This opera, first performed in 1876 under the title Vakula
the Smith, but re-titled and revised eleven years later,
has not been recorded frequently. The first recording was made
in 1948 by Bolshoi forces under Alexander Melik-Pashayev, and
the pretty awful quality of the sound has not prevented the
performance from remaining intermittently in the catalogue on
various labels ever since. A subsequent Russian recording in
1974 under Vladimir Fedoseyev - although inferior as a vocal
performance - was much better recorded. It was made available
internationally for a period but its subsequent availability
has been patchy. However both these recordings were quite heavily
cut - about half an hour trimmed from the whole - and it seems
that this recording, made live in Sardinia in 2000, was the
first to give us the score complete even at the cost of requiring
three CDs instead of two for the earlier issues. Brilliant Classics
have already issued this performance originally on Dynamic as
part of their complete 60 CD Tchaikovsky edition (review),
and now make the opera available separately. There have been
a number of revivals in recent years - including a Covent Garden
production in 2009 which has also found it way both onto CD
and Blu-Ray.
So much for the recording history: what of the music? It is
somewhat ironic that a composer like Tchaikovsky, who poured
such a wealth of melody into his ballets and orchestral scores,
seems to have so often faltered when it came to his operas.
Even works like Eugene Onegin and The Queen of Spades,
both of which have made their way into the international repertory,
are wanting in memorable material and lack the tunefulness of
his other works. While these better-known operas have
a dramatic drive which overcomes this, the highly whimsical
plot of The slippers cannot hope to command the same
degree of dramatic commitment from performers or audiences which
would enable it to grab the attention in the same way. Nevertheless
Tchaikovsky himself thought very highly of the score even in
its original form, and preserved much of the 1876 version in
his later revision.
A word about the presentation of this release. Brilliant Classics
state on the back of the box that a libretto is available on
their website, but this gives an English translation only which
does not help one to follow the text being sung. At the same
time the booklet note, although it contains four pages of notes
on the work itself - in English translation only, presumably
deriving from an Italian original - has no summary of the plot
or any description of the scenes. The tracks are listed in detail,
but this nevertheless leaves the listener somewhat in the dark.
The list of characters gives no indication even of the range
of the voices of the various characters, and the transliteration
of their names does not always correspond with the basic synopses
available from sites such as Wikipedia. For the convenience
of potential listeners I have given the ranges of voices in
the headnote to this review, and have rationalised some of the
transliterations; but the vocal score is available online
and this gives the text in Russian with a German transliteration
which is of some assistance in following the plot.
Following the score therefore with the help of the vocal score,
it is a pleasure to be able to report that Rozhdestvensky (as
one might expect) gets a thoroughly musically committed response
from the Cagliari orchestra in the Prelude, a much more
substantial piece than its equivalents in Eugene Onegin
or The Queen of Spades. One can tell immediately that
the players are thoroughly enjoying themselves although the
horn in the prelude could be smoother. While there could be
more violins in the orchestra they produce a nicely substantial
sound despite a rather dry acoustic. Even so one could imagine
a more romantic sound from them in their big tunes at 8.00 and
10.00 - the brass very predominant at the latter point. The
applause from the audience at the end of the Prelude
sounds rather luke-warm.
The first voice which we hear is that of Ludmila Shemchuk, a
known quantity from a number of other Russian opera recordings
- somewhat eccentrically here transliterated as Semciuk. Here
is a solid singer free of any hint of Slavonic wobble. She is
confronted by the Devil Bes who is sung with similarly firm
tone by Albert Schagidullin. The voices are balanced rather
forward of the orchestra, but plenty of instrumental detail
comes through; and they display a nice light touch in their
ensuing duet. In the following scene the dying-down of the snowstorm
brings from Tchaikovsky one of his long series of running descending
scales - think of the passage towards the end of 1812
- which rather outstay their welcome, especially at Rozhdestvensky’s
rather ponderous speed.It’s hardly Molto più
mosso as the score indicates.
The entry of Oxana (or Oksana as transliterated here) brings
the first of the major singers to our attention. Ekaterina Morosova
is very good, and again there is no hint of Slavonic vibrato.
She is charming in her artlessly strophic opening aria which
includes a nicely delicate top C at the end. That said, one
could hope for a more heartfelt response from the violins at
1.44 and elsewhere. Her lover Vakula, who now arrives, is also
very well taken by Valery Popov. The role requires a lyric tenor
with plenty of heroic timbre and Popov impresses immediately
in his aria, ringing out on the high notes with no sense of
strain whatsoever. The First Act concludes with an extended
and acrimonious duet - with chorus towards the end - for the
two of them. They strike the right sort of sparks off each other
and are well matched when they sing together. The other principal
is Vladimir Ognovenko in the role of the heroine’s father
Chub - Cub in the transliteration here - who is also firm of
voice if rather unyielding of tone, and never really sounds
genial even in the final scene of reconciliation.
