The Max Brod Trio bring a welcome sense of clarity and focus 
                  to these well-known Dvorák chamber works. The structure of the 
                  Dumky is far from clear-cut, but the players make a convincing 
                  case for its unity. And there is also a sense of intimacy that 
                  pervades the recording, as you would hope to find in all chamber 
                  music, but rarely do. 
                  
                  Despite its enduring popularity, the Dumky Trio poses a range 
                  of interpretive challenges to performers. Rather than structure 
                  the work as a traditional four-movement trio, Dvorák instead 
                  gives us a sequence of movements, each in the form of a dumka 
                  dance, that is a slow introduction followed by an allegro conclusion. 
                  The structure of each individual movement relies on the transition 
                  from slow to fast, which Dvorák achieves in a different way 
                  in each movement. In each case, he is relying on a sense of 
                  surprise, and it is up to the performers to deliver that without 
                  relying on undue exaggeration. Nothing comes as a surprise to 
                  the players, and there is occasionally a feeling that the meticulous 
                  preparation they have put in has damped the spontaneity of these 
                  (supposedly) folk dances. 
                  
                  The sheer sophistication of this reading is the one aspect of 
                  it that may turn listeners off. Dvorák has taken the Ukrainian 
                  dance form - which according to the liner he first learnt of 
                  from Janáček - and transformed it for a concert hall setting. 
                  The players take that chamber music context for granted and 
                  make no effort to recapture the music's folk origins. That isn't 
                  necessarily a problem, but to me some of the charm is lost, 
                  and without those folk inflections the music risks sounding 
                  like second-rate Brahms. 
                  
                  The slow introductions are also more restrained than you will 
                  find in most recordings. Where many performers use the following 
                  allegro as an excuse for indulgence in each of the preceding 
                  adagios, the Max Brod Trio keep a fairly even tempo throughout, 
                  with only very controlled rubato and a sense of direction that 
                  keeps the music flowing. That allows the overall work to make 
                  more structural sense, but sometimes the slow sections seem 
                  in need of a little more space. 
                  
                  Curiously, the Max Brod Trio recorded this work only four years 
                  previously. That was for a different label (Arcodiva UP 0098 
                  - 2 131) and both the violin and cello parts were taken by different 
                  players (see footnote). Perhaps the work makes regular appearances 
                  on their concert programmes, or perhaps it just sells well. 
                  To me, though, this isn't an ideal performance, it is a convincing 
                  foil against the many, many over-indulgent readings on the market, 
                  but only works on its own terms thanks to the high technical 
                  standards of the playing and recording. 
                  
                  I'm always curious about how MDG achieve their impressive results, 
                  given their avoidance of post-production manipulation. The quality 
                  of the performers they work with must be part of the answer. 
                  But whatever they do to achieve it, the sound is always good. 
                  I'm particularly impressed with the balance here, and the way 
                  that the cello provides a focused bass sound without ever overpowering. 
                  In fact, the cello playing from Maximilian von Pfeil, is a real 
                  asset for this ensemble. It is elegant and emotive, but without 
                  ever being overstated. Chamber performance at its best. 
                  
                  The Op.65 Trio suits this ensemble's approach better, I think, 
                  than the Dumky. It has a more traditional form and a more involved 
                  dramatic architecture that works with rather than against their 
                  sophisticated interpretive approach. I love the way that they 
                  land running at the start of the work, fully engaging the listener 
                  from the very first note. And the quiet interludes here really 
                  benefit from the players' continuing awareness of the structural 
                  logic, a marked contrast to the rushed feeling that it gives 
                  to the Dumky adagios. Despite not being as famous, the Op.65 
                  is a more coherent and logical work than the Dumky. It also 
                  provides a much better vehicle for the Max Brod Trio's considerable 
                  talents. 
                  
                  Gavin Dixon
                
                Thanks for running Gavin Dixon's review of the Max Brod Trio 
                  [http://www.musicweb-international.com/classrev/2011/June11/Dvorak_70316822.htm], 
                  but he is mistaken when he writes "...both the violin and 
                  cello parts were taken by different players" on their earlier 
                  recording of Dumky [http://www.musicweb-international.com/classrev/2011/June11/Dvorak_70316822.htm]. 
                  
                  In fact, it is only the cellist who changed! Petr Mateják 
                  is the violinist on both recordings.
                  Sincerely,
                  Jeff Dimmerman
                  Raymond Weiss Artist Mgmt. Inc.