There is no big announcement or list of planned releases documented 
                  here, but this is labelled as ‘Schumann: Chamber Music vol. 
                  1’, so we can hope for a nice juicy series from MDG to follow. 
                  
                  
                  Schumann’s violin sonatas are somewhat in the shadow of many 
                  of his other works, but they do have plenty of the characteristics 
                  which give his work its appeal and deserve plenty of recognition. 
                  The programme here begins with the Grand Sonata op.121, 
                  which Schumann was working on while negotiations for the publication 
                  of the Op.105 sonata were in progress. After Schumann’s death 
                  the work was tarred with the brush of prejudice, seen as the 
                  product of an increasingly diseased mind and too extreme to 
                  be anything other than a failure in performance. Listening today 
                  one can hear the striking sense of original thinking in this 
                  piece, which, while perhaps less thematically memorable, is 
                  certainly a match and a challenge for Brahms’ compositions in 
                  this genre. The first movement is nearly quarter of an hour 
                  of unrelenting intensity, with all of the rich pianistic writing 
                  which makes this piece a true duo and not merely a violin work 
                  with piano accompaniment. The central two movements are more 
                  compact, the Sehr lebhaft keeping up the demanding nature 
                  of the first movement with further dark harmonic brooding. The 
                  following Leise, einfach, lightens the mood a little 
                  as promised, with the pizzicato violin being stalked by a stealthy 
                  piano, an opening section which turns into a gorgeous set of 
                  variations. The final movement Bewegt is a dramatic but 
                  triumphant statement whose rondo form has a remarkable cumulative 
                  effect. 
                  
                  The Sonata Op.105 is closely related in terms of period 
                  to the Op.121 sonata, and has a similarly vital sense of intense 
                  inventiveness and emotional inventiveness. The mention of the 
                  piano before the violin in the title is no mistake, and not 
                  unique in this genre, following in a line traceable to Mozart 
                  and Beethoven. This equality of status between the instruments 
                  is a further crystallisation of those earlier examples, and 
                  Schumann’s contribution is rightly pointed out in Joachim Draheim’s 
                  booklet notes as a forerunner to the romantic heights of the 
                  later 19th century with the works from Brahms to 
                  César Franck and beyond. Thematic connections are present throughout 
                  the Op.105 sonata, but whether these come across subliminally 
                  or with intellectual directness the actual music is filled with 
                  charm, especially the Allegretto central movement, which 
                  is like a cinematic panning shot between various conversations. 
                  The final movement can be seen as a gesture in Bach’s direction, 
                  but also has plenty of dance-like energy to go with the imitative 
                  counterpoint. 
                  
                  To conclude there is the Sonata in A minor, which was 
                  originally a collaborative effort in which Schumann was joined 
                  by the younger Brahms and his protégé Albert Dietrich, resulting 
                  in the so-called ‘FAE–Sonata’. Dietrich was responsible for 
                  the first movement, Schumann for the Intermezzo and Finale, 
                  Brahms contributing the penultimate Scherzo. Schumann 
                  began replacing the other composer’s work, and while it is not 
                  entirely clear from the booklet notes this is now entirely Schumann’s 
                  own work. Hindsight and knowledge of this work’s history can 
                  lead one to blithely apply words such as ‘flawed’ or ‘uneven’, 
                  but even as Schumann’s powers waned his natural gift as a composer 
                  and personal individuality of style are still potent and present, 
                  wiping a myriad of lesser and entirely healthy composers off 
                  the board. 
                  
                  There is a deal of distinguished competition in this repertoire, 
                  though with a read of the review I am confident this recording 
                  with Ensemble Villa Musica is more attractive than that with 
                  Alberto 
                  Bologni and Giuseppe Bruno. Carolin 
                  Widmann and Dénes Várjon on ECM are perhaps more realistic 
                  competitors, though tastes with regard to recording perspective 
                  may influence the choice here. This MDG disc has a very nice 
                  balance, perhaps a little more piano relative to the violin 
                  might have been preferred, but then the risk is run of the recording 
                  becoming too heavy with the weight of notes coming from the 
                  piano part, so this is not really a criticism. Both Nicolas 
                  Chumachenco and Kalle Randalu play with superb musicality, showing 
                  plenty of light and shade, a deep sense of commitment and communication. 
                  The recording itself is clear and direct, without being too 
                  close, the relationship between instruments and acoustic is 
                  ideal. With Schumann, my feeling is always that the ‘bravura’ 
                  is in the essence of the music, and too much extra ladled on 
                  by the players – pianist in particular – is something which 
                  will render the bigger-boned movements too hectic. This is most 
                  certainly not the case here. I admire both performers’ sympathy 
                  with Schumann’s idiom. 
                  
                  Dominy Clements