Louis Demetrius Alvanis is doing sterling work for the Meridian 
                  label, and has numerous releases to his name. The Chopin solo 
                  piano sonatas are frequently coupled with other flotsam rather 
                  than gathered together on one disc, and with the less frequently 
                  recorded Sonata No.1 this is a useful programme. 
                    
                  Meridian have ‘A Natural Sound Recording’ approach and marketing 
                  hook, but the recording of this disc is one hurdle some listeners 
                  will have to leap before considering purchase. I searched high 
                  and low, but other than mention of the Steinway name, I could 
                  gain no clues from the disc packaging as to where this recording 
                  was made. The piano sound is very good, and from my own point 
                  of view I have few complaints, but it has to be said that the 
                  acoustic here is somewhat swimmy. The effect of this varies 
                  – I found it rather hard to live with on the car stereo, less 
                  disturbing over headphones. If you live in a palatial space 
                  with marble floors the combined echoes may make this less than 
                  favourable, but as a ‘concert hall’ kind of recording it can 
                  be quite exhilarating. You’ll need to make up your own mind, 
                  but have a listen first if you can. 
                    
                  The best known Chopin sonatas are numbers 2 and 3, and my reference 
                  here is Evgeny 
                  Kissin on RCA. His playing is by no means all things to 
                  all people, but if you want a passionately expressed view by 
                  which to compare others then his is pretty emphatic. The Sonata 
                  No.2 opens with one of those highly dramatic statements, 
                  and there’s plenty of ‘symphonic’ piano writing to get your 
                  teeth into. Alvanis’ contrast between this and the beautifully 
                  lyrical second section isn’t quite as wide as with Kissin, but 
                  everything is nicely phrased and punchy enough. Where Kissin 
                  is stronger is in his sense of a kind of vocal narrative – expressing 
                  the sheer melodrama in the music. The remarkable modulations 
                  later on in the movement are more muddled and less immediate 
                  with Alvanis, still with plenty of power and texture, but with 
                  less ‘wow’ factor leaping from the composer’s imagination as 
                  much as from the piano. This dramatic flavour is taken further 
                  in the Scherzo, which again has plenty of weight and 
                  contrast from Alvanis, but with Kissin’s wider dynamics the 
                  music reaches further beyond the salon walls, at times approaching 
                  a kind of cinematic mad genius feel. Alvanis’ warmth of lyricism 
                  later on is highly atmospheric, more nostalgic than extrovert 
                  and the more appealing for that. The famous Marche Funèbre 
                  is one of those movements which can run the risk of becoming 
                  too over-laden with symbolic feeling, and Alvanis gets the balance 
                  right in my view, moving the pace along and not stopping to 
                  pick grief-blackened lilies on the way. Kissin has a tendency 
                  to explode in gestures of Greek tragedy which can have its own 
                  power, but wears a little heavy after a few hearings. The wonderful 
                  central melody can be seen as a kind of ecstatic arrival in 
                  heaven, as with Kissin, or a consoling embrace from a close 
                  friend or family member, as with Alvanis. The remarkable Finale 
                  is done by both pianists in almost exactly 1:30, Alvanis 
                  almost secretive with those runs, Kissin pedalling them into 
                  a Turneresque storm scene. 
                    
                  The Sonata No.3 is thematically more coherent as a piece, 
                  and as Alvanis point out in his well written notes, a product 
                  of his most mature style. His melodic expression is beautifully 
                  turned, with nicely proportioned rubato and a fine sense of 
                  poise and colour in both the upper voice and accompaniments. 
                  Kissin’s recording wins in clarity, which makes a difference 
                  in some of those remarkable pedalling effects in the first minute, 
                  after the opening theme statement. This extended movement is 
                  like a vast ornate carpet of recurring patterns and an amazing 
                  variety of shapes and forms. Kissin has a tendency to milk some 
                  of these for all they’re worth, virtually stopping at times. 
                  Alvanis has a greater sense of continuity and connectedness, 
                  his more constant forward momentum allowing time for reflection, 
                  but without bringing us to disorientating red traffic lights 
                  and difficult junctions. Another one of those finger-busting 
                  etude-like gestures, the opening of the Scherzo is one 
                  of those moments all good pianists must relish. Alvanis’ technique 
                  is well up to all this, and I also prefer his more sober presentation 
                  of the second section, another moment where Kissin has a tendency 
                  to muse and wander. Sensitive to the relationship the Largo 
                  movement has to Chopin’s friend Vincenzo Bellini, Alvanis 
                  is beautifully lyrical, and more believably singable than Kissin’s 
                  more pianistic line. This is hard to define, but at a basic 
                  level Alvanis plays the melody more softly, integrating it more 
                  effectively with the warm bed of harmonies which accompany. 
                  The section about 3.00 in is also quite magical; unlike Kissin, 
                  Alvanis avoiding pointing out melodic notes which aren’t really 
                  there. The Finale is another grand statement which has 
                  both plenty of pianistic fireworks and compositional marvels 
                  to offer, and I have no complaints about Alvanis here. He avoids 
                  making the more banal ‘rumpty-pumpty’ moments sound crass and 
                  is pretty convincing throughout. Kissin and Alvanis differ a 
                  little in tempi, the former shaving about 20 seconds from Alvanis’ 
                  time, the latter however not sounding at all relaxed and building 
                  a fair amount of excitement, the only marginal problems being 
                  a piano which sounds as if re-tuning in the mid-upper range 
                  was on the cards by this stage, and the rather milky acoustic, 
                  which the sheer amount of notes does penetrate, but sometimes 
                  requires a little ‘through’ listening. 
                    
                  Not to short-change the Sonata No.1, but while this student 
                  work has plenty of fine features it is somewhat dwarfed by the 
                  other two pieces. It serves as a nice warm-up to the other sonatas, 
                  and allows the ear to become accustomed to the sonic picture. 
                  Alvanis is sensitive to the kaleidoscope of influences Chopin 
                  was absorbing into his compositional work in this period, and 
                  his clear talent and facility for writing for his own instrument 
                  comes through with no holds barred. Funnily enough, it is only 
                  in the presto Finale of this sonata that I had the feeling 
                  that Alvanis was being pushed in any technical sense – Chopin’s 
                  tough pianistic writing making maximum demands with very little 
                  let-up at high speed. 
                    
                  Despite the wealth of riches when it comes to resonance in the 
                  recording, this is a very fine Chopin disc and can hold its 
                  own amongst the best. The classic recordings of the two great 
                  sonatas by Martha Argerich and Maurizio Pollini, both on Deutsche 
                  Grammophon, still hold a pre-eminent place. These and Artur 
                  Rubinstein’s great 1960s RCA recording will always have a special 
                  place, and Vladimir Ashkenazy’s Decca disc of all three sonatas 
                  as the direct competition for this programme is also pretty 
                  hard to beat. Fans of this music who just can’t get enough will 
                  find a good deal to enjoy here, and even though it may not quite 
                  be that last word in Chopin’s three piano sonatas it is most 
                  certainly a worthwhile contribution. 
                    
                  Dominy Clements