Sergei RACHMANINOFF (1873-1943)
Piano Concerto No.2 in C minor Op.18 (1900-01) [35:30]
Piano Concerto No.3 in D minor Op.30 (1909) [41:13]
Shura Cherkassky (piano)
Gothenburg Symphony Orchestra/Sergiu Comissiona
Gothenburg Symphony Orchestra/Sten Frykberg
rec. Gothenburg, live 9 February 1970 (No.2) and live 3 March 1968 (No.3)
CEMBAL D’AMOUR CD155 [76:44] 
Cherkassky never recorded Rachmaninov’s Second Piano Concerto so its survival
in this live 1970 broadcast is an important addition to the impish magician’s
discography. His Decca recording of the Third Concerto was made quite late
in the day, and has already been augmented by a much earlier 1957 broadcast
performance with the BBC Symphony and Rudolf Schwarz [BBC Legends BBCL4092]
where it was coupled with Prokofiev’s Second Concerto with Nagano. Nevertheless
this 1968 performance happily offers us another glimpse of his way with the
work.
Both concertos were taped in concert in Gothenburg. For the Second Concerto
he was joined by Sergiu Comissiona. Whether Cherkassky fits the bill as an
exponent of the C minor is a moot point. In the opening movement, sculpted
slowly and graphically, things come to paragraphal phrase ends and simply
stand stock still, - like a hiker forgetting his walk and admiring the chasm
below. This is decidedly peculiar, and prepares one for the caprice to come,
the phrases that are thrown away, the glittering treble runs, the moments
of pounding drama, the constant changes of dynamics, and the colouristic palette
served up by this inimitable musician. Similarly the syntax of the slow movement
is very different, as one might expect; personalised to a degree but powerfully
realised. The finale is taken, again, deliberately, and it’s very italicised
playing indeed, albeit there are some gorgeous moments of ‘music box’ sonority.
It’s very romantic, rhythmically disruptive, and rather draws attention to
itself at the end. It’s not surprising that co-ordination problems occur –
accompanying Cherkassky must have been like trying to catch sunlight – but
for all that, as one so often finds oneself saying of this musician, it’s
a once-heard and never-forgotten type of performance. It’s a shame about the
rather boxy recording and the crudely recorded percussion.
Two years earlier he had performed the Third Concerto with Sten Frykberg.
Again there are plenty of unconventional things in this performance – in terms
of tempo relations and phraseology and dynamics. He is never conventional
and seldom does the expected thing. The dropped notes are an irrelevance,
the finale’s increasingly galvanic aspect hard to ignore. Throughout, one’s
impression is the same as that generated by his performance of the C minor;
that the performances are those of a man breathing new and quixotic life into
both concertos.
Jonathan Woolf
Cherkassky breathing new and quixotic life into these concertos.