Through his experience as both conductor and composer Mahler 
                  came to the conclusion that because the size of the orchestra 
                  had increased since Beethoven’s time, poor Beethoven needed 
                  help. He certainly did, exactly in the same way as I need a 
                  hole in my head. 
                  
                  Whilst Beethoven’s scoring may seem crude at times, he was writing 
                  for what he had to hand at the time of composition - his music 
                  was of his time. What we have come to understand, both through 
                  authentic performance and good performances of the text with 
                  contemporary orchestras, is that the music transcends its time. 
                  It exists - for it is, quite simply, great music, and music 
                  which enriches and feeds our souls. Beethoven is the guv’nor, 
                  as a friend of mine says, and he always will be. All he needs 
                  is our hearts and minds. 
                  
                  Over a century ago Mahler thought differently, believing that 
                  the crudeness of Beethoven needed help, and he should be escorted 
                  into the modern era, as the fin de siècle world then was. Thus 
                  Mahler inflates Beethoven’s orchestra to Mahlerian proportions. 
                  He makes it louder, and thus, ironically, cruder, and it becomes 
                  a more difficult composition. 
                  
                  In February last year I attended the London première of this 
                  version, conducted by Neeme Järvi, and although a good performance 
                  – well played – it proved to be a vulgar, noisy, crude and very 
                  unpleasant piece of work. In truth I wonder if Mahler really 
                  knew what he was doing. Change for the sake of change isn’t 
                  good. Change can only be worthwhile if the changes made are 
                  to the advantage of the original – for instance, although fun, 
                  Marcel Duchamp’s addition of a moustache and goatee to the Mona 
                  Lisa adds nothing to the original. 
                  
                  This recorded performance has several advantages over that live 
                  performance. Interestingly, Kristjan Järvi directs a performance 
                  of some classical sensibility. The hugeness of Mahler’s vision 
                  isn’t obvious and, indeed, you’d be hard pushed, at times, to 
                  know that this wasn’t the original score. As a performance of 
                  a piece of music, it’s good and solid, but whether Mahler or 
                  Beethoven, there are better versions of the Ninth – and there 
                  are over 200 recordings available! 
                  
                  Mahler’s orchestration is a curiosity only. It sheds no new 
                  light on the work and it doesn’t really do it any favours. In 
                  fact, if you’re going to record the Mahler version then it should 
                  be splendid in its gaudiness, which this performance most certainly 
                  isn’t. One for the very curious only I feel. 
                  
                  Bob Briggs