Howard Goodall has built up quite a reputation in recent years 
                not least in writing theme music for several British television 
                series. Not only is he a composer but also he is an effective 
                and enthusiastic broadcaster about music, to whom television seems 
                to come as a natural milieu.
                
His new Requiem 
                  has a slightly unusual genesis for a choral work. It was commissioned 
                  by London Musici to celebrate their twentieth anniversary. The 
                  commission was for a choral-orchestral-dance piece for that 
                  orchestra, for the Christ Church Cathedral Choir and for the 
                  Rambert Dance Company. The Rambert is presenting the work on 
                  tour in several UK venues at the time of writing this review 
                  (November 2008).
                
In his booklet note 
                  the composer writes that in writing the work he has taken “what 
                  you might call a Brahmsian route.” By this he means that he 
                  has followed the example of Brahms in Ein deutsches Requiem, 
                  attempting to “provide solace to the grieving who live on, rather 
                  than dire warnings of damnation, or pleas for the departed as 
                  they linger in purgatory”. Goodall sets a mixed text in which 
                  elements of the traditional Christian funeral rites, in Latin, 
                  sit alongside various suitable poems as well as some verses 
                  from the Book of Revelation.
                
I have no doubt 
                  that Eternal Light will become very popular among performers 
                  and audiences alike for it is tuneful and accessible. Whether 
                  it will stand the test of time is another matter. I’ve just 
                  finished taking part in a run of performances of John Rutter’s 
                  Requiem, a piece in which I’ve sung several times before, 
                  and I’m convinced more than ever that Rutter’s work will stand 
                  that test for it combines memorable melodies, felicitous harmonies 
                  and skilful vocal and orchestral writing. After listening to 
                  Goodall’s piece several times I’m not convinced it’s successful 
                  on all those fronts.
                
The vocal writing, 
                  both for choir and soloists, is generally effective. Some of 
                  the melodies are quite memorable – I think, particularly, of 
                  the soprano solo, ‘Close thine eyes and rest secure’ in the 
                  first movement; of the tune for Newman’s celebrated hymn ‘Lead 
                  kindly light’, which is the fourth movement; and the fine baritone 
                  solo ‘Do not stand at my grave and weep’ (movement five). The 
                  soprano solo ‘Drop, drop, slow tears’ is also noteworthy. But 
                  sometimes Goodall’s melodic invention is less inspired. The 
                  third movement, ‘Belief’ sets a poem by Ann Thorp. The words 
                  look fine on the printed page. Unfortunately, Goodall provides 
                  a repetitive melody, which invests the whole movement with maudlin 
                  sentimentality. Tenor Alfie Boe does his best with it, but for 
                  me this is pretty thin stuff.
                
Happily Boe, who 
                  is truly excellent throughout, gets some better material elsewhere, 
                  not least in the ‘Agnus Dei’ and, earlier, in his contribution 
                  to the fifth movement, ‘In Flanders fields’.
                
A weakness of the 
                  work, I think, lies in the accompaniment. The scoring is light, 
                  consisting of a small string band (6, 4, 4, 4, 2 in this performance), 
                  harp, piano, piano/organ, and keyboard (played here by the composer). 
                  In several movements I’m afraid the accompaniment is just that 
                  – there’s little independent contribution to the musical argument 
                  by the players – and repeated listening drew me to the conclusion 
                  that the more memorable music came in those movements where 
                  not only is the melodic invention at its best but also the accompaniment 
                  is most interesting; in my view the strongest movements are 
                  numbers five, six, seven, nine and ten. I suppose the somewhat 
                  restricted style of the accompaniment is deliberate but it did 
                  seem to me to be a bit odd when an orchestra has commissioned 
                  the piece. One wonders if the addition of, say, a few woodwinds 
                  might have made the instrumental textures a bit more interesting, 
                  although perhaps the forces were determined by the composition 
                  of London Musici.
                
