If you’re anything like me then you’ll have heard of Boccherini 
                  and you’ll have heard a little of his music, but he’ll mostly 
                  be a blank for you. He was well renowned in his day, serving 
                  at the royal courts of Vienna and Madrid, but his reputation 
                  has suffered since, not least because he was composing at the 
                  same time as his (indisputably greater) contemporaries Haydn 
                  and Mozart. I came to this disc with an open mind, hoping to 
                  be wowed and won over by some music that had been unjustly neglected. 
                  In the end, though, I found it diverting but rather bland in 
                  places and not an especially satisfying experience on the whole.
                   
                  When I saw the title of this disc I was immediately intrigued 
                  by the idea of a string quartet playing with guitar, but my 
                  first problem is that Boccherini doesn’t do anything particularly 
                  interesting with the combination. More often than not it’s a 
                  string quartet playing, with a barely audible guitar somewhere 
                  in the background. On the occasions when the guitar does come 
                  to the fore, such as in the fourth quintet, the results are 
                  very pleasing. The quintets were all written as a homage to 
                  Spain, the composer’s adoptive home, and this quintet has a 
                  more Spanish tinge than most of the others; it’s even nicknamed 
                  the “Fandango” after the lively dance in the finale. It has 
                  an airy first movement, relaxed and atmospheric, evocative to 
                  me of a hot Spanish afternoon. The finale is a toe-tapping dance 
                  which is engaging and energetic. The guitar really takes off 
                  here, which is the key to the work’s success. The inspiration 
                  drops in the slow movement, however, which is too often self-conscious, 
                  insistent and repetitious, to my ears at least. I’m afraid it 
                  was this rather pedestrian quality that I noticed again and 
                  again as I listened to this set. The D minor quintet (No. 1) 
                  is refined but a little strait-jacketed, showcasing the sort 
                  of thing that hasn’t won Boccherini many modern fans. The minor 
                  key of the music is austere in its own way, but it completely 
                  lacks the genuine drama that, say, Haydn or Mozart would have 
                  invested in a D minor work. The slow movement sounds bland and 
                  a little disengaged, followed by a genial - dare I say, harmless?- 
                  Minuet and a finale which is busy without grabbing the attention 
                  too much. The E major quintet (No. 2) is also rather self-conscious, 
                  as if looking at itself in the mirror and insisting to the listener 
                  how fine it is. I, on the other hand, found it a little wearying 
                  and it didn’t hold my attention, though the sheer pomposity 
                  of the third movement is diverting for a few minutes.
                   
                  Not everything is like this, however: I liked the smiling warmth 
                  of the D major quintet (No. 5) with its genteel first movement 
                  which then returns as the subject of variations in the finale. 
                  I quite enjoyed the B flat bustle of No. 3. Too much of the 
                  music is really quite forgettable, though, and I think that, 
                  if I return to this set, it will probably be as background music 
                  for a dinner party rather than something to concentrate on in 
                  a sitting.
                   
                  None of this is to cast any aspersions on the playing, which 
                  is warm, loving and accurate. It’s a little bland at times though, 
                  to be fair to the Dimovs, they aren’t given much to go on. This 
                  is a set that is probably for die-hard classicists only.
                   
                  Simon Thompson