|
|
alternatively
CD: AmazonUK
AmazonUS
|
Anton REICHA
(1770 - 1836)
Woodwind Quintets - Volume 8
Quintet in A major Op.99 No.3 [36:23]
Quintet in D major Op.99 No.4 [37:23]
The
Westwood Wind Quintet
rec. Crystal Chamber Hall, Camas, Washington, 18-19; 22-23 September
2005
CRYSTAL RECORDS CD268 [73:55] |
|
If you are already seven volumes into this cycle one imagines
the purchase of the remaining discs is all but obligatory and
if you are not is this the disc to mark your entry into the
world of Reicha Wind Quintets? For me it was the latter scenario
and I have to admit that little here encourages me to delve
deeper.
The Prague-born Anton Reicha was an exact contemporary - and
friend - of Beethoven and wrote this series of 24 Woodwind Quintets
between 1810 and 1820. Perhaps the comparison is not wholly
fair but given that by 1810 Beethoven had completed his first
six symphonies, twenty six piano sonatas, eleven string quartets,
pretty much all of the violin sonatas and the five piano concertos,
you can see the contemporary musical environment against which
these pieces should be judged. Not that these Reicha quintets
lack for confidence - they are both big four movement works
each lasting more than thirty five minutes.
The Producer’s Note at the end of the liner notes says,
“Reicha’s stated aim with the quintets was to prove
that music for woodwind instruments could be the equal of string
music”. Quite why the repertoire of string chamber music
is so rich and that for wind so impoverished in comparison is
a simple given fact. Theories as to why this might be ultimately
come down to the reality that the four instruments in a string
quartet in particular provide an ideally satisfying tonal blend
for the listener while at the same time demanding real compositional
skill and understanding from the writer. The bald fact remains
that for all his efforts Reicha is not a great enough composer
to storm the barricades of the string quartet compositionally
with these quintets. Great play is made in the notes of his
use of harmonic, rhythmic and formal sleights but to my ear
these count for less than nothing if the actual material he
uses is as dull as it seems to be here. Nothing comes close
to the brilliance of the late Haydn String Quartets for example
- the last of which was written by 1803. Reicha seems to have
a few compositional tricks in his pocket which are repeated
in both quintets. The main one of these is to embellish with
ever-increasing complexity the simple melodies he writes. This
is not true variation form rather a showcase for the technical
attributes of the players. Given that the quintet Reicha wrote
for was an early 19th Century “all-stars”
ensemble perhaps this is not surprising. Additionally there
are many tempo and metre changes within movements all of which
reminds me more of Divertimenti or Wind Serenades rather than
true Quintets - at least in the sense the term would be used
to describe Haydn or Beethoven chamber works of similar scale.
Which leads onto the present recording. This is a well recorded
disc with as good a balance being achieved between five such
very different instruments as possible. The acoustic is natural
and warm. The fifteen pages of liner notes - only in English
- are interesting and informative. The excerpts from Reicha’s
autobiography make for entertaining reading - the term ‘bathing
in reflected glory’ springs to mind. Certainly he has
no qualms about mentioning his own achievements in the same
sentence as those of his more illustrious counterparts mentioned
earlier.
As can be implied from the fact this is Volume 8, the Westwood
Wind Quintet are clearly dedicated to presenting this series
of compositions to the public. I have not heard them before
and certainly from their biographies and the plaudits reprinted
in the booklet they appear to be a well regarded group. This
would seem to be their 50th anniversary year but
I have to say I was very disappointed by the playing as a whole.
We are spoilt these days by playing of almost uniformly technical
brilliance so it comes as something of a surprise to find some
of the players to be as compromised as here. I found the tone
of the quintet’s founder oboist Peter Christ to be particularly
ungrateful - harsh and uneven. Likewise the flautist John Barcellona
at times plays quite beautifully but elsewhere his technique
is sorely challenged by Reicha’s writing. Even the general
ensemble I found to be a little wayward, lacking total unanimity
in the placing of chords for example. Normally I would rather
not carp about such details but they occur in every movement.
Taking the first movement on the disc; the very first chord
does not speak as one; the flute/clarinet runs at 2:34 are not
together or even, at 6:50 the clarinet stumbles around the final
corner of the phrase; the solo oboe from 7:15 lacks grace tonally
and musically; the flute cadenza at 7:50 really should have
been retaken as should the same player’s passage at 8:20;
the clarinet flourish at 10:18 finishes fractionally before
the rest of the group and finally in this movement the oboe
struggles to keep up around 11:55. None of which would matter
in a live performance or if it were a single instance. I go
into such pedantic detail for one movement because there is
a compounding effect here that meant I was listening for the
next fluff.