The opening scene of the Second Act is boisterously comic, but
the second scene features a nicely dramatic final section where
Morosova and Popov again are well matched - she produces a stunning
cadenza rising to top C which features some very well handled
trills. Her vigorous singing in the ensuing chorus provokes
some premature applause before the finale has properly concluded.
At the end we get a really good tune, first sung by Popov with
interjections from Morosova and the chorus, and then briefly
expanded in the orchestra under the closing pages of the act.
It is a pity we never hear it again.
The Third Act opens with a very odd chorus where bars of 5/4
persistently interrupt the regular 3/4 rhythm - shades of the
second movement of the Pathétique - but unfortunately
the basic melodic material is not very memorable. There is a
good deal of unexplained stage noise in the foreground which
sounds rather like people traipsing through polythene. Incidentally
there is a very minor cut here, with a literal repeat of part
of the chorus omitted - Fedoseyev makes the same snip. This
is followed a few minutes later by an extended aria for Vakula
which is entirely missing from page 209 of the vocal score and
which Fedoseyev also includes. Is it perhaps an interpolation
from the original Vakula the Smith? Whatever it may be,
it is well worth its restoration and Popov sings it very nicely.
The scene moves to the imperial court and we are greeted with
a Polonaise that sounds for all the world like a sketch
for the similar movement in Eugene Onegin and which receives
its own round of applause from the audience. In the ensuing
scene the Prince - or, as Brilliant have it, “His Serene
Highness” - has a folksy sort of pair of couplets which
sound disturbingly like a bass version of Orlovsky welcoming
his guests to the ball in Fledermaus. We are given both
verses of these, which is fair enough as Grigory Osipov sings
them engagingly and displays a good solid high F. The other
dances which follow - a minuet, a Russian dance and a Cossack
dance - are nothing special and certainly not a patch on the
similar pieces in The Nutcracker, although the audience
interrupts the performance to applaud the dancers in the latter
two movements.
The short Fourth Act fits neatly onto the third CD after the
previous one. It opens with a lamenting duet for the two principal
females, and Morosova blends well with the more naturally powerful
Schemchuk in their passages in thirds. Later Shemchuk transposes
some of her deeper passages up from the pitches shown in the
vocal score so that she continues to sing a third rather than
a octave below Morosova. One would think that it would have
been worth preserving the contrasting treatment - Shemchuk has
no problems with similarly subterranean passages elsewhere and
Fedoseyev gives the passage as written. Again the audience interrupts
the action with applause for the following chorus, presumably
for the dancers whose movements can be clearly heard on the
recording. The closing chorus with its gusli imitations
clearly shows the influence of Glinka - incidentally a clear
misprint at the beginning of page 293 of the vocal score in
Oxana’s part is corrected. The audience interrupts the
final chords with sustained but not over-enthusiastic applause,
and we are then given a reprise of the orchestral part of the
final chorus - presumably to accompany curtain-calls.
The supporting cast is generally workmanlike and sometimes more
than that, although Vladimir Okenko is not ideally precise in
the opening notes of his plaintive little song. As the only
Italian in the cast, Fabio Bonavita seems to be thoroughly at
home in the Russian language, as do the hard-working chorus,
although the upper tenor line could be stronger particularly
in their offstage scene in the second scene of the Second Act;
they get better once they get - somewhat noisily - on to the
stage.
It may be noted that I have said very little about the plot,
which is really nonsensical. Vakula is told by his beloved Oxana
that she will not marry him unless he brings her a pair of the
tsarina’s slippers. Vakula commandeers the help of the
Devil to transport him to St Petersburg, where his request is
granted with such little fuss that one wonders why he needed
diabolical help in the first instance. Everything ends happily
and nobody seems any the worse for the experience. Tchaikovsky
hangs some charming music on this trivial scenario, but there
is not much to engage his dramatic attention. One can see why
he was fond of the score, and thought it worth revision but
it is no masterpiece and several of his other operas have more
serious claims on the attention of modern listeners.
However if you want an absolutely complete audio recording of
this opera, there is only one choice and that is this one. Of
the abridged recordings, if you don’t mind really awful
sound the old Bolshoi 1948 performance is somewhat better than
the rather paler but better recorded Fedoseyev - which suffers
like its predecessor from a balance that emphasises the voices
at the expense of the orchestra. Otherwise the version here
is not at all a bad representation of the score, although one
does wish that Cagliari could have furnished Rozhdestvensky
with more and stronger violins. The playing on the Fedoseyev
set shows what can be achieved in a modern recording with bigger
forces. The theatre has achieved a good record with their performances
of neglected Russian operas. Their recent recording of Rimsky-Korsakov’s
Invisible city of Kitezh arguably rivalled that of the
Kirov. This recording shows that this reputation rests on good
foundations.
Paul Corfield Godfrey