Although this disc comprises music for Advent and Christmas 
                  by three composers, the central figure is Johann Stadlmayr to 
                  whom the largest part of the liner-notes is devoted. He is one 
                  of the lesser-known composers of the 17th century, and his oeuvre 
                  is not well represented in the catalogue. 
                    
                  Stadlmayr was born in Freising in Bavaria. The first sign of 
                  his activities as a composer is a collection of 8-part masses 
                  which - according to a catalogue from 1611 - was printed in 
                  1596; this collection has been lost. After the turn of the century 
                  he entered the service of the archbishop of Innsbruck; in 1604 
                  he was appointed vice-Kapellmeister and then Kapellmeister. 
                  In 1607 he was appointed to a similar position at the court 
                  of Archduke Maximilian II. Stadlmayr remained in Innsbruck for 
                  the rest of his life. The years from 1618 to 1624 were difficult, 
                  though. Maximilian died in 1618 and his successor, Leopold V, 
                  disbanded the court chapel. It was hard for Stadlmayr to support 
                  his large family; for that reason he worked as a government 
                  meat inspector. In 1619 his wife died; he remarried in 1621. 
                  It was apparently his application for a post in Vienna which 
                  made Leopold change his mind. Stadlmayr was restored to his 
                  former position with an increased salary. It was the start of 
                  a golden era for the chapel. After Leopold's death in 1632 his 
                  widow continued to support the chapel, despite the heavy financial 
                  burden of the Thirty Years War. She also made the publication 
                  of some of Stadlmayr's compositions financially possible. 
                    
                  Stadlmayr's oeuvre is quite large, and comprises only sacred 
                  music. He was held in high esteem, as the dissemination of his 
                  works and their inclusion in various anthologies show. Michael 
                  Praetorius praised him as "noble contrapunctista and musician". 
                  In his early works he is clearly influenced by the style which 
                  was practised in Venice. This disc contains one example, the 
                  Missa Jubilate Deo from a collection of 8-part masses 
                  which was printed in 1610. In his works from this period he 
                  juxtaposes polyphonic episodes and passages with homophony. 
                  He also pays much attention to the optimal clarity of the text. 
                  The Venetian influence is the reason that four pieces by Giovanni 
                  Gabrieli are included in the programme. 
                    
                  We also hear two pieces from the Kleine Geistliche Konzerte 
                  by Heinrich Schütz. These reflect the modern concertante 
                  style from Italy which was also practised by Monteverdi. The 
                  reason is that in Stadlmayr's later works traces of this style 
                  can be found. You can hear this in the collection of motets, 
                  from which the other pieces on this disc are taken, and which 
                  was printed in 1645. In these motets solo episodes in monodic 
                  style are embedded in a polyphonic texture for the full ensemble. 
                  In the liner-notes it is mentioned that before Stadlmayr's oeuvre 
                  was thoroughly explored several of his works were attributed 
                  to Schütz. This is an indication that there are some stylistic 
                  similarities. These would have come more clearly to the fore 
                  if some works from Schütz's oeuvre had been chosen which 
                  show stronger similarity in structure with those of Stadlmayr. 
                  
                    
                  In most pieces the voices are joined by the instruments of Les 
                  Cornets Noirs: two violins, two cornetts and four sackbuts, 
                  with cello, theorbo and organ playing the basso continuo. In 
                  Giovanni Gabrieli's motets the addition of instruments was usually 
                  left to the performers, but in Stadlmayr's works the instruments 
                  have independent parts, which is another sign of their modern 
                  character. 
                    
                  The singing of the choir and the playing of the instruments 
                  is generally very good. The soloists also do a good job in the 
                  solo passages in the motets, and they sing the two sacred concertos 
                  by Schütz very well. So far so good. The approach of this 
                  repertoire is based on a fundamental misunderstanding, though. 
                  The list of performers includes seven soloists, a choir and 
                  an instrumental ensemble. In the 17th century there were no 
                  such things as vocal soloists and choirs in sacred music. Pieces 
                  like these were sung by an ensemble whose members took care 
                  of solo passages when necessary. The Orpheus Chor München 
                  is a fine ensemble but far too large for this repertoire. The 
                  members are not listed in the booklet, but if the picture is 
                  anything to go by then their number is over fifty. The effects 
                  are detrimental: the contrasts between soli and tutti are too 
                  large and the solo passages are not naturally integrated in 
                  the ensemble. There is a lack of transparency which sometimes 
                  makes the text hard to understand. Passages in a swift tempo, 
                  for instance at the end of Gabrieli's O Jesu mi dulcissime, 
                  would have gained from the agility a smaller vocal group possesses. 
                  
                    
                  I don't really understand why Gerd Guglhör insists - as 
                  in previous recordings - on performing 17th-century music with 
                  such large forces. It’s a decision at odds with all we 
                  know about common practice at the time and it has a negative 
                  effect on the outcome. That is especially hard to understand 
                  as he always makes use of historical instruments. A performance 
                  with such large forces has little to do with historical performance 
                  practice, though. 
                    
                  Even so, this disc is well worth investigating because of the 
                  mass and motets by Stadlmayr. There are very few discs which 
                  pay attention to his oeuvre, and that makes this disc welcome, 
                  despite its shortcomings. 
                    
                  Johan van Veen 
                  http://www.musica-dei-donum.org 
                  https://twitter.com/johanvanveen