One doubts that the world will ever wholly manage to come to 
                  terms with the music of Hovhaness. The sheer volume of his output 
                  – over five hundred works including seven operas and sixty-seven 
                  symphonies, and that excludes his music before 1940 much of 
                  which was destroyed by the composer – rivals the prolixity of 
                  seventeenth century composers such as Bach or Vivaldi. As we 
                  get to know more of his works, it also becomes apparent that 
                  like Bach or Vivaldi, Hovhaness had a tendency to recycle his 
                  music, so that ideas originally conceived for one medium or 
                  context will reappear in another later work; but even so, the 
                  fact that he was so prolific makes it difficult to grasp his 
                  achievement as a whole.
                   
                  However we can now appreciate that his works seem to fall into 
                  three distinct ‘periods’ – first an early Nordic style influenced 
                  by Sibelius, which he abandoned in the late 1930s when he came 
                  to terms with his Armenian heritage, much of the music of this 
                  period being then destroyed: a second period of twenty years 
                  in which he wrote much of what has now become his best-known 
                  music such as the second symphony Mysterious Mountain 
                  and The prayer of St Gregory, characterised by a fusion 
                  of mysticism and strict contrapuntal discipline: and then a 
                  third experimental period in which he began to explore wider 
                  musical traditions including oriental music. He changed his 
                  name from Alan Vaness Chakmakjian initially to Alan Hovaness 
                  (without the second h), and only then to the name by 
                  which we recognise him today; it is perhaps unfortunate that 
                  (according to Jim Svejda) the name “bears a resemblance to an 
                  exceedingly vulgar Czech word for the by-product of a basic 
                  bodily function.”
                   
                  The works on this disc are nearly all early works, and centre 
                  around the three Armenian Rhapsodies written in 1944 
                  – the widely different opus numbers are misleading, since apparently 
                  it was only at this period that Hovhaness began to catalogue 
                  his works and the assignation of numbers to the music he had 
                  already written at the time was largely arbitrary, as he explains 
                  in an often amusing interview given in 1981 which is reproduced 
                  in the substantial and informative insert booklet. These rhapsodies 
                  are conscious efforts to reclaim his Armenian roots and are 
                  strongly reminiscent in form of similar works by Enescu and 
                  other nationalist composers, following the model of Liszt, to 
                  create pieces based on national folksongs. The results are lively 
                  and entertaining, but not particularly redolent of what one 
                  might now identify as the ‘Hovhaness sound’. The Second 
                  Rhapsody develops into a series of at first decidedly un-nationalist 
                  fugues – although the Armenian influences eventually come to 
                  dominate the music before it stops rather abruptly. The Third 
                  Rhapsody is particularly beautiful.
                   
                  The tone poem Song of the sea predates Hovhaness’s 
                  assignation of opus numbers to his catalogue of works, and is 
                  one of the few works from the 1930s to escape his wholesale 
                  destruction of his scores at that time – in the manuscript he 
                  gave his name as ‘Hovaness’. It opens with a thoroughly romantic 
                  piano solo, and it is most certainly not the sort of 
                  music that we now associate with Hovhaness: there are elements 
                  which remind one of Moeran, of all people, with references to 
                  folksong melodies of decidedly Celtic bent. The work was dedicated 
                  to the British-born painter Hugh Hegh, and one could perhaps 
                  speculate that these overtones might have been a deliberate 
                  tribute to him. The title apparently derives from the Book of 
                  Exodus, but since Hovhaness in his interview states positively 
                  that he always assigned his titles after the music 
                  was written - does that contention really apply to works such 
                  as the precisely programmatic Mount St Helen’s Symphony? 
                  - this may or may not be of relevance. It is a really beautiful 
                  piece in its own right, and John McDonald plays the solo part 
                  with just the right delicacy of touch.
                   
