The members of the Martinů Quartet studied at the Prague 
                  Conservatory with Viktor Moucka of the Vlach Quartet. They founded 
                  the quartet in 1976, and, with the blessing of the Martinů 
                  Society, took that composer's name in 1985, since which time 
                  they have been active proponents of Martinů's chamber music. 
                  
                    
                  While the present program doesn't feature that composer, these 
                  Dvorák performances once again exemplify the seemingly intuitive 
                  understanding of phrasing that's peculiar to native and Czech-trained 
                  musicians, and apparently beyond the reach of even the most 
                  astute, polished foreign practitioners. It's been said that 
                  the melodic and rhythmic patterns of Czech music, particularly 
                  Dvorák's, reflect the inflections and rhythms of the Czech language. 
                  This may well be so, but I suspect that even those with little 
                  or no knowledge of Czech will recognize a natural ease in the 
                  phrasing here that suggests a "spoken" immediacy. 
                  
                    
                  The Martinů members, and their fellow-travelers, constitute 
                  an exceptionally unified, impeccably balanced ensemble, top-to-bottom. 
                  They play these scores with a taut, full-throated intensity 
                  characteristic of Slavic string players, digging into the tremolo-like 
                  figures of the quintet's first movement, soaking the opening 
                  chorale of its Larghetto in vibrant tone. Yet their alert 
                  rhythmic address - note the delicacy and point of the dotted 
                  rhythms in the quintet's finale - keep the sound from becoming 
                  heavy and earthbound, as can happen in second- and third-tier 
                  Czech orchestras; the music always moves firmly towards important 
                  points of arrival. Both performances convey a satisfying sense 
                  of rigorous, "symphonic" drama. 
                    
                  There's no denying, however, that the players' frequently robust 
                  manner militates against the more mysterious, ambivalent colors 
                  of these scores. In the quintet's Allegro vivo, the Trio 
                  isn't eerie, but prosaic. Their approach doesn't always allow 
                  for affection, playfulness, and good old-fashioned charm. The 
                  quintet's opening movement does unfold easily and naturally, 
                  and the players find room for warmth in the earlier sextet. 
                  But, given the fetching way they lighten the textures at 7:05 
                  in the opening Allegro moderato, for example, you'd expect 
                  them to seek out a similar variety in the theme-and-variations 
                  finale. As it goes here, a sense of sameness ultimately prevails. 
                  
                    
                  Subtler, but possibly more compromising, is the occasional absence 
                  of repose - in Dvorák, exemplified by, but not limited to, the 
                  characteristic plagal ("A--men") cadences and harmonies. 
                  It's not that the players are unaware of this aspect of the 
                  style; in the quintet, the easy assurance with which they "settle" 
                  into the first movement's turn to major at 0:56 shows that. 
                  But, in the Sextet, after a healthy Furiant, the Trio 
                  section, which sings nicely, would blossom with a measure of 
                  greater breadth. Similarly, the coda of the Quintet's first 
                  movement nods at the right sort of relaxation without actually 
                  quite achieving it. 
                    
                  So these aren't quite ideal realizations of these scores. Still, 
                  the Martinů's sins are basically those of omission, rather 
                  than of commission. This is a young ensemble; they have time 
                  to grow into the fullness of the Dvorák style. Meanwhile, their 
                  performances are already appealing, and quite powerful. 
                    
                  What should be a track listing is confusing - the movements 
                  of each work are numbered "1" through "4" 
                  - and incorporates careless misprints ("allegro gusto," 
                  "quasi adantino"). The sound quality, however, 
                  is vivid and present. 
                    
                
Stephen Francis Vasta