Dynamic range is an ongoing issue for a woodwind quintet - the
horn will always have to underplay relative to the flute or
oboe but again I have to say that I felt most of this disc was
performed in a dynamically safe mid-range that after a while
is simply dull. Take the phrase and its echo at 3:40 of the
Finale of Op.99 No.3 - yes it’s a little
quieter but why not make that a really exciting pianissimo echo!
Likewise phrasing is at best predictable. This music needs real
musical personalities to take it by the scruff of its neck.
It is not profound music but in the right hands I could imagine
it bubbling along in an undemanding and inoffensive way. Along
the way there is good playing here, notably from the horn and
bassoon, but too little too late to salvage my overall impression
of this disc and the music it contains.
A final nail in the hammered-shut coffin lid; the producer’s
note also draws attention to the issue of the quintet using
“just” intonation. This is a way of dividing the
twelve semitones of the standard octave that differs from the
standard “equal” temperament which has been prevalent
for the last 200 years. Indeed, in the history of temperament
it was all but ubiquitous in Western music by the time these
quintets were written so I am not sure why the Westwood Wind
Quintet chooses to favour this. A fact that needs to be remembered
is that whilst a piece can be performed authentically it is
very hard for the average listener to listen authentically.
By that I mean that we have become so accustomed to equal temperament
tuning that another tuning no matter how well executed does
sound “out of tune”. Certainly there is not much
evidence of the “beautiful chords and harmonies”
the erstwhile producer alludes to here.
Disappointing performances of music that is less important than
the scale of the works would suggest.
Nick Barnard
Reviews of other volumes in this series
Comments received from Peter Christ - Crystal
Records
I normally would not respond to a critic’s review of any
of our CDs, since most comments are opinion and one really cannot
argue with opinion, but Nick Barnard’s review has so many
erroneous statements about facts that I feel I cannot ignore it.
The most unfortunate thing about Mr. Barnard’s review
is that it may discourage some music lovers from listening to
these wonderful Woodwind Quintets of Anton Reicha, thus losing
out on hearing one of the most creative and beautiful composers
of any era. If they give Reicha a chance, they will find music
that, to quote another critic, is “some of the finest
music ever penned. These pieces are symphonies in miniature..each
one a masterpiece.” (Ritter, Audiophile Audition) In
looking back over the other reviews of this Reicha series that
have appeared in Music Web, I am pleased that every other reviewer
gave the Reicha series high marks, so Barnard is at odds with
all of them.
I am sure that Mr. Barnard feels that by giving specific times
for perceived problems he will convince everyone that he has super
ears and has actually listened to the CD carefully and thus shows
that he must know what he is talking about (realizing that hardly
anyone will check his statements). Unfortunately some of his statements
are erroneous and this is provable; it is not just opinion. For
example, one particularly egregious error Barnard makes is regarding
2:34, where he claims the flute and clarinet are not together.
In fact, they are exactly together; if one cannot hear this, then
I suggest listening at half speed. Those runs are magical; the
flute takes over from the clarinet as one instrument. I suspect
that after Mr. Barnard made his first erroneous statement he was
actively trying to substantiate his position by “finding”
more, so he made them up as he went along. One wonders what musical
training he has, that he could be so incorrect in his listening.
Could his training match the cumulative 200+ years of intense
professional performance that the members of this quintet have?
Also, one has to wonder about the type of mentality that listens
to a piece of music by “listening for the next fluff”
(his words). If I were so inclined I could take any recording
on the market (ANY recording) and find “fluffs” -
things that are not together or slight imperfections on attacks.
But this is not a way to really listen and understand music.
Mr. Barnard has some strong opinions reflected in this review.
Since they are opinions they can’t be denied. However one
does have the feeling that he was so turned off by the audacity
of a composer to write something that might be compared to the
string quartets of Haydn, that Barnard could not listen to the
inherent qualities of the music, choosing instead to find anything
he could to denigrate it. In fact, Reicha never said that his
quintets were better than Haydn’s, Reicha actually had great
respect for Haydn and states so many times in his autobiography.
But this begs the issue: if one feels that Haydn quartets are
the epitomy of greatness, does that mean that no other composer
should ever try to write one? There go out the window all the
quartets of Beethoven, as well as so many great quartets written
since. Did music end with Haydn? That Mr. Barnard can say that
all Reicha had were a few compositional tricks which are repeated
in his quintets just shows how little Mr. Barnard really listened
to these quintets, which are full of inspired writing. Instead
of trying to find a misplaced note here and there in the performance
he should have listened to the entirety for the music’s
complexity and its warmth and vitality.
