I have been looking forward to Peter Hill’s 
          recording of J.S. Bach’s 
Well-Tempered Clavier Book 1 since 
          hugely enjoying his 
Book II which came out in 2012 (see 
review). 
          Those of you who have already discovered the “control and poetry” 
          in that 
Book II will know why they simply must have this 
Book 
          I, and Hill’s undemonstrative but highly involving sound and 
          character draws you in from the outset. 
            
          Peter Hill plays Bach as if in one-to-one communion with the composer, 
          while at the same time sharing it with you, the listener, also on a 
          one-to-one basis. This intimate love triangle eschews concert hall flashiness, 
          holding the deeper resonances and brighter colours of the piano in reserve 
          for particular musical points. It confides and reveals the genius of 
          the composer rather than the brilliant musicianship of the performer, 
          while at the same time keeping the notes singing and alive, the rhythms 
          sprightly and filled with their essential line-fuelled but oft-restrained 
          Baroque energy. Ornamentation is kept to a minimum, so when the occasional 
          extra note or twirl come forth it sounds like a special little treat. 
          Without skimping on expression, Hill spares the music from over-romantic 
          distortions or wilful individuality. He does however stretch more in 
          the slower pieces than, for instance, 
Arthur 
          Villar. The 
Prelude No. IV in C sharp minor is a case in 
          point, where Hill sustains the music’s peaks and brings time itself 
          into slower realms. Villar is by no means inexpressive in this, “one 
          of the jewels of Book 1”, but Hill really does take us into other 
          worlds. 
            
          The points and comparisons I made with Peter Hill’s 
Book II 
          apply in equal measure to this 
Book I. His detailed booklet notes 
          describe each and every prelude and fugue, and reveal a keen awareness 
          of the architecture of the work. This includes its division into various 
          sections, and in performance the pacing and placement of each prelude 
          and fugue within the whole is certainly more keenly felt here than in 
          some other versions. As before, Hill uses the expressive nature of the 
          piano to perform Bach, by no means attempting to recreate harpsichord 
          effects, but at the same time keeping within an idiom which, to our 
          modern ears at least, presents the composer in compelling and expressively 
          potent ways. Take the slow, spread chords of the 
Prelude No. 8 in 
          E flat minor. The sustained eloquence of the melodic notes and the 
          gentle stresses of the shifting harmonies beneath have a universal effect 
          of movingly human expression: a 
sarabande which “rises 
          to that of an impassioned, dramatic scena.” Hill keeps his passion 
          in proportion, but the implied drama is unmistakable. Tempi are perhaps 
          a little slower than we’ve been used to in preludes such as 
Nos. 
          13 & 
14, but the sense of logic and flow in the music 
          has its own feel of correctness, placing the musicianship of their performance 
          beyond complaint. He is also not without wit, as the amusingly quirky 
          discourse of the 
Fugue in A major demonstrates. 
            
          Do I have any criticisms? No, not really. Hill is neither extreme nor 
          controversial, and he doesn’t seek to add layers of profundity 
          where the depth in the pieces can stand for itself. This said, the understated 
          strength of his performances is instantly recognisable once you’ve 
          been immersed into his vision of Bach on the piano, and I sincerely 
          doubt you will feel short-changed at any point. 
            
          As with any really good set of Bach’s 
WTC I am happy to 
          take each recording on its merits, and willing to apply these to my 
          own moments of appreciation. 
Angela 
          Hewitt will always have her way of taking me by surprise, of making 
          me stop in my tracks and revise my ways of thinking about or viewing 
          the world. 
Roger 
          Woodward delivers a different kind of inspiration, personal and 
          challenging at the same time, as do 
Sergey 
          Schepkin, 
Abdel 
          Rahman El Bacha, 
Vardo 
          Rumessen and others. The rather special 
Sviatoslav 
          Richter will always be there if I feel like going down memory lane, 
          my scratchy ex-library CBS copy of Glenn Gould has its permanent place 
          in the side pocket of my car door, and 
András 
          Schiff’s set is on the want list. Each has their own individual 
          voice in this music, and each shows different sides of Bach’s 
          remarkable powers. Peter Hill’s Bach is the one to which I will 
          turn when the evening air is still, and both the sinking sun and rising 
          moon are gazing at each other across a midsummer sky full of tastefully 
          subtle but mouthwateringly fruity colours. 
            
          
Dominy Clements