Editorial Board
MusicWeb International
Founding Editor Rob Barnett Editor in Chief
John Quinn Contributing Editor Ralph Moore Webmaster
David Barker Postmaster
Jonathan Woolf MusicWeb Founder Len Mullenger
Ludwig van BEETHOVEN
(1770-1827)
Violin Concerto in D major, Op. 61 (1806) [41:52]
Symphony No. 2 in D major, Op. 36 (1802) [34:25]
Arthur Grumiaux (violin)
Concertgebouw Orchestra, Amsterdam/Eduard van Beinum
rec. Concertgebouw, Amsterdam, June 1957 (Concerto) and May 1954
(Symphony). ADD ELOQUENCE 480
0428 [76:20]
I have rarely heard a more exhilarating reading of the first movement
of Beethoven's Second Symphony than this one, and the following
slow movement begins in Olympian calm. The scherzo and finale,
on the other hand, are characterised by a kind of purposeful heaviness.
The work is generally seen as one of Beethoven's good-natured
essays, but in van Beinum's hands there is more to it, the
relaxed side of things rather underplayed, the conductor apparently
looking for - and finding - demonic energy. This might sound daunting,
and indeed I wouldn't want to hear the symphony this way every
time, but as one view of the work it is totally convincing. Only
the scherzo seems a little slow compared to today's manner,
but the weight van Beinum finds in it is surely there by right.
The phrasing in the slow movement is delicious, and smiles there
are aplenty, particularly in those passages which remind us that
Beethoven was already an adopted Viennese by this time. There
are thrilling moments in both outer movements, but it's true
that some of the humour in the finale - Beethoven and Haydn so
close in spirit - is neglected in favour of weight and drama.
Almost throughout one would ideally hope for a little more lightness
of touch, that forte and fortissimo passages might
be toned down a notch or two. The balance favours the strings,
of course, as was the way in 1954, but the orchestra plays superbly
well. Each of Beethoven's symphonies has its particular attraction
- except the Pastoral in my case, a personal blind spot
- and I can quite imagine that the next time I feel like listening
to the Second I will take van Beinum down from the shelves.
Even if you react unfavourably to van Beinum's view of the
symphony, it makes a generous and challenging coupling to Grumiaux's
superb reading of the Violin Concerto. This version from 1957
is the earliest of Grumiaux's three recordings of the Beethoven.
He later went on to record it with the New Philharmonia and Alceo
Galliera and later still with the Concertgebouw Orchestra, as
here, conducted by Sir Colin Davis. I had never heard the present
performance before receiving it for review, nor have I heard the
performance with Davis, so I'm badly placed to judge whether
the accepted view that the reading with Galliera is the finest
of the three is the right one or not. There seems little doubt,
though, that the soloist is more rapt and poised in that second
reading - also available on Eloquence, incidentally - than in
his first. More to the point, though, is the orchestral contribution,
where van Beinum offers more in the way of character than Galliera
later did. Interestingly, in this sweetest of concertos, van Beinum's
view of Beethoven remains the same as in the symphony recorded
three years earlier, which is to say that whilst he accompanies
his soloist with the utmost tact and precision, when it is the
orchestra's turn to shine things become more forceful and
muscular. He never overplays his hand, though, and a glance at
the score shows just how frequently Beethoven marked the music
to be played fortissimo. The long orchestral passage about
half way through the first movement, almost like a second exposition,
is a case in point: van Beinum does not shrink before the sustained
fortissimo markings here, and I'm not sure that I've
heard it quite like this before. The contrast between the occasionally
somewhat gruff voice of the orchestra and wonderfully sweet, calmness
of the soloist cannot be ignored, but it never leads to tension;
on the contrary, it makes for a fascinating reading of the concerto
quite different in atmosphere from others I have heard. In any
event, the distance between soloist and conductor is less in evidence
in the divine slow movement and in the finale.
Both recordings are mono, that of the symphony just slightly congested
from time to time. In the concerto the soloist is rather forward,
bringing passages which are merely figuration a bit too close
to the listener, sometimes to the cost of orchestral detail. There
is also a curious, faint fluttering sound from time to time, audible
only when the orchestra is not playing, such as in the first movement
cadenza, but overall the sound is fine for the period, slightly
less harsh than that of the symphony, and in any event perfectly
capable of making for a pleasurably listening experience. The
appeal of this absurdly cheap disc is further enhanced by a typically
friendly and informative booklet essay by Raymond Tuttle.
Reviews
from previous months Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the
discs reviewed. details We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin
Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to
which you refer.