His opinion that the recording lacks excitement is especially
weird. In the 50 years that the Westwood Wind Quintet has performed,
the group’s excitement has been a quality that audiences
and reviewers have constantly praised and mentioned, and has never
before been questioned. This was recently emphasized by the editor
of The Double Reed (a professional journal of the International
Double Reed Society), who said in a recent printed review of this
Reicha series that “what I hear most in their performance
again and again is that their ensemble is wonderfully precise,
clear, and always exciting. Sure, the polish is there, but never
at the expense of excitement and exuberance. When they play, the
music truly comes alive!” Mr. Barnard apparently was
so turned off that Reicha did not sound like Haydn that he couldn’t
listen with clear ears.
Mr. Barnard’s comments on just intonation are just plain
ignorant. We did not pull just intonation out of the dust bins
of antiquity just to impress listeners with our erudite adherence
to original practices. In fact, almost all present day first-rate
instrumentalists of non-fixed pitch instruments use just intonation,
in varying degrees, to tune their chords, unless they are forced
to play a chord with a piano’s equal temperament. I base
this observation on my successful 55 years of performance as well
as on many conversations with other fine musicians and printed
articles. (A recent series of several articles in The Clarinet
Magazine, written by one of the foremost clarinetists in the world,
emphasizes the importance of playing with just intonation.) Just
intonation is not just “a way of dividing the twelve semitones
of the standard octave that differs from the standard ‘equal’
temperament” (Mr. Barnard’s words). It is the only
way of dividing the octave that meets the laws of physics and
reduces the beats that make chords untrue. Equal temperament is
a compromise and that it has been used on pianos for 200 years
does not make it any more accurate; it is just that people who
listen primarily to pianos have gotten used to this “out
of tune” feature of them. For verification of the compromises
that are inherent in equal temperament, talk to any good piano
tuner about what has to be done to the correct scale to make the
piano come out OK in all the octaves. That Mr. Barnard cannot
hear a true chord says more about him than about the performance.
That he objected to the tone quality of the group is opinion,
and is very much at odds with everything we continually hear from
the musicians we respect, audiences, and most reviewers. One wonders
what kind of equipment he listened to this on -- was it a car
radio, an iPod, or a laptop computer? I invite readers to enjoy
the full sound of the group on a decent sound system.
I firmly believe, as have most of the reviewers of this series,
that the Reicha woodwind quintets are very important and listenable
works They are masterpieces that can stand up against anybody
(even Haydn and Beethoven). I am sorry that Mr. Barnard's narrow
frame of reference does not allow him to listen outside his box
and hear this.
In book reviews, it is common practice for the publisher to
say something about the reviewer, so that the reader can decide
whether the reviewer has the right credentials to be doing a good
review. I wonder why this practice is not upheld for music reviewers.
Unless I just can’t find it, there does not seem to be anything
about Mr. Barnard’s background on the Music Web site.
In my 55 years of professional oboe playing, I (and the Westwood
Wind Quintet) fortunately have received many complimentary reviews
and only a few not as complimentary, but I have never encountered
a review as off-base as this one by Mr. Barnard. I have shown
it to several musicians and music lovers that I respect and the
general consensus is that he must be in another universe, his
review is so out of sync with what others are saying.
Comment from Nick Barnard
I applaud the passion and commitment Mr Christ has to the restoration
of Anton Reicha to the pantheon of the greats. Any series
of 12 or so discs like this is a major undertaking requiring a
great deal of work.
However, 3 Facts to consider:
1) Reicha wrote 37 String Quartets to his 24 Woodwind Quintets
- so perhaps even he considered the String Quartet to be
the superior form - no-where does Mr Christ challenge my question
as to why there are such riches in the string music world and
the wind music world is relatively impoverished (K.361 apart)
2) My issue with Temperament is that however well it is
presented to a modern audience we cannot hear
authentically. Hence "beauty" of sound is by definition
subjective - I happen not to like the sound Mr Christ makes, sure
that is a negatively subjective response but equally
valid. Remember, a 21st Century audience has NO perception
of key as it impacted on an 18th/early 19th Century audience
- see: www.wmich.edu/mus-theo/courses/keys.html also
refer to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_intonation#Practical_difficulties
for issues arising from the use of Just Temperament.
3) I have relistened to the now-infamous 2:34 and did just as
Mr Christ suggests using a free utility called Audacity - audacity.sourceforge.net
- this allows music to be slowed down without changing pitch.
My conclusion; the instruments do not play together at that point.
My intention was not to promote how carefully I listened
but instead to make it clear that this was a cumulative problem
that marred my pleasure in listening to the disc.
This correspondence is now closed
|
|