Editorial Board
MusicWeb International
Founding Editor Rob Barnett Editor in Chief
John Quinn Contributing Editor Ralph Moore Webmaster
David Barker Postmaster
Jonathan Woolf MusicWeb Founder Len Mullenger
Johannes BRAHMS (1833-1897) Symphony No. 1 in C minor, Op. 68
(1876) [45:19]
Double Concerto in A
minor Op.102 (1887) [34:13]
Willi
Boskovsky (violin) and Emanuel Brabec (cello)
Concertgebouw Orchestra (sym.), Vienna
Philharmonic Orchestra (conc.)/Wilhelm Furtwängler
rec. live, Amsterdam, 13 July 1950 (sym.) and
live, Vienna, 27 January 1952 (conc.)
IDIS 6554
[79:38]
As most adherents of the conductor will aver
if you want to hear Furtwängler at his greatest in this symphony
you go to the 1951 NDR performance. And if you do then you will
hear one of the most wrenching, powerful and convincing
performances imaginable. That said you have no shortage of
comparison points because many survivals exist, ranging from
the 1947 Lucerne to the 1954 Venezuela, made in the year of his
death.
Incomplete wartime performances also exist. In between these
twin poles come performances in Vienna in 1947 and '52, Berlin
in '52
and the following year, Turin in '52 and this Amsterdam
performance of 1950.
Whilst less idiomatic and less gripping
than the NDR this Concertgebouw traversal is similarly effective
in establishing its big boned, long breathed and granitic
credentials. Seldom has a conductor established the mood of the
opening movement better than Furtwängler. It's slow - it makes
Knappertsbusch sound like Weingartner - expansive, heroic, noble,
weighty and magnificently conceived. The trumpets cut through
the
brine with biting authority, and the strings play with - in my
experience - an unusual amount of portamento for this orchestra.
Given the choice of other performances there is no reason to
prefer this to the NDR but it is a powerfully charged document
nevertheless.
Its disc companion is the Vienna reading of
the Double Concerto with section principals Willi Boskovsky and
Emanuel Brabec. I recall that a possible commercial recording
with
Menuhin and Casals had been mooted but never took place. Another
broadcast survivor is the Lucerne performance where Furtwangler
teamed up with Schneiderhan and Mainardi. The Vienna soloists
make
for a better ensemble pairing than the slightly tonally mismatched
Lucerne duo, eminent though they are, though a corollary is that
they are less distinctive, Boskovsky plays with his usual silvery
sweetness of tone and some of his and Brabec's phrasal punctuation
sounds at odds with the more adamantine priorities of the
conductor whose view of the work is rather dark and - if you're
unsympathetic - ponderous. The finale is sluggish to my ears
but
there's a rather Dvorákian feel to the winds, which I find
attractive.
Less attractive is the transfer. It's been
out on EMI CDH 7634962 as well as on a variety of smaller labels
- Toshiba, Curcio-Hunt, Archipel and others. My Italian EMI LP
[3C
153 53661/69H], which was a big Furtwängler-Brahms collection,
sounds warmer, and more natural. Electronics has imparted a rather
synthetic, aggressive almost shrill patina to the sound, at the
same time constricting dynamics.
A
worthwhile pairing then but the transfers in both are bettered
elsewhere.
Reviews
from previous months Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the
discs reviewed. details We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin
Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to
which you refer.