The blurb for this CD claims that Argentinean composer Alberto 
                  Ginastera "was one of the most admired and respected musical 
                  voices of the twentieth century" - if only! There are still 
                  too many music-lovers who will know him at best by his 1941 
                  ballet Estancia - more likely just the final dance - 
                  or perhaps his Harp Concerto or the orchestral Pampeana no.3, 
                  so little exposure does his music get in the concert hall or 
                  on the radio. On the other hand, having taken an avant-garde 
                  turn in the 1950s, the nationalist Ginastera of Estancia 
                  is hardly recognisable as the composer of these cello concertos. 
                  The South-American folk instruments and dance rhythms can still 
                  be heard, but now making use of the experimental language of 
                  serialism, aleatory methods and microtonality. 
                  
                  The twelve-tone row and quarter tone appear in the three-movement 
                  Cello Concerto no.1, yet so does the B-A-C-H motif, as if Ginastera 
                  were nonetheless asserting a strong sense of continuity with 
                  the past. The work begins with some extraordinarily deep rumblings 
                  from the orchestra, setting the tone for a movement - indeed 
                  a whole concerto - dense with cryptic, frequently sinister-sounding 
                  sonorities. This is a mainly slow-moving, brooding, almost ponderous 
                  work - in places the music comes to a complete halt, as if the 
                  orchestra was considering its next move - except for a sudden 
                  eruption into an almost moto perpetuo frenzy at the start 
                  of the second movement, marked Presto sfumato, and again 
                  by way of reprise - sounding initially like a battery of digeridoos! 
                  - after a reflective Trio notturnale. 
                  
                  Whether fast or slow, the cello part is extremely virtuosic, 
                  often pushed up against its uppermost register. The orchestral 
                  scoring is relatively light, sometimes exotic, but always dark, 
                  ranging from the eerie to the downright violent. The first part 
                  of the amazing final movement is like a percussive assault on 
                  a cello that is trying to think clearly or stay rational. The 
                  cello manages to cling to sanity for the mysterious, virtually 
                  mystical end where, for more than a minute, it sustains the 
                  same very high note, with the odd dramatic comment from the 
                  orchestra, before finally vanishing. 
                  
                  Mark Kosower, outstanding principal cellist of the Cleveland 
                  Orchestra, dedicates this recording to Ginastera's wife, Aurora 
                  Nátola, who died aged 85 shortly before the recording took place. 
                  Nátola was by all accounts an excellent cellist, and in her 
                  heyday appeared as a guest soloist with the Bamberg Symphony. 
                  Kosower writes that without her "encouragement and support" 
                  the recording would not have happened. In fact, her involvement 
                  goes far deeper, because in 1977 Ginastera actually revised 
                  the score of the First Cello Concerto for Nátola, whom he married 
                  in 1971, having left his first wife in 1969, the year following 
                  his original completion of the Concerto. Nátola gave the premiere 
                  in 1978. The back inlay gives the date of the First Concerto 
                  simply as 1968, but presumably this recording is of the revised 
                  version. 
                  
                  Ginastera then wrote the four-movement Second Cello Concerto 
                  for Nátola in 1980 in celebration of their tenth year together, 
                  incorporating a 'dawn' theme for 'Aurora'; it comes as no surprise 
                  that it is a lighter work than the First. About it Ginastera 
                  said: "the unifying element throughout the first movement 
                  is a famous cello theme by a great composer, whose identity 
                  should be discovered by the listener" - this is the cello 
                  solo from the third movement of Brahms's Second Piano Concerto 
                  - "that the Scherzo sfuggevole must be performed 
                  within the strictest pianissimo" - this is superbly observed 
                  by the orchestra and soloist - "that in the third movement 
                  one hears the coquí, that minute and musical nocturnal creature 
                  [tree frog] from Puerto Rico; and that in the last movement 
                  appear the Quechuan rhythms of the karnavalito, of Inca origin." 
                  
                  
                  Nonetheless this Concerto is by no means easy listening, and 
                  in several ways has much in common with the First, not only 
                  the fact that it is almost identical in length. Both works require 
                  great virtuosity of the cellist; both are brilliantly orchestrated, 
                  exploiting a huge palette of tonal colour; both are more slow 
                  than fast, more piano than forte. Like the First, the Second 
                  has a superb finale, a poetic Cadenza that gives way to the 
                  life-affirming and boisterous 'karnavalito'. 
                  
                  The Second Concerto is a live recording, but, aside from what 
                  Ginastera provides in the scores, there is little 'atmosphere' 
                  as such: extraneous noises have been all but eliminated and 
                  there is very little difference in sound quality between the 
                  two - in both cases it is very good. The hall itself is shown 
                  in a colour photo in the booklet, which has excellent notes 
                  on Ginastera and these works by Susan Wingrove. 
                  
                  This is a marvellous team performance from cellist, conductor 
                  and orchestra alike, making a compelling case for Ginastera's 
                  concertos. The Government must act now to make these compulsory 
                  components of the repertoire. 
                  
                  Byzantion 
                    
                  Collected reviews and contact at reviews.gramma.co.uk
                  
                  see also review by Nick 
                  Barnard