|
|
alternatively
CD: MDT
AmazonUK
AmazonUS
Sound
Samples & Downloads |
Pierre RODE (1774-1830)
Violin Concerto No. 3 in G minor, Op. 5 [28:07]
Violin Concerto No. 4 in A major, Op. 63 [23:07]
Violin Concerto No. 6 in B flat, Op. 8 [22:37]
Friedemann Eichhorn (violin)
Jena Philharmonic Orchestra/Nicolás Pasquet
rec. 25-29 May 2009, Volkshaus, Jena, Germany
NAXOS 8.570767 [73:51]
|
|
Pierre Rode was born four years after Beethoven and died three
years after Beethoven. He couldn’t have been more different,
though; as a member of the ‘French school’ of violin playing
he toured Europe with a series of successful concertos, each
of them highly lyrical and virtuosic. They’re classical or early-romantic
in a vague way: you could never say, “ah! This must be Rode!”,
but on the other hand any fan of the period who listens to Rode’s
music won’t turn it off. It is reliably pretty, well-made, and
enjoyable, and the feature I really need to point out is that
Rode wrote absolutely first-rate finales with rhythmic verve
and even what sound like folk elements.
The Third Concerto (1798) is one of the most ambitious in his
whole series, with a fifteen-minute long first movement; the
other two movements are just thirteen combined. This gigantic
allegro is rather too gigantic; it never feels big or important,
but just keeps going. The rest of the piece is much more successful,
especially the riveting finale, which if I didn’t know better
I would tell you is some kind of polonaise or other east-European
dance.
The Fourth Concerto (1798-1800, date uncertain) has all the
advantages of the Third except for minor-key spice, and adds
admirable brevity to the mix. It, too, is a pleasure for the
ears. The Sixth Concerto (1800), apparently Rode’s most famous
although all three of these recordings are premieres, presents
his art at its most refined: lovely tunes, beautiful solo writing,
a slightly beefier orchestral contribution - does the Fourth
Concerto use trombones or are my ears deceiving me? - and another
final rondo really worth getting excited about. It seems to
me rare that Rode would produce merely average adagios and then
superb concluding movements; so often obscure romantic concertos
excel early and then disappoint in the finales.
Adding to the pleasure of the disc is the solo playing of Friedemann
Eichhorn, as polished and pleasing as the music; he really has
the feel of this era’s style. Even better, he’s written his
own highly accomplished cadenzas for each concerto, very good
in the first two concertos and then in No. 6 providing quite
possibly the highlight of the whole disc: Eichhorn has brought
in one of the variations from Bach’s Chaconne in D minor and
incorporated into the heart of the solo, and the result is a
really well-written synthesis of the original Bach and the Rode
themes which never feels like a stylistic clash. We’re fortunate
to have such a thoughtful performer engaging so closely with
the composer and his style, and the Jena Philharmonic under
Nicolás Pasquet provide admirable support.
A note: if you insert the CD into your computer, the Gracenote
track-identification software will report the wrong opus number
for No. 4 (Op. 18 instead of Op. 16) and the wrong key for No.
6 (it’s in B flat, not B). Chai Ben-Shan’s paintings on the
covers of the Naxos Rode series all look like completely different
people, the two previous portraits looking much more dashing
than this one. Don’t let appearances fool you: Pierre Rode’s
music is a pleasure to be with.
Brian Reinhart
|
|