                  The Saxophone Concerto has a much later opus number 
                  than the other works on this disc, and dates from as late as 
                  1980; but the booklet notes refer to it has harking back to 
                  Hovhaness’s earliest musical idiom – and one wonders whether 
                  here he is recycling music from that period. Indeed the very 
                  opening brings hints of Mysterious Mountain with its 
                  sequence of unrelated modal chords before the soprano saxophone 
                  enters surprisingly in its very lowest register. It is odd how 
                  the instrument has developed two such diametrically opposed 
                  styles of playing during the twentieth century, with two such 
                  totally different timbres. Radnofsky has a very rich 
                  and almost jazz-influenced tone; one can imagine this concerto 
                  being played to greater advantage with a more etiolated ‘classical’ 
                  style and less ‘body’. In the second movement he brings a ‘bluesy’ 
                  swing to the beautiful opening theme that seems very far removed 
                  from what one suspects Hovhaness had in mind; although finely 
                  done in itself, it seems to be at odds with the music, and the 
                  result just does not sound like Hovhaness at all. The finale 
                  brings a very Hovhanessian chorale theme on strings alone, but 
                  once again the playing of Radnofsky could be less vibrato-laden 
                  to the advantage of the music. On the other hand one is grateful 
                  to be able to hear the piece at all.
                   
                  Many of Hovhaness’s works were recorded during his lifetime, 
                  mainly in recordings conducted by the composer himself where 
                  the playing and recording sometimes left a good deal to be desired. 
                  The Exile Symphony was also recorded by Gerard Schwarz 
                  in the 1990s when he inaugurated a series of Hovhaness recordings 
                  for Delos (DE3168) - now deleted but presumably scheduled for 
                  reissue by Naxos at some stage. It is therefore only here that 
                  this disc comes into direct competition with other recordings. 
                  The Boston Modern Orchestra Project has a praiseworthy record 
                  for the production of many worthwhile recordings of works otherwise 
                  unavailable; and in this symphony their performance is at least 
                  the equal of the admirable Schwarz recording. The sound is slightly 
                  more distant at the beginning, but beautifully phrased and played. 
                  The music can take a number of different treatments. The big 
                  orchestral outbursts later have all the power and body that 
                  one could desire. There are decided overtones of Bloch in some 
                  of this music. Rose is consistently slower than Schwarz in the 
                  outer movements - slightly faster in the Grazioso - 
                  and overall his performance is three minutes longer than Schwarz’s, 
                  quite a difference in such a short work. The contrasted recording 
                  acoustics make quite a difference, and Rose’s players phrase 
                  the deceptively simple second movement - added when the composer 
                  revised the score in 1970 - with just the right degree of grace. 
                  Incidentally there is also a recording by Stokowski and the 
                  NBC orchestra available on Guild 
                  which includes the original second movement - a piece of mock-Biblical 
                  epic music which is not a patch on its replacement - but the 
                  abysmal recording quality rules this out totally of consideration. 
                  This quite apart from the ridiculously frenetic speed that Stokowski 
                  adopts in the final movement, over 30% faster than Rose takes 
                  here and 10% faster than Schwarz, allowing the music absolutely 
                  no time at all to expand or make its impact.
                   
                  One might regret that Rose and his players did not take the 
                  opportunity to let us hear more early Hovhaness – possibly his 
                  beautiful and brief Op.2 Monadnock, given a broadcast 
                  performance a few years back by Ken Young with the BBC Scottish 
                  Symphony Orchestra but never commercially recorded. Nevertheless 
                  Rose’s performance of the symphony, giving the music all the 
                  time it needs to breathe, is really something that it would 
                  have been a shame to miss. Works like the Exile Symphony 
                  give the lie in performances like this to the characterisation 
                  of Hovhaness as simply ‘new age’ music that can appeal only 
                  to those who share the composer’s fascination with mysticism.
                   
                  If you love the music of Hovhaness – and it really is 
                  very loveable – then this recording is an absolute must. We 
                  get a superb performance of the Exile Symphony, three 
                  gloriously contrasted Armenian Rhapsodies and a valuable 
                  glimpse into Hovhaness’s earliest style in Song of the sea. 
                  If you are pathologically allergic to Hovhaness, then this disc 
                  will not convert you; but then you will be beyond salvation 
                  anyway.
                   
                  Paul Corfield Godfrey 
                  
                  See also reviews by Rob 
                  Barnett and Dan 
                  Morgan