Though the music 
                  is somewhat uneven the same can’t be said of the performance 
                  itself for Stephen Darlington leads a committed and fine reading. 
                  The choir sings very well indeed and even if the instrumental 
                  contribution is too limited for my taste, the players do well. 
                  There’s also a strong line-up of soloists. I’ve already mentioned 
                  the excellence of Alfie Boe. Christopher Maltman is equally 
                  distinguished, singing with focused, rich tone and real eloquence. 
                  I’m not quite so persuaded by Natasha Marsh. I like very much 
                  the warm, round sound that she makes but for me the problem 
                  lies in her articulation of the words. In trying for expressiveness 
                  she often sounds too emotive and that spoils an otherwise good 
                  performance.
                
Whatever my reservations 
                  about the quality of the music Goodall builds to a convincing 
                  conclusion. The penultimate movement, ‘Agnus Dei’, for tenor 
                  and chorus is gently impassioned. Just as convincing is the 
                  last movement, ‘In Paradisum’, which involves the whole ensemble 
                  and in which Goodall draws the work together by reprising music 
                  from several of the preceding sections. There’s a moving climax 
                  at the words “Recordare, Jesu pie”, crowned by the solo soprano, 
                  before the tenor soloist leads a restatement of ‘Lead, kindly 
                  light’. Then the work comes to a peaceful, rather pensive close.
                
Three short pieces 
                  complete the disc. The setting of Psalm 23 has achieved celebrity 
                  as the theme music for the BBC television comedy series The 
                  Vicar of Dibley. Goodall has provided a new tune for Charles 
                  Wesley’s celebrated hymn, ‘Love divine, all loves excelling’. 
                  This new melody may not quite match Blaenwern, the great 
                  Welsh tune to which the hymn is often sung, but I find it’s 
                  one of those tunes that lodges firmly in the memory.
                
              
I’m sorry that I have 
                reservations about Eternal Light. It has some fine moments 
                and some that are genuinely moving. Perhaps my reservations will 
                be stilled when the choir to which I belong performs the piece 
                next year and I have the chance to learn it from the inside. As 
                I said earlier, I have no doubt it will achieve great popularity 
                and this recording will undoubtedly help in that process since 
                it’s hard to imagine it better done.
                
                John Quinn
              
                Postscript
              
When my review of Eternal Light was published at the very start 
                of 2009 I made the following comment: "Perhaps my reservations 
                will be stilled when the choir to which I belong performs the 
                piece next year and I have the chance to learn it from the inside." 
                Well, I've just taken part in a couple of performances, preceded 
                by several weeks of rehearsals. During that time I've also listened 
                several more times to the CD. My largely favourable view of the 
                recorded performance hasn't changed but how do I feel now about 
                the work itself?
              Some reservations remain. Above all, the accompaniment still 
                seems desperately plain, prosaic even, and I don't think it adds 
                to the musical argument at all. I still find the third movement 
                maudlin. I've also slightly modified my view of the choral writing, 
                portions of which I don't think now are actually all that well 
                written for voices: some of the writing in all parts lies uncomfortably 
                low. 
              However, my overall view of the work as a piece of music has 
                become much more positive. It has a cumulative impact, I find, 
                especially from the fourth movement onwards. The sixth movement, 
                in which the poem 'In Flanders Fields' is combined with phrases 
                from the Dies Irae is powerfully effective. By contrast, the relative 
                simplicity of the 'Agnus Dei' movement is winning, as is the affecting 
                baritone solo in the fifth movement, and Goodall knits the threads 
                of the work together convincingly in the tenth and final movement.
              Perhaps the most telling point to make to collectors is that 
                the piece quite obviously made an impression on the audiences 
                at the performances in which I took part; many people were genuinely 
                moved. Also, several members of the choir have commented to me 
                that they've come to have an increasing regard for it as they've 
                got to know it better. A good deal of comment has come my way 
                that indicates a genuine desire to hear or sing the work again. 
              
              Obviously the key to the work's success or otherwise will be 
                the extent to which choirs take it up. The general reaction to 
                the piece after the performances in which I took part suggests 
                that I can safely stand by my prediction that Eternal Light will 
                become very popular.
              John Quinn
                December 2009