  | 
            | 
         
         
          |     
            
   
            
 alternatively 
              CD: MDT 
              AmazonUK 
              AmazonUS 
              Sound 
              Samples & Downloads   | 
            Dmitry SHOSTAKOVICH 
              (1906-1975)  
              Symphony No. 1 in F minor, Op. 10 (1924/5) [33:23]  
              Symphony No. 3 in E flat major, ‘The First of May’, Op. 20 (1929)* 
              [31:10]  
                
              Royal Liverpool Philharmonic Choir* and Orchestra/Vasily Petrenko 
               
              rec. 28-29 July and *22-23 June, 2010, Philharmonic Hall, Liverpool. 
              DDD  
              Transliterated Russian text and English translation included  
                
              NAXOS 8.572396 [64:33]   
           | 
         
         
          |  
            
           | 
         
         
           
             
               
                  
                   
                     
                  Shostakovich’s First Symphony is an amazingly precocious achievement. 
                  It’s much more than that: it’s also a work of genuine substance. 
                  Vasily Petrenko and the RLPO have impressed me greatly in the 
                  issues that I’ve heard to date from their Shostakovich symphony 
                  cycle and their account of the First is fully up to the standards 
                  so far set.  
                     
                  The first movement contains a good deal of laconic, pithy music 
                  and Petrenko and his team discharge these very well, with crisp 
                  articulate playing. I like the insouciant way the waltz-like 
                  passages are done. This is a movement of several moods and Petrenko 
                  conveys them successfully. He ensures that the nimble second 
                  movement is delivered with great energy and dynamism.  
                     
                  The slow movement takes the work onto a different and deeper 
                  level of expression. It’s launched by an eloquent, keening oboe 
                  solo that’s very well done here and the cello soloist who follows 
                  on is not to be outdone in terms of expressiveness. Petrenko 
                  gives the movement the full weight of emotional gravitas (one 
                  may marvel at the fervour of the eighteen-year old composer.) 
                  The playing of the RLPO is excellent, not least in the dynamic 
                  contrast they provide: there are several stretches of really 
                  hushed playing yet the climaxes, when they come, are towering. 
                  Overall, this is a highly convincing reading of the movement. 
                  The finale can seem episodic but Petrenko knits it all together 
                  expertly. The imposing passage (from 6:28 to the end) following 
                  the timpani solo is powerfully done. This is a very successful 
                  rendition of Shostakovich’s first and very impressive essay 
                  in symphonic form.  
                     
                  I’ve never been able to get to grips with the Third Symphony, 
                  which I first heard decades ago in Morton Gould’s RCA version 
                  on LP. In fact so incomprehensible did I find it that I admit 
                  that I gave up on the piece and I haven’t heard it for years, 
                  other than playing it through when I acquired Rudolf Barshai’s 
                  cycle. In the interim, however, I’ve come to have some understanding 
                  of – and a huge admiration for – the Fourth Symphony, which 
                  I believe is one of the composer’s most interesting and important 
                  works, though it’s a very challenging piece for the listener. 
                  Returning now to the Third in this recording, I suspect that 
                  my appetite for the Fourth may have helped me to an appreciation 
                  of its predecessor.  
                     
                  I’ve also been helped by Richard Whitehouse’s booklet note. 
                  Not only does he outline the background to the work very well 
                  but he’s also very good at describing the music and Naxos helpfully 
                  divide it up into six separate tracks so it’s very easy to follow 
                  Mr Whitehouse’s clear analysis. I was intrigued to learn that 
                  the composer declared that the symphony depicts “the festive 
                  spirit of peaceful construction.” I have to say I don’t really 
                  get that – but I may in time.  
                     
                  The opening, which features an extended, subdued duet for two 
                  clarinets as the introduction to the first movement proper, 
                  gives little hint of what’s to follow. When the main allegro 
                  is reached the pace and the tension of the music pick up appreciably. 
                  Truly, this is driven music – or at least it is in Petrenko’s 
                  hands - and one relishes the bristling, agile playing of the 
                  RLPO. I felt that some passages presage elements of the first 
                  movement of the Fourth Symphony. However, while Petrenko and 
                  his orchestra do their collective best for Shostakovich’s writing 
                  I have to confess that I don’t really discern any progress or 
                  development in the music. Perhaps that’s because I find it well-nigh 
                  impossible to detect – and cling on to – any significant thematic 
                  material. It’s probably there but, despite the clarity of the 
                  playing and the recording. I think Shostakovich has just buried 
                  it under a tumult of often dense scoring.  
                     
                  The slow second movement is easier to appreciate, I find – if 
                  not, perhaps, to love. The hushed, spare textures in the opening 
                  string-dominated paragraphs will surely expose any imprecision 
                  of tuning or ensemble but the RLPO acquit themselves extremely 
                  well. Indeed, the string section plays with great eloquence 
                  in this movement. The third movement, which I hesitate to label 
                  as a ‘scherzo’ since it seems anything but jocular, is fast 
                  and furious – and, to my ears, rather grim. The scoring is often 
                  strident and this is not an easy listen. The thunderous, aggressive 
                  climax reminds me very much of the comparable passage in the 
                  third movement of the Eighth Symphony, which lay some fourteen 
                  years in the future.  
                     
                  The finale is prefaced by a portentous and musically rather 
                  fragmentary introduction. Then Shostakovich deploys an SATB 
                  chorus to declaim a Revolutionary poem by one Semyon Kirsanov. 
                  Frankly, the words amount to little more than revolutionary 
                  tosh but one must make allowances for the oppressive political 
                  climate in which these people were living and working. The RLPO 
                  Choir is suitably fervent in its delivery but I can’t work up 
                  much enthusiasm – no, make that any enthusiasm - for 
                  this part of the work. Neither the music nor the words seem 
                  to have a great deal of connection with what we’ve heard up 
                  to this point and, as Richard Whitehouse very fairly says “there 
                  is little space for any emotional progression.” To be honest, 
                  this part of the work is banal and I was put in mind of part 
                  of the famous description of the Seventh Symphony lying on the 
                  last degree of platitude.  
                     
                  So, I can’t say that I’m still greatly convinced by the piece 
                  overall. However, Vasily Petrenko and the RLPO make the best 
                  possible case for this symphony, however flawed it may be, and 
                  one can see, fleetingly at least, where the Fourth Symphony 
                  has its roots. One may not like the Third Symphony but a recording 
                  such as this makes it plain that one cannot ignore or overlook 
                  it.  
                     
                  The recorded sound in both performances is very good. As I’ve 
                  already indicated, both pieces are very well played and they’re 
                  also nicely illuminated in the booklet note, which is extremely 
                  important in the case of the unfamiliar Third. This is another 
                  impressive instalment in Vasily Petrenko’s Shostakovich cycle. 
                   
                    
                 John Quinn  
                   
 
                   
                   
                   
                 
                
              	                                                  
                  
                  
                                                                                                                       
                  
                  
                  
                  
                
                 
                   
                 
                 
             
           | 
         
       
     
     |