under consideration; Min’s playing is not as free and casual as some, and it’s not as lyrically inclined as others Ohlsson, say, on Hyperion, or Moravec; the contrast with Moravec is strong in Op. 68 No. 2, where Min carefully singles out every trill note while Moravec favors an impressionistic cloud. I certainly found much to enjoy here, and I’ll be happy to listen to more from this pianist when it arrives. The booklet is exceptionally in-depth, with words on every mazurka, and a two-and-a-half page artist biography which could have used a good trim.
Brian Reinhart
Very good Chopin which uses strong rhythms to transcend my poor first impression.
For one thing, Klara Min luckily picks out as her seventeen favorite mazurkas almost all of my own favorites; for another, her rhythmic sense is, as mentioned, unerring, with any slight hesitations or halts in the dance step carefully judged. This isn’t the softest-edged or most poetic of interpretations - see Garrick Ohlsson and Ivan Moravec - but it’s not a clattering rush, either; Min finds a middle path. The melodies tend to be distinctive but well-crafted: contrast with Russell Sherman’s recent recording, where Sherman also attempts to put a new stamp on many of these pieces but often misjudges or simply sounds bizarre. Op. 56 No. 2 is a great example of why Klara Min is so good: the main tune is very sensitively delivered, but the piece still manages to rock.
Others have criticized her micro-managing, and it is true that just about every phrase, every pause, is very carefully calibrated. That’s not to say they don’t sound spontaneous; they do, certainly, for the most part, with maybe Op. 67 No. 3 and other very short pieces the most noticeably studied. If you’re distracted by such playing, you should take this under consideration; Min’s playing is not as free and casual as some, and it’s not as lyrically inclined as others Ohlsson, say, on Hyperion, or Moravec; the contrast with Moravec is strong in Op. 68 No. 2, where Min carefully singles out every trill note while Moravec favors an impressionistic cloud. I certainly found much to enjoy here, and I’ll be happy to listen to more from this pianist when it arrives. The booklet is exceptionally in-depth, with words on every mazurka, and a two-and-a-half page artist biography which could have used a good trim.
Brian Reinhart
Very good Chopin which uses strong rhythms to transcend my poor first impression.
Support
us financially by purchasing this disc from |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|