Although it is not the first work that can be described as an
opera, Orfeo is certainly the earliest that survives
in the normal repertoire of most opera houses. The first performances
took place in 1607 in the Palazzo Ducale in Mantua where the
composer was a court musician to the Gonzagas. There were subsequent
performances elsewhere in Italy. Orfeo was published
in two separate editions in Venice in 1609 and 1615. This early
success was not maintained, and the work was virtually forgotten
in the nineteenth century. The twentieth century saw a revival
of interest, starting with a performance under Vincent d’Indy
in 1904. Subsequent editions and performances followed, including
editions by Orff and Respighi and many more modern and scholarly
versions seeking to get closer to what the composer intended.
The first recording was in 1942, followed swiftly by versions
under Helmut Koch in 1951 and August Wenzinger in 1955. Hindemith’s
interest in the work was therefore part of a more general movement
rather than something unique. These discs therefore present
a snapshot of an approach as to how the opera was performed
half a century ago. This might have been more interesting if
space had been found for extracts from other recordings from
this general period for the purpose of comparison – an opportunity
missed.
Listening to any of the many more modern recordings of the work
it would be easy to forget the century of investigation, trial
and error which has led to the kind of results we now tend to
take almost for granted. It is salutary to listen to this, or
indeed to any of the early recordings, and realise just what
a debt is owed to the work of previous scholars and performers.
This is not always accepted by those most directly involved.
I recall correspondence in the Musical Times many years
ago between Hans Redlich and Denis Stevens about their respective
editions of the Vespers. A third party wrote a brief
letter suggesting that the former should acknowledge that scholarship
moves onward, and the latter that his efforts relied in part
on the work of earlier scholars. For his pains they joined forces
and attacked him viciously instead of each other. Passions run
high in the field of Monteverdi scholarship.
The performance on these discs is introduced by Hindemith in
a short talk, but I regret that my German is inadequate to follow
either that or the two lengthy articles given only in German
in the booklet. I regret that I can therefore report only on
what I hear on the discs. As you will have gathered, this is
very different from more modern recordings. Although some period
instruments are used, this is not universal, and the organ in
particular has a very curious sound, more like a piano accordion
or harmonium. Scoring for the dances is less pungent than we
are used to now, and chords for wind instruments are occasionally
introduced into passages of recitative. The singing of the soloists
varies, some wholly at sea with Monteverdi’s harmonic phrasing
and most using more vibrato than we are accustomed to
today in this music. Ornamentation is virtually entirely absent
with the single exception of Orfeo’s long plea to Charonte,
Possente spirito. Here Sinimberghi makes a gallant and
by no means wholly unsuccessful attempt at its difficulties.
He may have a voice and manner more obviously suited to later
Italian composers but his evident sincerity and ease with the
language are real virtues. Possente spirito is, as it
should be, a high point of the performance as a whole. Low points
come from moments, sometimes quite long moments, of uncertain
intonation from other singers, mainly female, and from the very
poor chorus. The instrumentalists are better with much real
rhythmic energy when called for. All in all though, despite
occasional moments of real eloquence, too much of this performance
sounds as though all of those concerned are still feeling their
way in the idiom.
The three short items by Gabrieli which precede the opera are
poorly performed, especially by the choir. As I have indicated,
the booklet contains long articles in German and, somewhat oddly,
a transcript of the Wikipedia article on the opera. I found
listening to the discs an interesting rather than an entertaining
experience, and I find it difficult to imagine when I might
want to return to them. I listened to them dutifully but it
is hard to greet their issue with more than a very muted enthusiasm.
John Sheppard
See also review by Jonathan
Woolf